The independence of delay-discounting rate and monetary reward size was tested by offering subjects (N = 621) a series of choices between immediate rewards and larger, delayed rewards. In contrast to previous studies, in which hypothetical rewards have typically been employed, subjects in the present study were entered into a lottery in which they had a chance of actually receiving one of their choices. The delayed rewards were grouped into small ($30–$35), medium ($55–$65), and large amounts ($70–$85). Using a novel parameter estimation procedure, we estimated discounting rates for all three reward sizes for each subject on the basis of his/her pattern of choices. The data indicated that the discounting rate is a decreasing function of the size of the delayed reward (p < .0001), whether hyperbolic or exponential discounting functions are assumed. In addition, a reliable gender difference was found (p = .005), with males discounting at higher rates than females, on average.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ainslie, G. (1974). Impulse control in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,21, 485–489.
Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.Psychological Bulletin,82, 463–496.
Ainslie, G. (1992).Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benzion, U., Rapoport, A., &Yagil, J. (1989). Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study.Management Science,35, 270–284.
Eysenck, S. B., Easting, G., &Pearson, P. R. (1984). Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in children.Personality & Individual Differences,5, 315–321.
Green, L., Fisher, E. B., Perlow, S., &Sherman, L. (1981). Preference reversal and self-control: Choice as a function of reward amount and delay.Behaviour Analysis Letters,1, 43–51.
Green, L., Fristoe, N., &Myerson, J. (1994). Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 383–389.
Green, L., Fry, A., &Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life span comparison.Psychological Science,5, 33–36.
Green, L., &Myerson, J. (1993). Alternative frameworks for the analysis of self-control.Behavior & Philosophy,21, 37–47.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1981). Self-control as response strength. In C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, & C. F. Lowe (Eds.),Quantification of steadystate operant behavior (pp. 3–20). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North- Holland.
Kirby, K. N., &Herrnstein, R. J. (1995). Preference reversals due to myopic discounting of delayed reward.Psychological Science,6, 83–89.
Kirby, K. N., &Maraković, N. N. (1995). Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,64, 22–30.
Loewenstein, G. (1992). The fall and rise of psychological explanations in the economics of intertemporal choice. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.),Choice over time (pp. 3–34). New York: Russell Sage.
Logue, A. W. (1988). Research on self-control: An integrating framework.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,11, 665–679.
Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rachlin, H. (1990). Why do people gamble and keep gambling despite heavy losses?Psychological Science,1, 294–297.
Rachlin, H. (1992). Diminishing marginal value as delay discounting. Special Issue: Behavior dynamics.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,57, 407–415.
Rachlin, H., &Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice and self-control.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,17, 15–22.
Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., &Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,55, 233–244.
Raineri, A., &Rachlin, H. (1993). The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,6, 77–94.
Salkind, N. J., &Poggio, J. P. (1978). Sex differences in impulsivity and intellectual ability.Sex Roles,4, 91–96.
Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility.Review of Economic Studies,4, 155–161.
Stevenson, M. K. (1986). A discounting model for decisions with delayed positive or negative outcomes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 131–154.
Stevenson, M. K. (1993). Decision making with long-term consequences: Temporal discounting for single and multiple outcomes in the future.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 3–22.
Strotz, R. H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization.Review of Economic Studies,23, 165–180.
Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency.Economic Letters,8, 201–207.
Thaler, R. H., &Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An economic theory of selfcontrol.Journal of Political Economy,89, 392–406.
About this article
Cite this article
Kirby, K.N., MarakoviĆ, N.N. Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3, 100–104 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210748
- Discount Rate
- Delay Discount
- Choice Trial
- Hyperbolic Discount
- Parameter Estimation Procedure