Abstract
In these experiments we tested whether physical differences between letters and digits could account for the category effect in visual detection and partial report. In our task, observers decided whether a target item matched any item in a briefly presented array. This yielded a visual detection task when the target preceded the array and a type of partial-report task when the target followed the array. In Experiment 1, the stimulus set consisted of nine digits and nine letters modified to match the digits on the basis of visual similarity. Partial-report performance was better in a mixed-category condition than in a single-category condition, but no such effect occurred in visual detection. However, the similarity of items between categories may have biased observers against using category information to perform the task. When the similarity was controlled both within and between categories in Experiment 2, a category effect emerged in visual detection as well. A third experiment, using a same-different reaction time task, verified that the stimuli were equally similar within and between categories. The results indicate that physical differences alone cannot explain the category effect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cooper, L. A., &Podgorny, P. (1976). Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: Effects of complexity and similarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 503–514.
Corcoran, D. W. S., &Jackson, A. (1977). Basic processes and strategies in visual search. In S. Domic (Ed.),Attention and performance V (pp. 387–411). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Deutsch, J. A. (1977). On the category effect in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 590–592.
Di Lollo, V., &Moscovitch, M. (1983). Perceptual interference between spatially separate sequential displays.Canadian Journal of Psychology,37, 414–428.
Dixon, P. (1985). The category effect in visual detection and partial report.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 286–295.
Dixon, P. (1986). Attention and interference in the perception of brief visual displays.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 133–148.
Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli.Psychological Review,87, 272–300.
Duncan, J. (1983a). Category effects in visual search: A failure to replicate the “oh-zero” phenomenon.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 221–232.
Duncan, J. (1983b). Perceptual selection based on alphanumeric class: Evidence from partial reports.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 533–547.
Egeth, H., Jonides, J., &Wall, S. (1972). Parallel processing of multielement displays.Cognitive Psychology,3, 674–698.
Francolini, C. M., &Egeth, H. E. (1979). Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: The pop-out effect poops out.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 99–110.
Gardner, G. T. (1973) Evidence for independent parallel channels in tachistoscopic perception.Cognitive Psychology,4, 130–155.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Grier, J. B. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas.Psychological Bulletin,75, 424–429
Ingling, N. W. (1972) Categorization: A mechanism for rapid information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology,94, 239–243
Jonides, J., &Gleitman, H. (1972) A conceptual category effect in visual search’ O as letter or as digit.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 457–460.
Kahneman, D., &Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman, R. Davies, & J. Beatty (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). New York: Academic Press.
Krueger, L. E. (1984). The category effect in visual search depends on physical rather than conceptual differences.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 558–564.
Merikle, P. M. (1980). Selections from visual persistence by perceptual groups and category membership.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 279–295.
Pollack, I., &Norman, D. A. (1964). A nonparametric analysis of recognition experiments.Psychonomic Science,1, 125–126.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation.Psychological Monographs,74(11, Whole No. 498).
Taylor, D. A. (1978). Identification and categorization of letters and digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 423–439.
Townsend, V. M. (1973) Loss of spatial and identity information following a tachistoscopic exposure.Journal of Experimental Psychology,98, 113–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Grant A8263 to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dixon, P., Shedden, J.M. Conceptual and physical differences in the category effect. Perception & Psychophysics 42, 457–464 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209752
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209752