Memory & Cognition

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 115–124 | Cite as

Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks

  • K. J. Gilhooly
  • R. H. Logie
  • N. E. Wetherick
  • V. Wynn
Article

Abstract

It has often been asserted that working-memory limitations are a major factor contributing to problem difficulty; for example, Johnson-Laird’s (1983) mental-models theory appeals to working memory limitations to explain the difficulty of syllogistic reasoning. However, few studies have directly explored working memory in problem solving in general or syllogistic reasoning in particular. This paper reports two studies. In the first, working-memory load was varied by presenting syllogistic tasks either verbally or visually (so that the premises were continuous1y avai1ab1e for inspection). A significant effect of memory load was obtained. In the second study, premises were presented visually for a subject-determined time. Dual-task methods were used to assess the role of working-memory components, as identified in Baddeley’s (1986) model. Syllogistic performance was disrupted by concurrent random-number generation but not by concurrent articulatory suppression or by concurrent tapping in a preset pattern. Furthermore, the concurrent syllogism task interfered with random generation and to a lesser extent with articulatory suppression, but not with tapping. We conclude that while the central-executive component of working memory played a major role in the syllogistic-task performance reported here, the articulatory loop had a lesser role, and the visuospatial scratch pad was not involved.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.),Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V. J., &Vallar, G. (1984), Exploring the articulatory loop.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36, 233–252.Google Scholar
  4. Begg, I., &Denny, J. P. (1969). Empirical reconciliation of atmosphere and conversion interpretations of syllogistic reasoning errors.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 351–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braine, M. D. S. (1978). On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic.Psychological Review,85, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braine, M. D. S., &Rumain, B. (1983). Logical reasoning. In J. Flavell & E. Markman (Eds.),Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 263–340). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Dickstein, L. S. (1978). The effect of figure on syllogistic reasoning.Memory & Cognition,6, 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erickson, J. R. (1974). A set analysis theory of behavior in a formal syllogistic reasoning task. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 305–330). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Erickson, J. R. (1978). Research on syllogistic reasoning. In R. Revlin & R. E. Mayer (Eds.),Human reasoning (pp. 39–50). Washington, DC: Winston,Google Scholar
  10. Evans, F. J. (1978). Monitoring attention deployment by random num ber generation: An index to measure subjective randomness.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,12, 35–38.Google Scholar
  11. Evans, J. St. B. T., &Brooks, P. G. (1981). Competing with reasoning: A test of the working memory hypothesis.Current Psychological Research,1, 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farah, M. J., Hammond, K. M., Levine, D. N., &Calvanio, R. (1988). Visual and spatial mental imagery: Dissociable systems of representation.Cognitive Psychology,20, 439–462.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Farmer, E. W., Berman, J. V. F., &Fletcher, Y. L. (1986). Evidence for a visuo-spatial scratch-pad in working memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,38A, 675–688.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, D. L. (1981). A three-factor model of syllogistic reasoning: The study of isolable stages.Memory & Cognition,9, 496–514.Google Scholar
  15. Galotti, K. M., Baron, J., &Sabini, J. P. (1986). Individual differences in syllogistic reasoning: Deduction rules or mental models?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilhooly, K. J. (1988).Thinking: Directed, undirected and creative (2nd ed). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gilhooly, K. J. (1991). Thinking. In R. Dulbecco (Ed.),Encyclopedia of human biology (pp. 467–472). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Guyote, M. J., &Sternberg, R. J. (1981). A transitive chain theory of syllogistic reasoning.Cognitive Psychology,13, 461–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halford, G. S., Bain, J. D., &Maybery, M. T. (1984). Does a concurrent memory load interfere with reasoning?Current Psychological Research & Reviews,3, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hitch, G. J., &Baddeley, A. D. (1976). Verbal reasoning and working memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,28,603–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Bara, B. G. (1984). Syllogistic inference.Cognition,17, 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. (1991).Deduction. Hove: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Kirby, K. N., &Kosslyn, S. M. (1990). Thinking visually.Mind & Language,5, 324–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Logie, R. H. (1989). Characteristics of visual short-term memory.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,1, 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Logie, R. H. (1991). Visuo-spatial short term memory: Visual working memory or visual buffer. In C. Cornoldi & M. McDaniel (Eds.),Imagery and cognition (pp. 77–102). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Logie, R. H., Baddeley, A. D., Mane, A., Donchin, E., &Shep-tak, R. (1989). Working memory in the acquisition of complex cognitive skills.Acta Psychologica,71, 53–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Logie, R. H., Zucco, G., &Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Interference with visual short-term memory.Acta Psychologica,75, 55–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Newell, A., &Simon, H. A. (1972).Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Norman, D. A., &Shallice, T. (1980).Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior (CHIP Report No. 99). San Diego: University of California.Google Scholar
  31. Reisberg, D., & Logie, R. H. (in press). The ins and outs of visual working memory: Overcoming the limits on learning from imagery. In M. Intons-Peterson, B. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & R. Anderson (Eds.),Imagery, creativity, and discovery: A cognitive approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  32. Revlis, R. (1975). Two models of syllogistic reasoning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 180–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rips, L. J. (1983). Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning.Psychological Review,90, 38–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saariluoma, P. (1991). Visuo-spatial interference and apperception in chess. In R. H. Logic & M. Denis (Eds.),Mental images in human cognition (pp. 83–94). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Salway, A. F. S. (1991).Random generation in the working memory dual task paradigm. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.Google Scholar
  36. Sanford, A. J. (1985).Cognition and cognitive psychology. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
  37. Schneider, W. (1990). MELuser’s guide: Computer techniquesfor real timepsychological experimentation. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
  38. Sells, S. B. (1936). The atmosphere effect: An experimental study of reasoning.Archives of Psychology,200, 1–72.Google Scholar
  39. Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (in press). Spatial inclusion as an analogy for set membership: A case study of analogy at work. In K. Holyoak& J. Barnden (Eds.),Analogical connections. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Sternberg, R. J., &Turner, M. E. (1981). Components of syllogistic reasoning.Acta Psychologica,47, 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wason, P. C., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972).Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
  42. Wetherick, N. E. (1989). Psychology and syllogistic reasoning.Philosophical Psychology,2, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wetherick, N. E., &Gilhooly, K. J. (1990). Syllogistic reasoning: Effects ofpremise order. In K. J. Gilhooly, M. T. 0. Keane, R. H. Logic, & G. Erdos (Eds.),Lines of thinking (Vol. 1, pp. 99–108). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Wilkins, M. C. (1928). The effect of changed material on the ability to do formal syllogistic reasoning.Archives of Psychology,16, 83.Google Scholar
  45. Woodworth, R. J., &Sells, S. B. (1935). An atmosphere effect in formal syllogistic reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. J. Gilhooly
    • 1
  • R. H. Logie
    • 1
  • N. E. Wetherick
    • 1
  • V. Wynn
    • 1
  1. 1.DepartmentAberdeen UniversityAberdeenScotland

Personalised recommendations