Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 504–510 | Cite as

Can a machine tickle?

Brief Reports

Abstract

It has been observed at least since the time of Aristotle that people cannot tickle themselves, but the reason remains elusive. Two sorts of explanations have been suggested. Theinterpersonal explanation suggests that tickling is fundamentally interpersonal and thus requires another person as the source of the touch. Thereflex explanation suggests that tickle simply requires an element of unpredictability or uncontrollability and is more like a reflex or some other stereotyped motor pattern. To test these explanations, we manipulated the perceived source of tickling. Thirty-five subjects were tickled twice-once by the experimenter, and once, they believed, by an automated machine. The reflex view predicts that our “tickle machine” should be as effective as a person in producing laughter, whereas the interpersonal view predicts significantly attenuated responses. Supporting the reflex view, subjects smiled, laughed, and wiggled just as often in response to the machine as to the experimenter. Self-reports of ticklishness were also virtually identical in the two conditions. Ticklish laughter evidently does not require that the stimulation be attributed to another person, as interpersonal accounts imply.

References

  1. Bacon, F. (1677).Sylva sylvarum: or A natural history. London: S. G. & B. Griffin.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, G. W. (1996). Ethological units of behavior. In L. Houck & L. Drickamer (Eds.),Foundations of animal behavior: Classic papers with commentaries (pp. 138–153). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Black, D. W. (1984). Laughter.Journal of the American Medical Association,252, 2995–2998.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley, M. M., Lang, P. J., &Cuthbert, B. N. (1993). Emotion, novelty, and the startle reflex: Habituation in humans.Behavioral Neuroscience,107, 970–980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Claxton, G. (1975). Why can’t we tickle ourselves?Perceptual & Motor Skills,41, 335–338.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, L. (Trans.) (1922).An Aristotelian theory of comedy with an adaptation of the poetics and a translation of the Tractatus coislinianus. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  7. Darwin, C. (1965).The expressions of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1873)Google Scholar
  8. DeSanto, V. R.,Newman, B., &Hemmes, N. S. (1997).The effects of perceived aversiveness on habituation to stimulus in human subjects. Poster presented at the 23rd annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Foot, H. C., &Chapman, A. J. (1976). The social responsiveness of young children in humorous situations. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 187–214). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Freedman, B. J. (1989). Now it tickles; now it doesn’t: Psychogenic variations in the perception of tactile stimuli.British Medical Journal,299, 250.Google Scholar
  11. Fridlund, A. J., &Loftis, J. M. (1990). Relations between tickling and humorous laugher: Preliminary support for the Darwin-Hecker hypothesis.Biological Psychology,30, 141–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall, G. S., &Allin, A. (1897). The psychology of tickling, laughing, and the comic.American Journal of Psychology,9, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, C. R. (1999). The mystery of ticklish laughter.American Scientist,87, 344–351.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, C. R., &Christenfeld, N. (1997). Humour, tickle, and the Darwin-Hecker hypothesis.Cognition & Emotion,11, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keith-Spiegel, P. (1972). Early conceptions of humor: Varieties and issues. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.),The psychology of humor (pp. 4–39). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Koestler, A. (1964).The act of creation. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  17. Laughter. (1912).Edinburgh Review,215, 383–404.Google Scholar
  18. Levine, J. (1979). Humor and psychopathology. In C. Izard (Ed.),Emotions in personality and psychopathology (pp. 37–69). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  19. Leuba, C. (1941). Tickling and laughter: Two genetic studies.Journal of Genetic Psychology,58, 201–209.Google Scholar
  20. McKimmin, P. J. (1989).Tickle sensation, pleasure, anxiety and the role of perceived control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego.Google Scholar
  21. Newman, B., O’Grady, M. A., Ryan, C. S., &Hemmes, N. S. (1993). Pavlovian conditioning of the tickle response of human subjects: Temporal and delay conditioning.Perceptual & Motor Skills,77, 779–785.Google Scholar
  22. Provine, R. R. (1993). Laughter punctuates speech: Linguistic, social, and gender contexts of laugher.Ethology,95, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Provine, R. R. (1996). Laughter.American Scientist,84, 38–45.Google Scholar
  24. Provine, R. R. (1997). Yawns, laughs, smiles, tickles, and talking: Naturalistic and laboratory studies of facial action and social communication. In J. A. Russell & J. M Fernandez-Dols (Eds.),The psychology of facial expression (pp. 158–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Shepherd, G. M. (1994).Neurobiology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Shultz, T. R. (1976). A cognitive-developmental analysis of humour. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 12–36). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Stearns, F. R. (1972).Laughing. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  28. Sully, J. (1902).An essay on laughter. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
  29. Weiskrantz, L., Elliot, J., &Darlington, C. (1971). Preliminary observations on tickling oneself.Nature,230, 598–599.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology-0109University of CaliforniaSan Diego, La Jolla

Personalised recommendations