Skip to main content

Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks

Abstract

It has often been asserted that working-memory limitations are a major factor contributing to problem difficulty; for example, Johnson-Laird’s (1983) mental-models theory appeals to working memory limitations to explain the difficulty of syllogistic reasoning. However, few studies have directly explored working memory in problem solving in general or syllogistic reasoning in particular. This paper reports two studies. In the first, working-memory load was varied by presenting syllogistic tasks either verbally or visually (so that the premises were continuous1y avai1ab1e for inspection). A significant effect of memory load was obtained. In the second study, premises were presented visually for a subject-determined time. Dual-task methods were used to assess the role of working-memory components, as identified in Baddeley’s (1986) model. Syllogistic performance was disrupted by concurrent random-number generation but not by concurrent articulatory suppression or by concurrent tapping in a preset pattern. Furthermore, the concurrent syllogism task interfered with random generation and to a lesser extent with articulatory suppression, but not with tapping. We conclude that while the central-executive component of working memory played a major role in the syllogistic-task performance reported here, the articulatory loop had a lesser role, and the visuospatial scratch pad was not involved.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.),Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V. J., &Vallar, G. (1984), Exploring the articulatory loop.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36, 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Begg, I., &Denny, J. P. (1969). Empirical reconciliation of atmosphere and conversion interpretations of syllogistic reasoning errors.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 351–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Braine, M. D. S. (1978). On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic.Psychological Review,85, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Braine, M. D. S., &Rumain, B. (1983). Logical reasoning. In J. Flavell & E. Markman (Eds.),Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 263–340). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dickstein, L. S. (1978). The effect of figure on syllogistic reasoning.Memory & Cognition,6, 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Erickson, J. R. (1974). A set analysis theory of behavior in a formal syllogistic reasoning task. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 305–330). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erickson, J. R. (1978). Research on syllogistic reasoning. In R. Revlin & R. E. Mayer (Eds.),Human reasoning (pp. 39–50). Washington, DC: Winston,

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evans, F. J. (1978). Monitoring attention deployment by random num ber generation: An index to measure subjective randomness.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,12, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Evans, J. St. B. T., &Brooks, P. G. (1981). Competing with reasoning: A test of the working memory hypothesis.Current Psychological Research,1, 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farah, M. J., Hammond, K. M., Levine, D. N., &Calvanio, R. (1988). Visual and spatial mental imagery: Dissociable systems of representation.Cognitive Psychology,20, 439–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Farmer, E. W., Berman, J. V. F., &Fletcher, Y. L. (1986). Evidence for a visuo-spatial scratch-pad in working memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,38A, 675–688.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher, D. L. (1981). A three-factor model of syllogistic reasoning: The study of isolable stages.Memory & Cognition,9, 496–514.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Galotti, K. M., Baron, J., &Sabini, J. P. (1986). Individual differences in syllogistic reasoning: Deduction rules or mental models?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilhooly, K. J. (1988).Thinking: Directed, undirected and creative (2nd ed). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gilhooly, K. J. (1991). Thinking. In R. Dulbecco (Ed.),Encyclopedia of human biology (pp. 467–472). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Guyote, M. J., &Sternberg, R. J. (1981). A transitive chain theory of syllogistic reasoning.Cognitive Psychology,13, 461–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Halford, G. S., Bain, J. D., &Maybery, M. T. (1984). Does a concurrent memory load interfere with reasoning?Current Psychological Research & Reviews,3, 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hitch, G. J., &Baddeley, A. D. (1976). Verbal reasoning and working memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,28,603–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Bara, B. G. (1984). Syllogistic inference.Cognition,17, 1–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. (1991).Deduction. Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kirby, K. N., &Kosslyn, S. M. (1990). Thinking visually.Mind & Language,5, 324–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Logie, R. H. (1989). Characteristics of visual short-term memory.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,1, 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Logie, R. H. (1991). Visuo-spatial short term memory: Visual working memory or visual buffer. In C. Cornoldi & M. McDaniel (Eds.),Imagery and cognition (pp. 77–102). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Logie, R. H., Baddeley, A. D., Mane, A., Donchin, E., &Shep-tak, R. (1989). Working memory in the acquisition of complex cognitive skills.Acta Psychologica,71, 53–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Logie, R. H., Zucco, G., &Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Interference with visual short-term memory.Acta Psychologica,75, 55–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Newell, A., &Simon, H. A. (1972).Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Norman, D. A., &Shallice, T. (1980).Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior (CHIP Report No. 99). San Diego: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reisberg, D., & Logie, R. H. (in press). The ins and outs of visual working memory: Overcoming the limits on learning from imagery. In M. Intons-Peterson, B. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & R. Anderson (Eds.),Imagery, creativity, and discovery: A cognitive approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  32. Revlis, R. (1975). Two models of syllogistic reasoning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 180–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rips, L. J. (1983). Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning.Psychological Review,90, 38–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Saariluoma, P. (1991). Visuo-spatial interference and apperception in chess. In R. H. Logic & M. Denis (Eds.),Mental images in human cognition (pp. 83–94). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Salway, A. F. S. (1991).Random generation in the working memory dual task paradigm. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sanford, A. J. (1985).Cognition and cognitive psychology. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schneider, W. (1990). MELuser’s guide: Computer techniquesfor real timepsychological experimentation. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sells, S. B. (1936). The atmosphere effect: An experimental study of reasoning.Archives of Psychology,200, 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (in press). Spatial inclusion as an analogy for set membership: A case study of analogy at work. In K. Holyoak& J. Barnden (Eds.),Analogical connections. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  40. Sternberg, R. J., &Turner, M. E. (1981). Components of syllogistic reasoning.Acta Psychologica,47, 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wason, P. C., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972).Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wetherick, N. E. (1989). Psychology and syllogistic reasoning.Philosophical Psychology,2, 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wetherick, N. E., &Gilhooly, K. J. (1990). Syllogistic reasoning: Effects ofpremise order. In K. J. Gilhooly, M. T. 0. Keane, R. H. Logic, & G. Erdos (Eds.),Lines of thinking (Vol. 1, pp. 99–108). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wilkins, M. C. (1928). The effect of changed material on the ability to do formal syllogistic reasoning.Archives of Psychology,16, 83.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Woodworth, R. J., &Sells, S. B. (1935). An atmosphere effect in formal syllogistic reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. J. Gilhooly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilhooly, K.J., Logie, R.H., Wetherick, N.E. et al. Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks. Memory & Cognition 21, 115–124 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211170

Download citation

Keywords

  • Secondary Task
  • Random Generation
  • Central Executive
  • Articulatory Suppression
  • Reasoning Task