Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article

The reverse Stroop effect

  • Brief Reports
  • Published: March 2000
  • Volume 7, pages 121–125, (2000)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript
The reverse Stroop effect
Download PDF
  • Frank H. Durgin1 
  • 11k Accesses

  • 66 Citations

  • 4 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

In classic Stroop interference, manual or oral identification of sensory colors presented as incongruent color words is delayed relative to simple color naming. In the experiment reported here, this effect was shown to all but disappear when the response was simply to point to a matching patch of color. Conversely, strong reverse Stroop interference occurred with the pointing task. That is, when the sensory color of a color word was incongruent with that word, responses to color words were delayed by an average of 69 msec relative to a word presented in gray. Thus, incongruently colored words interfere strongly with pointing to a color patch named by the words, but little interference from incongruent color words is found when the goal is to match the color of the word. These results suggest that Stroop effects arise from response compatibility of irrelevant information rather than automatic processing or habit strength.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., &Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 221–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmiel, N. (1984). Phonological encoding for reading: The effect of concurrent articulation in a Stroop task.British Journal of Psychology,75, 213–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egeth, H. E., Blecker, D. L., &Kamlet, A. S. (1969). Verbal interference in a perceptual comparison task.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 355–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M., &Posner, M. I. (1967).Human performance. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, J. H. (1975). “Sensory” interference in a word-color matching task.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, J. H., Warner, J. L., &Polansky, M. L. (1979). Response and encoding factors in “ignoring” irrelevant information.Memory & Cognition,7, 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. (1972). Attention demands of memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 245–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Review,109, 163–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. (1981). Reverse Stroop effect with concurrent tasks.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,17, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClain, L. (1983). Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color-word performance.Perceptual & Motor Skills,56, 735–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J., &Chambers, S. M. (1973). Selective attention to words and colours.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchatt, D. (1968). An investigation into some of the underlying associative verbal processes of the Stroop colour effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 351–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., &Clive, P. B. (1983). Two forms of the Stroop test.Perceptual & Motor Skills,57, 879–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tecce, J. J., &Happ, S. J. (1964). Effects of shock-arousal on a card-sorting test of color-word interference.Perceptual & Motor Skills,19, 905–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M., &Fearnley, S. (1969). The Stroop test: Selective attention to colours and words.Nature,222, 437–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uleman, J. S., &Reeves, J. (1971). A reversal of the Stroop interference effect, through scanning.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 293–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virzi, R. A., &Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference.Memory & Cognition,13, 304–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, 19081, Swarthmore, PA

    Frank H. Durgin

Authors
  1. Frank H. Durgin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank H. Durgin.

Additional information

This work was supported by a Swarthmore Faculty Research Grant and by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. I thank Evoni Story and Richa Jain for running the experimental subjects. I also thank Derek Besner, John Flowers, Joel Lachter, Neill Trammell, John Wixted, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durgin, F.H. The reverse Stroop effect. Psychon Bull Rev 7, 121–125 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210730

Download citation

  • Received: 02 November 1998

  • Accepted: 24 March 1999

  • Issue Date: March 2000

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210730

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Stroop Task
  • Incongruent Trial
  • Color Word
  • Stroop Effect
  • Irrelevant Dimension
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

5.135.140.155

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature