Abstract
Memory for the final position of a moving target is often shifted or displaced from the true final position of that target. Early studies of this memory shift focused on parallels between the momentum of the target and the momentum of the representation of the target and called this displacementrepresentational momentum, but many factors other than momentum contribute to the memory shift. A consideration of the empirical literature on representational momentum and related types of displacement suggests there are at least four different types of factors influencing the direction and magnitude of such memory shifts: stimulus characteristics (e.g., target direction, target velocity), implied dynamics and environmental invariants (e.g., implied momentum, gravity, friction, centripetal force), memory averaging of target and nontarget context (e.g., biases toward previous target locations or nontarget context), and observers’ expectations (both tacit and conscious) regarding future target motion and target/context interactions. Several theories purporting to account for representational momentum and related types of displacement are also considered.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Algom, D. (1992). Memory psychophysics: An examination of its perceptual and cognitive prospects. In D. Algom (Ed.),Psychophysical approaches to cognition (pp. 441–513). New York: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Bertamini, M. (1993). Memory for position and dynamic representations.Memory & Cognition,21, 449–457.
Bharucha, J. J., &Hubbard, T. L. (1989).Anticipated collision along an oblique path: Effects on judged displacement. Unpublished manuscript.
Cooke, N. J., &Breedin, S. D. (1994a). Constructing naive theories of motion on the fly.Memory & Cognition,22, 474–493.
Cooke, N. J., &Breedin, S. D. (1994b). Naive misconceptions of Cooke and Breedin’s research: Response to Ranney.Memory & Cognition,22, 503–507.
Faust, M. (1990).Representational momentum: A dual process perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
Finke, R. A., &Freyd, J. J. (1985). Transformations of visual memory induced by implied motions of pattern elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 780–794.
Finke, R. A., &Freyd, J. J. (1989). Mental extrapolation and cognitive penetrability: Reply to Ranney and proposals for evaluative criteria.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 403–408.
Finke, R. A., Freyd, J. J., &Shyi, G. C. W. (1986). Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 175–188.
Finke, R. A., &Shyi, G. C. W. (1988). Mental extrapolation and representational momentum for complex implied motions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 112–120.
Fodor, J. A. (1983).The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Freyd, J. J. (1983). The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 575–581.
Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations.Psychological Review,94, 427–438.
Freyd, J. J. (1992). Dynamic representations guiding adaptive behavior. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. J. Friedman (Eds.),Time, action, and cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 309–323). Dordrecht: Kluver.
Freyd, J. J. (1993). Five hunches about perceptual processes and dynamic representations. In D. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 99–119). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Freyd, J. J., &Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 126–132.
Freyd, J. J., &Finke, R. A. (1985). A velocity effect for representational momentum.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 443–446.
Freyd, J. J., &Johnson, J. Q. (1987). Probing the time course of representational momentum.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 259–269.
Freyd, J. J., &Jones, K. T. (1994). Representational momentum for a spiral path.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 968–976.
Freyd, J. J., Kelly, M. H., &DeKay, M. L. (1990). Representational momentum in memory for pitch.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 1107–1117.
Freyd, J. J., Pantzer, T. M., &Cheng, J. L. (1988). Representing statics as forces in equilibrium.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 395–407.
Futterweit, L. R., &Beilin, H. (1994). Recognition memory for movement in photographs: A developmental study.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,57, 163–179.
Grossberg, S., &Rudd, M. E. (1989). A neural architecture for visual motion perception: Group and element apparent motion.Neural Networks,2, 421–450.
Halpern, A. R., &Kelly, M. H. (1993). Memory biases in left versus right implied motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 471–484.
Hubbard, T. L. (1990). Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement.Memory & Cognition,18, 299–309.
Hubbard, T. L. (1993a). Auditory representational momentum: Musical schemata and modularity.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,31, 201–204.
Hubbard, T. L. (1993b). The effect of context on visual representational momentum.Memory & Cognition,21, 103–114.
Hubbard, T. L. (1994a). Judged displacement: A modular process?American Journal of Psychology,107, 359–373.
Hubbard, T. L. (1994b). Memory psychophysics.Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung,56, 237–250.
Hubbard, T. L. (1995a). Auditory representational momentum: Surface form, velocity, and direction effects.American Journal of Psychology,108, 255–274.
Hubbard, T. L. (1995b). Cognitive representation of motion: Evidence for representational friction and gravity analogues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1–14.
Hubbard, T. L. (1995c).Representational momentum, centripetal force, and curvilinear impetus. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Hubbard, T. L. (1995d).Target size and displacement along the axis of implied gravitational attraction. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Hubbard, T. L. (in press). Displacement in depth: Representational momentum and boundary extension.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung.
Hubbard, T. L., &Bharucha, J. J. (1988). Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 211–221.
Intraub, H., Bender, R. S., &Mangels, J. A. (1992). Looking at pictures but remembering scenes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 180–191.
Intraub, H., &Bodamer, J. L. (1993). Boundary extension: Fundamental aspect of pictorial representation or encoding artifact?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1387–1397.
Intraub, H., &Richardson, M. (1989). Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 179–187.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., &Tversky, A. (1982).Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, M. H., &Freyd, J. J. (1987). Explorations of representational momentum.Cognitive Psychology,19, 369–401.
McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.),Mental models (pp. 299–324). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McCloskey, M., &Kohl, D. (1983). Naive physics: The curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 146–156.
Munger, M. P., &Cooper, L. A. (1993, November).What is represented in representational momentum? Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
Pantzer, T. M., &Freyd, J. J. (1989).Searching for a mass effect for representational momentum. Unpublished manuscript.
Ranney, M. (1989). Internally represented forces may be cognitively penetrable: Comment on Freyd, Pantzer, and Cheng (1988).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 399–402.
Ranney, M. (1994). Relative consistency and subjects’ “theories” in domains such as naive physics: Common research difficulties illustrated by Cooke and Breedin.Memory & Cognition,22, 494–502.
Reed, C. L., &Vinson, N. G. (in press). Conceptual effects on representational momentum.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imaging, thinking, and dreaming.Psychological Review,91, 417–447.
Shepard, R. N. (1994). Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 2–28.
Shiffrar, M. M., &Shepard, R. N. (1991). Comparison of cube rotations around axes inclined relative to the environment or to the cube.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 44–54.
Verfaillie, K., &d’Ydewalle, G. (1991). Representational momentum and event course anticipation in the perception of implied periodical motions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 302–313.
White, H., Minor, S. W., Merrell, J., &Smith, T. (1993). Representational-momentum effects in the cerebral hemispheres.Brain & Cognition,22, 161–170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author thanks two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hubbard, T.L. Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychon Bull Rev 2, 322–338 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210971
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210971