Abstract
With single-item visual displays, the facilitating effects of foreknowledge of item location have been demonstrated by using latency and accuracy as the dependent variables in detection tasks and by using latency as the dependent variable in recognition tasks. Evidence of such facilitat-ing effects obtained by using accuracy as the dependent variable in recognition tasks is scarce and rather ambiguous. One of the difficulties in demonstrating the beneficial effects of location cuing in recognition accuracy may be the fact that in these tasks a performance baseline of no cuing is used that leaves only relatively little room for improvement. Therefore, in the present experiments, we varied the performance baseline by presenting letters on one of three imaginary circles at different distances from the fixation point, and determined, for each subject, a presentation time that resulted in an overall no-cue accuracy rate of .75. In the experimental trials, three cue conditions were used: position cue (cuing 1 of 15 possible positions), ring cue (cuing 5 positions, all on one of the three circles), and no cue (cuing all 15 possible locations). In Experiment 1, the cue conditions were randomized. In Experiment 2, the cue conditions were blocked. Significant beneficial effects of foreknowledge of position were found in both experiments. Beneficial effects of ring cuing were found only in Experiment 2. In both experiments, the benefits of cuing are positively related to room for improvement. Partial correlations show that it is, indeed, room for improvement, and not the covarying factor of distance from fixation point, that determines cuing benefits. The theoretical implications of the beneficial effects of ring cuing under blocked presentation conditions are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bashinski, H. S., &Bacharach, V. R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 241–248.
EGLY, R., &HOMA, D. (1984). Sensitization of the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 778–793.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 201–204.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encodmg from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 155–160.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1974). Selective attention: Noise suppression or signal enhancement?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,4, 587–589.
Fleur, E, Lapre, L., Van Der Heijden, A. H. C, &Wolters, G. (1986).The effect of different numbers of cues and different masking patterns on letter recognition (Internal report, EP-86-02). Leiden, The Netherlands. University of Leiden.
Grind Ley, G. C, &Townsend, V. (1968). Voluntary attention in peripheral vision and its effects on acuity and differential thresholds.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 11–19.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The VHth Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. L Pick & I. J. Saltzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,109, 160–174.
Prinzmetal, W., Presti, D. E. &Posner, M. I. (1986). Does attention affect visual feature integration?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 361–369.
Tsal, Y. (1983) Movements of attention across the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 523–530.
Van Der Heijden, A. H. C. (1981).Short-term visual information forgetting. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Van Der Heijden, A. H. C, (1984). Postcategorical filtering in a barprobe task.Memory & Cognition,12, 446–457.
Van Der Heijden, A. H. C. (1987). Central selection in vision. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Perspectives on perception and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Van Der Heijden, A. H. C., &Eerland, E. (1973). The effects of cueing in a visual signal detection task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 496–503.
Van Der Heijden, A. H. C., Hagenaar, R., &Bloem, W. (1984). Two stages in postcategorical filtering and selection.Memory & Cognition,12, 458–469.
Van Der Heijden, A. H. C., Schreuder, R., &Wolters, G. (1985). Enhancing single-item recognition accuracy by cueing spatial locations in vision.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37a, 427–434.
Van Werkhoven, S., Wolters, G., &Van Der Heijden, A. H. C. (1986).The influence of masking on recognition of cued letters (Internal report, EP-86-01). Leiden, The Netherlands: University of Leiden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Der Heijden, A.H.C., Wolters, G., Groep, J.C. et al. Single-letter recognition accuracy benefits from advance cuing of location. Perception & Psychophysics 42, 503–509 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209758
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209758