Abstract
How the distribution of resources affects the spatial distribution of animals is a central concern of behavioral ecology. One influential model relating population dynamics to individual foraging behavior is that of ideal free distribution (Fretwell & Lucas, 1970). This model assumes foragers of equal competitive abilities, moving freely from one habitat to another; the choices made by each individual subject are supposed to equalize gains across habitats. The resulting distribution at the group level, or ideal free distribution, has been tested with various animal species. Here we report an experimental test with human subjects competing for money. The results approximate those predicted by the ideal free model, the degree of approximation being consistent with that obtained in other species. This similarity of results supports the application of behavioral ecology models to human performance.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cashdan, E. (1992). Spatial organization and habitat use. In E. A. Smith & B. Winterhalder (Eds.),Evolutionary ecology and human behavior (pp. 237–266). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Cézilly, F., &Boy, V. (1991). Ideal free distribution and individual decision rules: A Bayesian approach.Acta OEcologia,12, 403–410.
Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.Theoretical Population Biology,9, 129–136.
Commons, M. L., Herrnstein, R. J., &Rachlin, H. (Eds.) (1982).Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 2. Matching and maximizing accounts. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Davison, M., &McCarthy, D. (1988).The matching law: A research review. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fagen, R. (1987). A generalized habitat matching rule.Evolutionary Ecology,1, 5–10.
Fretwell, S. D., &Lucas, H. L., Jr. (1970). On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds.Acta Biotheoretica,19, 16–36.
Gallistel, C. R. (1993).The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gillis, D. M., Peterman, R. M., &Tyler, A. V. (1993). Movement dynamics in a fishery: Application of the ideal free distribution to spatial allocation of effort.Canadian Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences,50, 323–333.
Godin, J.-G. J., &Keenleyside, M. H. A. (1984). Foraging on patchily distributed prey by a cichlid fish (Teleostei, Cichlidae): A test of the ideal free distribution theory.Animal Behaviour,32, 120–131.
Gray, R. D. (1994). Sparrows, matching and the ideal free distribution: Can biological and psychological approaches be synthesized?.Animal Behaviour,48, 411–423.
Harley, C. B. (1981). Learning the evolutionary stable strategy.Journal of Theoretical Biology,89, 611–633.
Harper, D. G. C. (1982). Competitive foraging in mallards: “Ideal free” ducks.Animal Behaviour,30, 575–584.
Hassell, M. P., &Varley, G. C. (1969). New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control.Nature,223, 1133–1137.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1990). Behavior, reinforcement and utility.Psychological Science,1, 217–224.
Honig, W. K. (1993). Numerosity as a dimension of stimulus control. In S. T. Boysen & E. J. Capaldi (Eds.),The development of numerical competence: Animal and human models (pp. 61–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Houston, A. I., &McNamara, J. M. (1988). The ideal free distribution when competitive abilities differ: An approach based on statistical mechanics.Animal Behaviour,36, 166–174.
Houston, A. I., &Sumida, B. H. (1987). Learning rules, matching and frequency dependence.Journal of Theoretical Biology,126, 289–308.
Kennedy, M., &Gray, R. D. (1993). Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the Ideal Free Distribution.Oikos,68, 158–166.
Kraft, J., &Baum, W. M. (1996, May).Choice in a flock of pigeons: Testing the ideal free distribution. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of the Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, San Francisco.
Lamb, A. E., &Ollason, J. G. (1993). Foraging wood-antsFormica aquilonia Yarrow (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) tend to adopt the ideal free distribution.Behavioural Processes,28, 189–198.
Mazur, J. E. (1981). Optimization theory fails to predict performance of pigeons in a two-response situation.Science,214, 823–825.
Milinski, M. (1984). Competitive resource sharing: An experimental test of a learning rule for ESSs.Animal Behaviour,32, 233–242.
Pulliam, H. R., &Caraco, T. (1984). Living in groups: Is there an optimal group size? In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.),Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (2nd ed., pp. 122–147). Oxford: Blackwell.
Staddon, J. E. R., &Hinson, J. M. (1983). Optimization: A result or a mechanism?.Science,221, 976–977.
Sutherland, W. J. (1983). Aggregation and the “ideal free” distribution.Journal of Animal Ecology,52, 821–828.
Sutherland, W. J. (1996).From individual behaviour to population ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tregenza, T. (1995). Building on the ideal free distribution. In A. H. Fitter & M. Begon (Eds.),Advances in ecological research (Vol. 26, pp. 253–307). New York: Academic Press.
Vaughan, W., Jr. (1981). Melioration, matching, and maximization.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,36, 141–149.
Whitehead, M., &Hope, P. L. (1990). Sperm whalers off the Galápagos islands and in the Western North Pacific, 1830–1850: Ideal free whalers?Ethology & Sociobiology,12, 147–161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The data of the 20-subject group were part of a poster on the ideal free distribution, presented at the 1996 annual meeting of ARC (Association pour la Recherche Cognitive). We thank Claudine Boyer, Bruno Broutin, Fabrice Clin, Karine Gravelin, and Jean-Louis Monestes for their help in running the experiments. We also thank William Baum, Franck Cézilly, Reid Hastie, Joel Myerson, and an anonymous reviewer for their comments on the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sokolowski, M.B.C., Tonneau, F. & Freixa i Baqué, E. The ideal free distribution in humans: An experimental test. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6, 157–161 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210824
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210824