Abstract
Repeated exposure to a single target type (sequential priming) during visual search for multiple cryptic targets commonly improves performance on subsequent presentations of that target. It appears to be an attentional phenomenon, a component of the searching image effect. It has been argued, however, that if searching image is an attentional process, sequential priming should also interfere with performance on subsequent nonprimed targets, and such interference has never been unequivocally demonstrated. In blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) searching in an operant apparatus for targets derived from images of cryptic moths, detection performance was strongly facilitated in the course of a sequential prime but was relatively unaffected by sequences of mixed target types. Detection accuracy in subsequent probe trials was enhanced by priming with targets of the same type, whereas accuracy on cryptic probes following priming with a more conspicuous target was significantly degraded. The results support an attentional interpretation of searching image.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, J. A. (1988). Frequency-dependent selection by predators.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,319, 485–503.
Blough, P. M. (1989). Attentional priming and search images in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 211–223.
Blough, P. M. (1991). Selective attention and search images in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,17, 292–298.
Blough, P. M. (1992). Detectability and choice during visual search: Joint effects of sequential priming and discriminability.Animal Learning & Behavior,20, 293–300.
Blough, P. M., &Lacourse, D. M. (1994). Sequential priming in visual search: Contributions of stimulus-driven facilitation and learned expectancies.Animal Learning & Behavior,22, 275–281.
Bond, A. B. (1982). The bead game: Response strategies in free assortment.Human Factors,24, 101–110.
Bond, A. B. (1983). Visual search and selection of natural stimuli in the pigeon: The attention threshold hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 292–306.
Bond, A. B., &Kamil, A. C. (1998). Apostatic selection by blue jays produces balanced polymorphism in virtual prey.Nature,395, 594–596.
Bond, A. B., &Riley, D. A. (1991). Searching image in the pigeon: A test of three hypothetical mechanisms.Ethology,87, 203–224.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
Broadbent, D. E. (1971).Decision and stress. New York: Academic Press.
Curio, H. (1976).The ethology of predation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Dawkins, M. (1971). Shifts of ‘attention’ in chicks during feeding.Animal Behaviour,19, 575–582.
Endler, J. A. (1991). Interactions between predators and prey. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.),Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 169–196). Oxford: Blackwell.
Gendron, R. P. (1986). Searching for cryptic prey: Evidence for optimal search rates and the formation of search images in quail.Animal Behaviour,34, 898–912.
Gendron, R. P., &Staddon, J. E. R. (1983). Searching for cryptic prey: The effect of search rate.American Naturalist,121, 172–186.
Guilford, T., &Dawkins, M. S. (1987). Search images not proven: A reappraisal of recent evidence.Animal Behaviour,35, 1838–1845.
Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kalbfleisch, J. D., &Prentice, R. L. (1980).The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley.
Kamil, A. C., Misthal, R. L., &Stephens, D. W. (1993). Failure of simple optimal foraging models to predict residence time when patch quality is uncertain.Behavioral Ecology,4, 350–363.
Keppel, G. (1982).Design and analysis (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kono, H., Reid, P. J., &Kamil, A. C. (1998). The effect of background cuing on prey detection.Animal Behaviour,56, 963–992.
Krebs, J. R. (1973). Behavioral aspects of predation. In P. P. G. Bateson & P. H. Klopfer (Eds.),Perspectives in ethology (pp. 73–111). New York: Plenum.
Lamb, M. R. (1988). Selective attention: Effects of cuing on the processing of different types of compound stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 96–104.
Langley, C. M. (1996). Search images: Selective attention to specific visual features of prey.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,22, 152–163.
Langley, C. M., Riley, D. A., Bond, A. B., &Goel, N. (1996). Visual search for natural grains in pigeons: Search images and selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,22, 139–151.
Lawrence, E. S. (1985). Evidence for search image in blackbirds (Turdus merula L.): Long-term learning.Animal Behaviour,33, 1301–1309.
Pietrewicz, A. T., &Kamil, A. C. (1977). Visual detection of cryptic prey by blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata).Science,195, 580–582.
Pietrewicz, A. T., &Kamil, A. C. (1979). Search image formation in the blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata).Science,204, 1332–1333.
Pietrewicz, A. T., &Kamil, A. C. (1981). Search images and the detection of cryptic prey: An operant approach. In A. C. Kamil & T. D. Sargent (Eds.),Foraging behavior: Ecological, ethological, and psychological approaches (pp. 311–331). New York: Garland.
Plaisted, K. [C.] (1997). The effect of interstimulus interval on the discrimination of cryptic targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,23, 248–259.
Plaisted, K. C., &Mackintosh, N. J. (1995). Visual search for cryptic stimuli in pigeons: Implications for the search image and search rate hypotheses.Animal Behaviour,50, 1219–1232.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V (pp. 669–682). San Diego: Academic Press.
Reid, P. J., &Shettleworth, S. J. (1992). Detection of cryptic prey: Search image or search rate?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 273–286.
Sargent, T. D. (1976). Legion of night: The underwing moths. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
SAS (1990).SAS/STAT user’s guide: Version 6 (4th ed., Vol. 2). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Sokal, R. R., &Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.
Tinbergen, L. (1960). The natural control of insects in pine woods: I. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds.Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie,13, 265–343.
Vreven, D., &Blough, P. M. (1998). Searching for one or many targets: Effects of extended experience on the runs advantage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,24, 98–105.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Our research was supported in part by NSF Grant IBN-9621044.
Images of moths and cryptic backgrounds, as well as the computer algorithms used in image generation, are available on our Web site (http://niko.unl.edu/~jaylab/ virtprey.htm).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bond, A.B., Kamil, A.C. Searching image in blue jays: Facilitation and interference in sequential priming. Animal Learning & Behavior 27, 461–471 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209981
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209981