Animal Learning & Behavior

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 476–482 | Cite as

Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement

  • George Ainslie
  • R. J. Herrnstein
Article

Abstract

Pigeons chose, in a two-key discrete-trial procedure, between 2- and 4-sec access to grain, with the larger amount always presented 4 sec later than the smaller. As the delay between the choice and the availability of the smaller reinforcement was varied from .01 to 12 sec, all subjects reversed preference from the small-early to the large-late reinforcement. The values of delay at which preference reversed were approximately consistent with the matching law as adapted for delayed reinforcement.

Reference Notes

  1. 1.
    Ainslie, G. W.Impulse and compulsion: A behavioral economic understanding of involuntary behavior. Unpublished manuscript, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ainslie, G. W.Correlates of peck-withholding on a discrete trial specious reward schedule. Unpublished manuscript, 1981.Google Scholar

References

  1. Ainslie, G. W. Impulse control in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,21, 485–489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainslie, G. Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.Psychological Bulletin, 1975,82, 463–496.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, W. M., &Rachlin, H. C. Choice as time allocation.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969,12, 861–874.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, R., &Herrnstein, R. J. Psychology. Boston: Little, Brown, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Chung, S.-H., &Herrnstein, R. J. Choice and delay of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967,10, 67–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Deluty, M. Z. Self-control and impulsiveness involving aversive events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1978,4, 250–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fantino, E. Immediate reward followed by extinction vs. later reward without extinction.Psychonomic Science, 1966,6, 233–234.Google Scholar
  8. Herrnstein, R. J. Self control as response strength. In C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, & C. F. Lowe (Eds.),Quantification of steady-state operant behaviour. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. Logan, R. A., &Spanier, D. Relative effect of delay of food and water reward.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,72, 102–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mazur, J. E., &Logue, A. W. Choice in a “self-control” paradigm: Effects of a fading procedure.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978,30, 11–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Navarick, D. J., &Fantino, E. Self-control and general models of choice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1976,2, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Prelec, D., &Herrnstein, R. J. Feedback functions for reinforcement: A paradigmatic experiment.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1978,6, 181–186.Google Scholar
  13. Rachlin, H. Introduction to modern behaviorism. San Francisco: Freeman, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. Rachlin, H., &Green, L. Commitment, choice and self-control.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972,17, 15–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Renner, K. E. Delay of reinforcement: A historical review.Psychological Bulletin, 1964,61, 341–361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Solnick, J. V., Kannenberg, C. H., Eckerman, D. A., &Waller, M. B. An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans.Learning and Motivation, 1980,11, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Strotz, R. H. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization.Review of Economic Studies, 1956,23, 166–180.Google Scholar
  18. Williams, B. A., &Fantino, E. Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978,29, 77–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Ainslie
    • 1
    • 3
  • R. J. Herrnstein
    • 2
  1. 1.Massachusetts Mental Health CenterBoston
  2. 2.Harvard UniversityCambridge
  3. 3.Veterans Administration HospitalCoatesville

Personalised recommendations