Advertisement

Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 45–46 | Cite as

On relations among perceptual and cognitive measures of information processing

  • Peter Suedfeld
  • Silvan S. Tomkins
  • William H. Tucker
Information Processing
  • 167 Downloads

Abstract

Tests of visual information processing and verbal information processing were administered to 178 Ss. Intercorrelations showed low positive relationships between two sets of two cognitive measures each, the Sentence Completion Test (Schroder, Driver, & Streufert, 1967) and the Interpersonal Topical Inventory (Tuckman, 1965), and the Interpersonal Topical Inventory and the Polarity Scale (1965), and a high negative correlation between preference for highly complex and for moderately complex visual stimuli. Factor analysis showed three reliable major factors. There was little evidence for a relationship between perceptual and cognitive processing characteristics, which indicates some danger for general theorists.

References

  1. BARRON, F. Complexity-simplicity as a personality dimension. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 1953, 48, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. GARNER, W. R.Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley, 1962.Google Scholar
  3. GARNER, W. R., & Hake, H. W. The amount of information in absolute judgments. Psychological Review, 1951, 58, 446–459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. HYMAN, R. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Joumal of Experimental Psychology, 1953, 45, 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. MILLER, G. A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 1956, 63, 81–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. MUNSINGER, H., & KESSEN, W. Uncertainty, structure, and preference. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 1964, 78 (Whole No. 586), 1–24.Google Scholar
  7. MUNSINGER, H., & KESSEN, W. Stimulus variability and cognitive change. Psychological Review, 1966, 73, 164–178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. SCHRODER, H. M., DRIVER, M. J., & STREUFERT, S.Human information processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1967.Google Scholar
  9. SCHRODER, H. M., & STREUFERT, S. The measurement of four systems varying in level of abstractness (sentence completion method). ONR Technical Report, 1962, No. 11.Google Scholar
  10. SCHRODER, H. M., & SUEDFELD, P. (Eds.)Personality: Information processing models. New York: Ronald Press, in press.Google Scholar
  11. TOMKINS, S. S.Polarity scale (4th Ed.). New York: Springer, 1964.Google Scholar
  12. TOMKINS, S. S. Affect and the psychology of knowledge. In S. S. Tomkins and C. E. Izard (Eds.),Affect, cognition and personality: Empirical studies. New York: Springer, 1965. Pp. 72–97,Google Scholar
  13. TUCKMAN, B. W. Integrative complexity and attitudinal orientation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1965, 21, 838.Google Scholar
  14. TUCKMAN, B. W. Integrative complexity: Its measurement and relation to creativity. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 1966, 26, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. VANNOY, J. S. Generality of cognitive complexity-simplicity as a personality construct. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. WITKIN, H. A., LEWIS, H. B., HERTZMAN, M., MACHOVER, K., MEISSNER, P. B., & WAGNER, S.Personality through perception: An experimental and clinical study. New York: Harper, 1954.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Suedfeld
    • 1
  • Silvan S. Tomkins
    • 1
  • William H. Tucker
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyRutgers, The State UniversityNew Brunswick
  2. 2.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations