Advertisement

Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 6, Issue 5, pp 257–266 | Cite as

Processing of tachistoscopic displays with controlled order of characters and spaces

  • Peter Shaw
Article
  • 183 Downloads

Abstract

The task used was designed to force Ss consistently to process the letters of a tachistoscopic display in the same spatial order, if Ss are able to process the letters in a brief display serially and if Ss have enough voluntary control over the selection of a processing order to use the order chosen by the E. In the main series of experiments the set of slides shown in each session included slides having a blank space in some position in the linear array of letters. For control, no-blank slides, a sharp, monotonic decrease in the percentage of correct detections of a signal letter with distance of the signal letter from the focusing dot was obtained. An unexpected result from the slides having a blank space was that detection of the signal letter was considerably more accurate on the slides having a blank space immediately following the signal letter than on the control slides having no blank space or the slides having a blank space immediately before the signal letter in the processing order. In one experiment blank spaces were replaced by black rectangles with no substantial change in the pattern of results. The results from the slides having a blank space or a black rectangle were interpreted as indicating that the onset of processing the image of a letter was determined by the distance in the display from the focusing dot to the letter and that the duration of processing an image of a letter was determined by the distance in the display from the letter to the next letter in the processing order.

Keywords

Detection Performance Processing Order Control Slide Blank Space Noise Letter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ESTES, W. K., & TAYLOR, H. A. A detection method and probabilistic models for assessing information processing from brief visual displays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1964, 52, No.2, 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ESTES, W. K., & TAYLOR, H. A. Visual detection in relation to display size and redundancy of critical elements. Perception & Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 9–16.Google Scholar
  3. ESTES, W. K., & WESSEL, D. L. Reaction time in relation to display size and correctness of response in forced-choice visual signal detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 1966, 1,369–373.Google Scholar
  4. FERGUSON, G. A. Statistical analysis in psychology and education. McGraw-Hill, 1959.Google Scholar
  5. NEISSER, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.Google Scholar
  6. SPERLING, G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 1960,74, No. II (Whole No. 498).Google Scholar
  7. SPERLING, G. A model for visual memory tasks. Human Factors, 1963, 5 19–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. SPERLING, G. Successive approximations to a model for short term memory. Acta Psychologica, 1967, 27, 285–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Shaw
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations