Abstract
Both alcohol and practice affect choice reaction time. The present study was conducted to investigate the possibility that impairment from alcohol and improvement with practice could be attributed to changes in the efficiency of control mechanisms (Rabbitt, 1979a), some of which depend upon the ability to judge response speed accurately. Twenty subjects participated in a four-choice reaction time experiment in which they received no alcohol (NA) in Session 1 and either no alcohol (10 subjects) or 0.8 ml alcohol (A) per kilogram of body weight (10 subjects) in Session 2. The task was to respond as fast and as accurately as possible to each stimulus. In addition, subjects were required to press a fifth key after any response that they considered to be both fast and accurate. Subjects had no difficulty in performing this task: (1) there was a significant difference of 122 msec between the mean response time for correct responses indicated as fast and that for correct responses not indicated as fast, and (2) subjects indicated 1 in 4 correct responses but only 1 in 64 errors. Alcohol increased all response times by approximately 40 msec. In contrast, practice decreased response times less for correct responses not indicated as fast than for correct responses indicated as fast. The ability to distinguish between fast and slow responses was thus unaffected by alcohol, but was improved by practice. Responses indicated as “fast” were significantly faster than errors, and appeared to occur without warning (unlike errors, which tended to end a sequence of increasingly fast correct responses). The results suggest that alcohol and practice influence choice reaction time in qualitatively different ways: Alcohol impairs overall response speed but has no effect on the ability to judge response speed, whereas practice improves both.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jennings, J. R., Wood, C. C., &Lawrence, B. E. (1976). Effects of graded doses of alcohol on speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 85–91.
Laming, D. (1968).Information theory of choice reaction times. London: Academic Press.
Maylor, E. A., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1987). Effects of alcohol and practice on choice reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 465–475.
Maylor, E. A., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Relationship between rate of preparation for, and processing of, an event requiring a choice response.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 47–62.
Maylor, E. A., Rabbitt, P. M. A., Sahgal, A., &Wright, C. (1987). Effects of alcohol on speed and accuracy in choice reaction time and visual search.Acta Psychologica,65, 147–163.
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology,71, 264–272.
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1968). Three kinds of error-signalling responses in a serial choice task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 179–188.
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1979a). Current paradigms and models in human information processing. In V H. Hamilton & D. M. Warburton (Eds.),Human stress and cognition: An information processing approach (pp. 115–140). New York: Wiley.
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1979b). How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed.British Journal of Psychology,70, 305–311.
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1980). A fresh look at changes in reaction times in old age. In E. Stein (Ed.),The psychobiology of aging: Problems and perspectives (pp. 425–442). Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.
Rabbitt, P. M. A., &Goward, L. (1986). Effects of age and raw IQ test scores on mean correct and mean error reaction times in serial choice tasks: A reply to Smith and Brewer.British Journal of Psychology,77, 69–73.
Rabbitt, P. M. A., &Vyas, S. M. (1970). An elementary preliminary taxonomy for some errors in laboratory choice RT tasks.Acta Psychologica,33, 56–76.
Sanford, A. J. (1970) Rating the speed of a simple reaction.Psychonomic Science,21, 333–334.
Schouten, J. F., &Bekker, J. A. M. (1967).Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica,27, 143–153.
Shepherd, M. (1984). EMDISP: A visual display system with digital and analogue sampling.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,16, 297–302.
Wilkinson, R. T., &Colquhoun, W. P. (1968). Interaction of alcohol with incentive and with sleep deprivation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 623–629.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant G8221479 from the Medical Research Council of Great Britain.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maylor, E.A., Rabbitt, P.M.A. & Connolly, S.A.V. Rate of processing and judgment of response speed: Comparing the effects of alcohol and practice. Perception & Psychophysics 45, 431–438 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210717
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210717