Abstract
In multiattribute decision problems, the subject has to evaluate a number of alternatives with given values on a number of attributes, in order to arrive at some conclusion about the attractiveness or utility of these alternatives. The information processing procedure leading to a conclusion is called adecision strategy, and one of the main research topics in multiattribute decision research has been the extent to which these strategies follow compensatory principles. Judges are said to follow compensatory strategies when low values on some attributes are compensated for by high values on other attributes. In process tracing studies using the information board technique, descriptions of decision strategies are usually based on three indices of the information search process:variability of search,search pattern (Payne, 1976), anddepth of search. Variability of search, defined as the standard deviation of the proportion of information searched per alternative, is considered to give an indication of the degree of compensation of a decision strategy, compensation being smaller as variability increases. In this article, we propose an alternative way for establishing the degree of compensation of decision strategies in information board studies. We argue that the degree of compensation depends on both variability of searchand depth of search (the proportion of information searched), and that a valid compensation index has to be a multiplicative function of these two indices.
Article PDF
References
Beach, L. R., &Potter, R. E. (1992). The pre-choice screening of options.Acta Psychologica,81, 115–126.
Cronbach, L. J. (1990).Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Ford, J. K., Schmitt, N., Schechtman, S. L., Hults, B. M., &Doherty, M. L. (1989). Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research issues.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,43, 75–117.
Johnson, N. L., &Kotz, S. (1969).Discrete distributions. New York: Wiley.
Klayman, J. (1983). Analysis of pre decisional information search patterns. In P. C. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Eds.),Analysing and aiding decision processes (pp. 401–414). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis.Organizational Behavior & Human Performance,16, 366–387.
Stevenson, M. K., Busemeyer, J. R., &Naylor, J. C. (1990). Judgment and decision-making theory. In M. D. Dunette & L. M. Hough (Eds.),Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 283–374). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Svenson, O. (1979). Process descriptions of decision making.Organizational Behavior & Human Performance,23, 86–112.
Westenberg, M. R. M., &Koele, P. (1994). Multiattribute evaluation processes: Methodological and conceptual issues.Acta Psychologica,87, 65–84.
Willems, P.,Koele, P., &Westenberg, M. R. M. (1995).A comparison of different information board techniques. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Psychology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koele, P., Westenberg, M.R.M. A compensation index for multiattribute decision strategies. Psychon Bull Rev 2, 398–402 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210979
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210979