Abstract
Four experiments studied characteristics of auditory images initiated by named but unheard sounds. The sounds varied in their loudness ratings. As the difference between the loudness ratings of the two sound phrases increased, the times to mentally equate the loudness of the two images increased, whereas the times to identify the louder (or softer) of the images decreased. Moreover, congruity effects were found in the comparative judgment task: Times were faster to identify the louder of two loud-rated stimuli than to judge the softer of the same two stimuli, and times were faster to identify the softer of the two soft-rated than two loud-rated stimuli. The loudness ratings did not always influence performance, however, for neither an image generation nor a reading task showed response times that varied with loudness ratings. These results suggest that sensory/perceptual components are optionally represented in auditory images. These components are included when appropriate to a given task. A control experiment showed that the results cannot be considered epiphenomenal.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Audley, R. J., &Wallis, C. P. Response instructions and the speed of relative judgments: I. Some experiments on brightness discrimination.British Journal of Psychology, 1964,55, 59–73.
Banks, W. P. Encoding and processing of semantic information in comparative judgments. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press, 1977.
Clark, H. H. Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 187–404.
Clark, H. H., &Brownell, H. H. Position, direction, and their perceptual integrality.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 328–334.
Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1979,108, 356–388.
Holyoak, K. J. Comparative judgments with numerical reference points.Cognitive Psychology, 1978,10, 203–243.
Jamieson, D. G., &Petrusic, W. M. Relational judgments with remembered stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 373–378.
Lovelace, E. A., &Snodgrass, R. D. Decision times for alphabetic order of letter pairs.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,88, 258–264.
Masks, D. F. Relative judgments: A phenomenon and a theory.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 156–160.
Marschask, M., &Paivio, A. Semantic congruity and lexical marking in symbolic comparisons: An expectancy hypothesis.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 175–184.
Mitchell, D. B., &Ricnman, C. L. Confirmed reservations: Mental travel.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 48–66.
Moyes, R. S., &Dumais, S. T. Mental comparison. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Neisser, U. Changing conceptions of imagery. In P. W. Sheehan (Ed.),The function and nature of imagery. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Orne, M. T. Demand characteristics and the concept of quasicontrols. In R. Rosenthal & R. L. Rosnow (Eds.),Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
Paivio, A. Mental comparisons involving abstract attributes.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 199–208.
Parkman, J. M. Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,91, 191–205.
Rosch, E. Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & R. B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Shepard, R. N., &Podgorny, P. Cognitive processes that resemble perceptual processes. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Trabasso, T., &Riley, C. A. The construction and use of representations involving linear order. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Tulving, E., &Watkins, M. J. Structure of memory traces.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 261–275.
Underwood, B. J.Temporal codes for memories: Issues and problems. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Wallis, C. P., &Audley, R. J. Response instructions and the speed of relative judgments: II. Pitch discrimination.British Journal of Psychology, 1964,55, 121–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Intons-Pererson, M.J. The role of loudness in auditory imagery. Memory & Cognition 8, 385–393 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211134
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211134