Abstract
Aitken (1999) argues that, in a simultaneous discrimination, reports of the transfer of value from the positive to the negative stimulus can be more readily explained in terms of an artifact produced by the procedure in which differential inhibition accrues to the negative test stimuli during training, together with stimulus generalization (similarity between the positive and negative stimuli). We argue that (1) there is little evidence for differential inhibition, and it often occurs in the wrong direction; (2) value transfer can be demonstrated when differential value is established to the positive stimuli afterdiscrimination training, when differential inhibition is not likely to be a factor; and (3) on both logical and empirical grounds, stimulus similarity does not provide an adequate account of the transfer of value from the positive to the negative stimulus (i.e., the strongest evidence for value transfer occurs when there is least stimulus similarity). We propose that value transfer occurs whenever there is relatively little experience with the negative stimuli. However, when there is extended experience with the negative stimuli, contrast will be found.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitken, M. R. F. (1999). Alternative accounts are preferable to value transfer theory: Commentary on Dorrance, Kaiser, and Zentall (1998).Animal Learning & Behavior,27, 490–493.
Clement, T. S., Weaver, J. E., Sherburne, L. M., &Zentall, T. R. (1998). Simultaneous discrimination learning in pigeons: Value of S− affects the relative value of its associated S+.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51B, 363–378.
Dorrance, B. R., Kaiser, D. H., &Zentall, T. R. (1998). Value transfer in a simultaneous discrimination by pigeons: The value of the S+ is not specific to the simultaneous discrimination context.Animal Learning & Behavior,26, 257–263.
Dorrance, B. R., &Zentall, T. R. (1999). Within-event learning contributes to value transfer in simultaneous instrumental discriminations by pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,27, 206–210.
Fersen, L. von, Wynne, C. D. L., Delius, J. D., &Staddon, J. E. R. (1991). Transitive inference formation in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,17, 334–341.
Guttman, N., &Kalish, H. I. (1956). Discriminability and stimulus generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 79–88.
Hanson, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 321–333.
Zentall, T. R., &Sherburne, L. M. (1994). Transfer of value from S+ to S− in a simultaneous discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,20, 176–183.
Zentall, T. R., Sherburne, L. M., Roper, K. L., &Kraemer, P. J. (1996). Value transfer in a simultaneous discrimination appears to result from within-event Pavlovian conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,22, 68–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of this article was facilitated by Grants MH55118 and MH59194 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zentall, T.R., Dorrance, B.R. & Clement, T.S. Differential inhibition and stimulus generalization cannot account for value transfer in simultaneous discrimination learning by pigeons: Reply to Aitken. Animal Learning & Behavior 27, 494–496 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209985
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209985