Abstract
The present study was conducted to assess the effects of S-R uncertainty on performance in watchkeeping and typical type-b choice-reaction situations. The assessment was based in part on measurements of S-R compatibility effects in the two performance conditions. Four levels of S-R uncertainty (1, 2, 3 and 4 bits/S-R event) were combined factorially with two levels of S-R compatibility (high and low) and the two kinds of tasks (watchkeeping and choice-reaction); 12 Ss were assigned at random to each of the 16 conditions. A matrix of lights was used as stimuli in the choice-reaction condition; Ss monitored the matrix for a I-h duration in the watchkeeping condition. In both tasks, Ss responded by pressing a corresponding key after the presentation of a stimulus or “critical signal.” Reaction time (RT) was found to be an increas ing linear function of S-R uncertainty in both tasks. and the effects of S-R compatibility were essentially identical in the two. However, choice reactions were significantly faster than watchkeeping responses, and the rate of gain of information in watchkeeping was greater than in the comparable choice-reaction situations. The results are interpreted as supporting the hypothesis that watchkeeping differs from the simpler choice-reaction task principally in presenting an additional source of (temporal) uncertainty for information processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alluisi, E. A. Attention and vigilance as mechanisms of response: Comments on Professor Adams’ paper. In E. A. Bilodean (Ed.),Acquisition of skill. New York: Academic Press, 1966. PP. 201–213.
Alluisi, E. A., Strain, G. S., &Thurmond, J. B. Stimulus-response compatibility and the rate of gain of information.Psychon, Sci., 1964, 1, 111–112.
Attneave, F.Applications of information theory to psychology: A summary of basic concepts. methods. and results. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1959.
Brainard, R. W., Irby, T. S., Fitts.P. M., &Alluisi, E. A. Some variables influencing the rate of gain of information.J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 105–110.
Chinn.R. McC., &Alluisi.E. A. Effect of three kinds of knowledge-of-results information on three measures of vigilance performance.Percept. mot. Skills, 1964, 18, 901–912.
Deininger, R. L., &Fitts, P. M. Stimulus-response compatibility, information theory, and perceptual-motor performance. In H. Quastler (Ed.).Information theory in psychology. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1955.
Fitts, P. M., &Switzer, G. Cognitive aspects of information processing: I. The familiarity of S-R sets and subsets.J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 321–329.
Grant, D. A. Analysis-of-variance tests in the analysis and comparison of curves.Psychol. Bull., 1956, 53. 141–154.
Gamer, W. R., &Hake, H. W. The amount of information in absolute judgements.Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 446–459.
Gregg, L. W. The effects of stimulus complexity on discrimination response.J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 48, 289–297.
Hick, W. E. On the rate of gain of information.Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 4, 11–26.
Hyman, R. Stimulus information as a determinate of reaction time.J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 188–196.
Klemmer, E. T., & Muller, P. F. The rate of handling information: Key pressing responses to light patterns.USAF HFORL memo. Rep, 1953. No. 34.
Kulp, R. A. Effects of stimulus-response uncertainty on performance of a watchkeeping task. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Louisville. 1966.
Leonard, J. A. The effects of partial advance information.Med. Res. Coun. Appl. Psychol. Unit (G. Brit.) Rep., 1954, No. 217/54.
Mackworth, N. H. Researches on the measurement of human performance.Med. Res. Coun, (G. Brit.) Spec. Rep. Ser., 1950, No. 268.
Mowbray, G. H., &Rhoades, M. Y. On the reduction of choice reaction time’ with practice.Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 11, 16–23.
Mowbray, G. H. Choice reaction times for skilled responses.Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 12, 193–202.
Smith, R. P. The effects of signal density and signal variability on the efficiency of human vigilance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University. 1961.
Smith, R. P., Warm, J. S., &Alluisi, E. A. Effects of ternpor al uncertainty on watchkeeping performance.Percept. & Psychophys., 1966, 1, 293–299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulp, R.A., Alluisi, E.A. Effects of stimulus-response uncertainty on watchkeeping performance and choice reactions. Perception & Psychophysics 2, 511–515 (1967). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210256
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210256