Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of irrelevant location information on performance of visual choice-reaction tasks. We review empirical findings and theoretical explanations from two domains, those of the Simon effect and the spatial Stroop effect, in which stimulus location has been shown to affect reaction time when irrelevant to the task. We then integrate the findings and explanations from the two domains to clarify how and why stimulus location influences performance even when it is uninformative to the correct response. Factors that influence the processing of irrelevant location information include response modality, relative timing with respect to the relevant information, spatial coding, and allocation of attention. The most promising accounts are offered by models in which response selection is a function of (1) strength of association of the irrelevant stimulus information with the response and (2) temporal overlap of the resulting response activation with that produced by the relevant stimulus information.
Article PDF
References
Arend, U., &MWandmacher, J. (1987). On the generality of logical recoding in spatial interference tasks.Acta Psychologica,65, 193–210.
Barber, P. J., O’Leary, M. J., &MSimon, J. R. (1994). Defining stimulus congruity. A rejoinder to Guiard, Hasbroucq, and Possamai (1994).Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,56, 213–215.
Bashinski, H. S., &Bacharach, V. R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 241–248.
Brebner, J. (1979). The compatibility of spatial and non-spatial relationships.Acta Psychologica,43, 23–32.
Clark, H. H., &MBrownell, H. H. (1975). Judging up and down.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 339–352.
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &MMcClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.
Cohen, J. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., &MMcClelland, J. L. (1992). A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity.American Journal of Psychology,105, 239–269.
Craft, J. L., &Simon, J. R. (1970). Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 415–420.
Dalrymple-Alford, E. C. (1968). Interlingual interference in a colornaming task.Psychonomic Science,10, 215–216.
Dalrymple-Alford, E. C. (1972). Associative facilitation and interference in the Stroop color-word task.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 274–276.
Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., &MAzkoul, J. (1972). The locus of interference in the Stroop and related tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 385–388.
De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., &Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 731–750.
Dunbar, K. N., &MMacLeod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 622–639.
Dyer, F. N. (1971). The duration of word meaning responses: Stroop interference for different preexposures of the word.Psychonomic Science,25, 229–231.
Dyer, F. N. (1972). Latencies for movement naming with congruent and incongruent word stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 377–380.
Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes.Memory & Cognition,1, 106–120.
Dyer, F. N. (1974). Stroop interference with long preexposures of the word: Comparison of pure and mixed preexposure sequences.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,3, 8–10.
Eriksen, C. W., &MHoffman, J. E. (1972). Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 169–171.
Flowers, J. H., &MStoup, C. M. (1977). Selective attention between words, shapes and colors in speeded classification and vocalization tasks.Memory & Cognition,5, 299–307.
Fox, L. A., Shor, R. E., &Steinman, R. J. (1971). Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction, and numerosity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 59–65.
Glaser, M. O., &MDolt, M. O. (1977). A functional model to localize the conflict underlying the Stroop phenomenon.Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung,39, 287–310.
Glaser, M. O., &MGlaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,8, 875–894.
Glaser, W. R., &MGlaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 13–42.
Goolkasian, P. (1989). Target and distractor processing at several retinal locations.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 231–233.
Greenwald, A. G. (1972). On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility.Journal of Experimental Psychology,94, 52–57.
Grice, G. R., Canham, L., &Boroughs, J. M. (1984). Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 451–463.
Grice, G. R., Canham, L., &Gwynne, J. W. (1984). Absence of a redundant-signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 565–570.
Guiard, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses.Journal of Motor Behavior,15, 331–342.
Guiard, Y., Hasbroucq, T., &MPossamai, C.-A. (1994). Stimulus congruity, irrelevant spatial SR correspondence, and display-control arrangement correspondence.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,56, 210–212.
Harvey, N. (1984). The Stroop effect: Failure to focus attention or failure to maintain focusing?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36, 89–115.
Hasbroucq, T., &MGuiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 246–266.
Hasbroucq, T., Guiard, Y., &MKornblum, S. (1989). The additivity of stimulus-response compatibility with the effects of sensory and motor factors in a tactile choice reaction time task.Acta Psychologica,72, 139–144.
Hasbroucq, T., &MPossamai, C.-A. (1994). What can a precue enhance? An analysis of the experiments of Proctor, Lu, and Van Zandt (1992).Acta Psychologica,85, 235–244.
Hedge, A., &MMarsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time.Acta Psychologica,39, 427–439.
Hock, H. S., &MEgeth, H. (1970). Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 299–303.
Hoffman, J. E., &MNelson, B. (1981). Spatial selectivity in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 283–290.
Hommel, B. (1993a, November).The effects of spatial cues on visual attention, response selection, and spatial compatibility. Poster presented at the 34th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
Hommel, B. (1993b). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,55, 270–279.
Hommel, B. (1993c). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,55, 280–290.
Hommel, B. (1993d). The role of attention for the Simon effect.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,55, 208–222.
Hommel, B. (1994a). Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,56, 185–195.
Hommel, B. (1994b). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,56, 261–268.
Hommel, B. (in press). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
James, W. (1950).The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)
Jonides, J., &Mack, R. (1984). On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit.Psychological Bulletin,96, 29–44.
Keele, S. (1972). Attention demands of memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 245–248.
Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming.American Journal of Psychology,77, 576–588.
Kornblum, S. (1992). Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. In G. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.),Tutorials in motor behavior II (pp. 743–777). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simonlike stimuli.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,56, 130–135.
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., &MOsman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy.Psychological Review,97, 253–270.
Lamberts, K., Tavernier, G., &d’Ydewalle, G. (1992). Effect of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.Acta Psychologica,79, 115–130.
Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data.Cognitive Psychology,12, 523–553.
Logan, G. D. (1994). Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1015–1036.
Logan, G. D., &MZbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task.Memory & Cognition,7, 166–174.
Logan, G. D., &MZbrodoff, N. J. (1982). Constraints on strategy construction in a speeded discrimination task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 502–520.
Logan, G. D., Zbrodoff, N. J., &Fostey, A. R. W. (1983). Costs and benefits of strategy construction in a speeded discrimination task.Memory & Cognition,11, 485–493.
Lu, C.-H., &Proctor, R. W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 286–298.
Lu, C.-H., &Proctor, R. W. (1995).Effects of S-R association strength and relative timing on the processing of relevant and irrelevant information. Manuscript submitted for publication.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109 (2), 163–203.
MacLeod, C. M., &Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 126–135.
McCann, R. S., &MJohnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 471–484.
McClain, L. (1983). Stimulus-response compatibility affects auditory Stroop interference.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 266–270.
Melara, R. D., &MMounts, J. R. W. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice.Memory & Cognition,21, 627–645.
Mewaldt, S. P., Connelly, C. L., &MSimon, J. R. (1980). Response selection in choice reaction time: Test of a buffer model.Memory & Cognition,8, 606–611.
Mewhort, D. J. K., Braun, J. G., &MHeathcote, A. (1992). Response time distributions and the Stroop task: A test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 872–882.
Morton, J., &MChambers, S. M. (1973). Selective attention to words and colours.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 387–397.
Nicoletti, R., Anzola, G. P., Luppino, G., Rizzolatti, G., &MUmiltà, C. (1982). Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 664–673.
Nicoletti, R., &Umiltà, C. (1989). Splitting visual space with attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 164–169.
Nicoletti, R., &MUmiltà, C. (1994). Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,56, 144–150.
Nissen, M. J. (1985). Accessing features and objects: Is location special? In M. I. Posner & D. S. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 205–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Leary, M. J., &MBarber, P. J. (1993). Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 830–844.
O’Leary, M. J., &MBarber, P. J. (1994). Stimulus congruence and the Simon effect.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,56, 196–202.
O’Leary, M. J., Barber, P. J., &MSimon, J. R. (1994). Does stimulus correspondence account for the Simon effect? Comments on Hasbroucq and Guiard (1991).Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,56, 203–209.
Palef, S. R. (1978). Judging pictorial and linguistic aspects of space.Memory & Cognition,6, 70–75.
Palef, S. R., &MOlson, D. R. (1975). Spatial and verbal rivalry in a Stroop-like task.Canadian Journal of Psychology,29, 201–209.
Phaf, R. H., Van der Heijden, A. H. C., &Hudson, P. T. W. (1990). SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks.Cognitive Psychology,22, 273–341.
Posner, M. I. (1978).chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., &MDavidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G., Hommel, B., &Vogt, S. (1993). Handlugen als Ereignese. In D. Dörner & E. van der Meer (Eds.),Gedächtnis. Trends, probleme, perspektiven. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Proctor, R. W. (1978). Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 413–419.
Proctor, R. W. (1981). A unified theory for matching task phenomena.Psychological Review,88, 291–326.
Proctor, R. W., &MDutta, A. (1993). Do the same stimulus-response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 922–930.
Proctor, R. W., &MLu, C.-H. (1994). Referential coding and attention shifting accounts of the Simon effect.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,56, 185–195.
Proctor, R. W., Lu, C.-H., &Van Zandt, T. (1992). Enhancement of the Simon effect by response precuing.Acta Psychologica,74, 53–74.
Proctor, R. W.,Lu, C.-H.,Wang, H., &Dutta, A. (in press). Activation of response codes to varying degrees by relevant and irrelevant information.Acta Psychologica.
Proctor, R. W., &Reeve, T. G. (Eds.) (1990).Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Riggio, L., Gawryszewski, L. G., &MUmiltà, C. (1986). What is crossed in crossed-hand effects?Acta Psychologica,62, 89–100.
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1986). A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & PDP Research Group (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 318–362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schneider, W., &Fisk, A. D. (1982). Degree of consistent training: Improvements in search performance and automatic process development.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 160–168.
