Abstract
An assumption of the generate/recognize model of direct and indirect memory is that the generation stage is identical on explicit and implicit tests. Two experiments were conducted to examine the generation stage by requiring subjects to write down every word-stem solution they could generate on either an implicit test, a cued-recall test, or a generate/recognize test. In Experiment 1, the subjects studied words and anagrams; target generation was not significantly different on the three tests. However, in Experiment 2, the subjects studied the target words with a context word, and saw either thesame ordifferent context with the test stem. Now the generation stages dissociated, such that the context manipulation had no significant effect on the implicit test, but on the cued-recall test, more targets were generated with the same context words than were generated with different context words. The results argue against the claim that dissociations between implicit and explicit tests are due only to the addition of recognition processes on the explicit test, because the generation processes themselves can be dissociated.
Article PDF
References
Bilodeau, E. A., &Howell, D. C. (1965).Free association norms by discrete and continued methods (Tech. Rep. No. 1). New Orleans: Tulane University, Department of Psychology.
Gibson, J. M., &Watkins, M. J. (1988). A pool of 1,086 words with unique two-letter fragments.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 390–397.
Graf, P., &Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 501–518.
Jacoby, L. L. (1984). Incidental versus intentional retrieval: Remembering and awareness as separate issues. In L. S. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.),Neuropsychology of memory (pp. 145–156). New York: Guilford.
Jacoby, L. L., &Hollingshead, A. (1990). Toward a generate/recognize model of performance on direct and indirect tests of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 433–454.
Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., &Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 139–154.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Light, L. L., &Carter-Sobell, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 1–11.
Richardson-Klavehn, A., &Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory.Annual Review of Psychology,39, 475–543.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In H. Spinnler & F. Boller (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 501–518.
Thomson, D. M. (1972). Context effects in recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 497–511.
Thomson, D. M., &Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 255–262.
Tulving, E., &Osler, S. (1968). Effectiveness of retrieval cues in memory for words.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 593–601.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Weldon, M. S., Roediger, H. L., III,Beitel, D., &Johnston, T. R. (1995). Perceptual and conceptual processes in implicit and explicit tests with picture fragment and word fragment cues.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 268–285.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1235–1253.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a faculty research grant and a Social Sciences Divisional Research Award from the University of California, Santa Cruz. We thank Tajma Abrams for her assistance in testing subjects, and James Neely, Bradford Challis, John Gardiner, Larry Jacoby, and Henry L. Roediger III, for their many helpful comments on the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weldon, M.S., Colston, H.L. Dissociating the generation stage in implicit and explicit memory tests: Incidental production can differ from strategic access. Psychon Bull Rev 2, 381–386 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210976
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210976