Abstract
Spatial priming in recognizing objects in experimentally learned environments has been proposed as strong evidence for spatial organization of environmental memory. However, in all studies showing recognition priming effects, encoding and rehearsal contiguity may have coincided with spatial proximity, and thus priming may have been due to temporal associations formed during rehearsal, not encoded spatial relations per se. We investigated this question in four experiments, using a trip trial learning method in which temporal contiguity and spatial relations were independent. In Experiment 1, no spatial priming in recognition was found, even though indirect evidence suggested that subjects had encoded spatial relations. In Experiment 2, the trip trial method was compared with the free study procedure commonly used in previous priming studies. Spatial priming occurred only for free study subjects, even though the two groups were equivalent on direct measures of encoding accuracy. In Experiment 3, spatial priming in recognition was obtained with a modification of the trip trial method in which temporal and spatial contiguity were deliberately confounded. In Experiment 4, the unmodified trip trial method produced spatial priming in a location-decision task. Taken together, our results suggest that environmental memory may be spatially organized, but retrieval of object identities does not necessarily activate encoded spatial relations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Clayton, K. N., &Chattin, D. (1989). Spatial and semantic priming effects in tests of spatial knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,15, 495–506.
Clayton, K. N., &Habibi, A. (1991). Contribution of temporal contiguity to the spatial priming effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 263–271.
Evans, G. W. (1980). Environmental cognition.Psychological Bulletin,88, 259–287.
Evans, G. W., &Pezdek, K. (1980). Cognitive mapping: Knowledge ofreal-world distance and location information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 13–24.
Hirtle, S. C., &Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps.Memory & Cognition,13, 208–217.
Mcnamara, T. P. (1986). Mental representations of spatial relations.Cognitive Psychology,18, 87–121.
Mcnamara, T. P., Altarriba, J., Bendele, M., Johnson, S. C., &Clayton, K. N. (1989). Constraints on priming in spatialmemory: Naturally learned versus experimentally learned environments.Memory & Cognition,17, 444–453.
Mcnamara, T. P., Hardy, J. K., &Hirtle, S. C. (1989). Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. & Cognition,15, 211–227.
Mcnamara, T. P., Ratcuff, R., &Mckoon, G. (1984). The mental representation of knowledge acquired from maps.Journal of Erperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 723–732.
Merrill, A. A., &Baird, J. C. (1987), Semantic and spatial factors in environmental memory.Memory & Cognition,15, 101–108.
Sherman, R. C. (1987, May).Hierarchical structure in cognitive maps. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
Sherman, R. C., Croxton, J., &Smith, J. (1979). Movement and structure as determinants of spatial representations.Journal of Environmental Psychology & Non-Verbal Behavior,4, 27–39.
Sherman, R. C., Oliver, C., &Titus, W. (1980). Veritying environmental relationships.Memory & Cognition,8, 555–562.
Siegel, A. W., &White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large scale environments. In H. W. Reese (Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10; pp. 9–55). New York: Academic Press.
Stevens, A. L., &Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations.Cognitive Psychology,10, 422–437.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sherman, R.C., Lim, K.M. Determinants of spatial priming in environmental memory. Memory & Cognition 19, 283–292 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211152
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211152