Abstract
Several strategies are proposed as bases for judgments of covariation between events. Covariation problems were structured in such a way that patterns of correct and incorrect judgments would index the judgment rule being used by a given subject. In two experiments, 10th-grade or college subjects viewed a set of covariation problems, each of which consisted of a set of observations in which each of two events was defined as present or absent. Subjects were asked to identify the relationship between the events. Subjects’ response patterns suggested that the modal strategy was to compare frequency of confirming and disconfirming events in defining the relationship. Response accuracy was influenced by pretraining on the concept of covariation and by response format. Instructions to sort the observations did not influence judgment accuracy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alloy, L., &Abramson, L. Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1979,108, 441–485.
Guttman, L. A basis for scaling qualitative data. In M. Fishbein (Ed.),Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley, 1967.
Heider, F.The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
Inhelder, B., &Piaget, J.The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books, 1958.
Jenkins, H., &Ward, W. Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes.Psychological Monographs, 1965,79, 1–17.
Kelley, H. Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967.
Mccall, R., &Appelbaum, M. Bias in the analysis of repeated-measures designs: Some alternative approaches.Child Development, 1973,44, 401–415.
Morrison, D.Multivariate statistical methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
Neimark, E. Longitudinal development of formal operations thought.Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1975,91, 171–225.
Seggie, J., &Endersby, H. The empirical implications of Piaget’s concept of correlation.Australian Journal of Psychology, 1972,24, 3–8.
Smedslund, J. The concept of correlation in adults.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1963,4, 165–173.
Ward, W., &Jenkins, H. The display of information and the judgment of contingency.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1965,19, 231–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaklee, H., Tucker, D. A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events. Memory & Cognition 8, 459–467 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211142
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211142