Seymour, P. H. (1973). Stroop interference in naming and verifying spatial locations.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 95–100.
Shiffrin, R. M., &MSchneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory.Psychological Review,84, 127–190.
Shimamura, A. P. (1987). Word comprehension and naming: An analysis of English and Japanese orthographies.American Journal of Psychology,100, 15–40.
Shor, R. E. (1970). The processing of conceptual information on spatial directions from pictorial and linguistic symbols.Acta Psychologica,32, 346–365.
Shor, R. E., Hatch, R. P., Hudson, L. J., Landrigan, D. T., &MShaffer, H. J. (1972). Effect of practice on a Stroop-like spatial directions task.Journal of Experimental Psychology,94, 168–172.
Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.),Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Jr.,Mewaldt, S. P., &Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 16–22.
Simon, J. R., &Berbaum, K. (1990). Effect of conflicting cues: The “Stroop effect” vs. the “Simon effect.”Acta Psychologica,73, 159–170.
Simon, J. R., &MCraft, J. L. (1972). Reaction time in an oddity task: Responding to the different element of a three-light display.Journal of Experimental Psychology,92, 405–411.
Simon, J. R., Craft, J. L., &MWebster, J. B. (1973). Reactions toward the stimulus source: Analysis of correct responses and errors over a five-day period.Journal of Experimental Psychology,101, 175–178.
Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., &MCraft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 97–102.
Simon, J. R., &MRudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.Journal of Applied Psychology,51, 300–304.
Simon, J. R., Sly, P. E., &MVilapakkam, S. (1981). Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reaction toward the stimulus source.Acta Psychologica,47, 63–81.
Simon, J. R., &MSmall, A. M., Jr. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue.Journal of Applied Psychology,53, 433–435.
Simon, J. R., Small, A. M., Jr.,Ziglar, R. A., &MCraft, J. L. (1970). Response interference in an information processing task: Sensory versus perceptual factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology,85, 311–314.
Smith, M. C. (1967). Theories of the psychological refractory period.Psychological Bulletin,67, 202–213.
Spijkers, W. A. C. (1990). Response selection and motor programming: Effects of compatibility and average velocity. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.),Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 297–309). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method.Acta Psychologica,30, 276–315.
Stoffels, E. J. (1995).On stage robustness and response selection routes: Further evidence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Stoffels, E. J., van der Molen, M. W., &MKeuss, P. J. G. (1989). An additive factors analysis of the effects of location cues associated with auditory stimuli on stages of information processing.Acta Psychologica,70, 161–197.
Stoffer, T. (1991). Attentional focusing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,53, 127–135.
Stoffer, T., &MYakin, A. R. (1994). The functional role of attention for spatial coding in the Simon effect.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,56, 151–162.
Stroop, J. R. (1992). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 15–23. (Original work published 1935)
Sugg, M. J., &McDonald, J. E. (1994). Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 647–675.
Treisman, A. M., &MGelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Tsal, Y., &MLavie, N. (1993). Location dominance in attending to color and shape.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 131–139.
Umiltà, C. (1994). The Simon effect: Introductory remarks.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,56, 127–129.
Umiltà, C., &MLiotti, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility.Psychological Research,49, 81–90.
Umiltà, C., &Nicoletti, R. (1985). Attention and coding effects in S-R compatibility due to irrelevant spatial cues. In M. I. Posner & O. S.M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 456–471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Umiltà, C., &Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.),Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89–116). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Umiltà, C., &Nicoletti, R. (1992). An integrated model of the Simon effect. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junca de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.),Analytic approach to human cognition (pp. 331–350). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Van Duren, L., &Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs.Acta Psychologica,69, 83–94.
Van Zandt, T., &Townsend, J. T. (1993). Self-terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search: An evaluative review.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 563–580.
Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., &Heilman, K. M. (1988). Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects.Neuropsychologia,26, 435–444.
Virzi, R. A., &MEgeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference.Memory & Cognition,13, 304–319.
Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.Journal of Experimental Psychology,88, 354–360.
Wallace, R. J. (1972). Spatial S-R compatibility effects involving kinesthetic cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 163–168.
Warren, R. E. (1972). Stimulus encoding and memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,94, 90–100.
Weeks, D. J.,Chua, R., &Hamblin, K. (in press). Attention shifts and the Simon effect: A failure to replicate Stoffer (1991).Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung.
Weeks, D. J., &Proctor, R. W. (1990). Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 355–366.
White, B. W. (1969). Interference in identifying attributes and attribute names.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 166–168.
Yantis, S., &MJonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We would like to thank Bernhard Hommel, Colin MacLeod, Bob Melara, Jim Neely, Richard Schweickert, Richard Simon, and Howard Zelaznik for helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, Ch., Proctor, R.W. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychon Bull Rev 2, 174–207 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210959
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210959