Abstract
Three experiments investigated the fact that the static visual features of an imprinting object (its color, size, and shape characteristics, as represented by the object remaining stationary during its presentation) can gradually acquire control over filial behavior by virtue of their repeated spatial-temporal pairing with visual motion—an effect that has been interpreted as a process of classical conditioning. Experiment 1 found that the static features can acquire control if they are made conspicuous in some other, nonmovement way (i.e., by manipulating the relative illumination of the imprinting object). Further experiments then failed to find any qualitative difference between the behavioral control developed by conspicuous but static aspects of a duckling’s environment and the control developed by the static features of a moving object, either in terms of persistence of the acquired control (Experiment 2) or in terms of possible restrictions imposed by the sensitive period for imprinting (Experiment 3). Taken together, these results support the plausibility of a perceptual learning hypothesis, although the classical conditioning view was not itself contradicted. The present findings are also relevant to the broader issue of whether any valid distinctions exist between the behavioral control exerted by static aspects of a precocial bird’s environment and the control exerted by animate, presumably social stimuli.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baron, A., &Kish, G. B. Early social isolation as a determinant of aggregative behavior in the domestic chicken.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1960,53, 459–463.
Bateson, P. P. Changes in chicks’ responses to novel moving objects over the sensitive period for imprinting.Animal Behaviour, 1964,12, 479–489. (a)
Bateson, P. P. Effect of similarity between rearing and testing conditions on chicks’ following and avoidance responses.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,57, 100–103. (b)
Bateson, P. P. Relation between conspicuousness of stimuli and their effectiveness in the imprinting situation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,58, 407–411. (c)
Bateson, P. P. The characteristics and context of imprinting.Biological Reviews, 1966,41, 177–220.
Boyd, H., &Fabricius, E. Observations on the incidence of following of visual and auditory stimuli in naive mallard ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos).Behaviour, 1965,25, 1–15.
Brown, R. T. Following and visual imprinting in ducklings across a wide age range.Developmental Psychobiology, 1975,8, 27–33.
Brown, R. T., &Hamilton, A. S. Imprinting: Effects of discrepancy from rearing conditions on approach to a familiar imprinting object in a novel situation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1977,91, 784–793.
Candland, D. K., Nagy, Z. M., &Conklyn, D. H. Emotional behavior in the domestic chicken (White Leghorn) as a function of age and developmental environment.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963,56, 1069–1073.
Eiserer, L. A. Behavioral control by stimulus components of an imprinting object.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1977,5, 153–160.
Eiserer, L. A. Anomalous effects in psychology: Parallels between the brain stimulation and imprinting literatures.Psychological Record, 1978,28, 557–570.
Eiserrer, L. A., &Hoffman, H. S. Priming of ducklings’ responses by presenting an imprinted stimulus.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,82, 345–359.
Eiserer, L. A., &Hoffman, H. S. Acquisition of behavioral control by the auditory features of an imprinting object.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1974,2, 275–277.
Eiserer, L. A., Hoffman, H. S., &Klein, S. H. Persistence of acquired behavioral control in the context of imprinting.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,24, 255–266.
Gaioni, S. J., Hoffman, H.S., DePaulo, P., &Stratton, V. N. Imprinting in older ducklings: Some tests of a reinforcement model.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1978,6, 19–26.
Garcia, J., Kimeldorf, D. J., &Koelling, R. A. A conditioned aversion towards saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation.Science, 1955,122, 157–158.
Graves, H. B. Early social responses inGallus: A functional analysis.Science, 1973,182, 937–939.
Gray, P. H. Evidence that retinal flicker is not a necessary condition of imprinting.Science, 1960,132, 1834–1835.
Hinde, R. A. The modifiability of instinctive behavior.Advancement of Science, London, 1955,12, 19–24.
Hoffman, H. S., Barrett, J., Ratner, A. M., &Singer, D. Conditioned suppression of distress calls in imprinted ducklings.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,80, 357–364.
Hoffman, H. S., &DePaulo, P. Behavioral control by an imprinting stimulus.American Scientist, 1977,65, 58–66.
Hoffman, H. S., Eiserer, L. A., &Singer, D. Acquisition of behavioral control by a stationary imprinting stimulus.Psychonomic Science, 1972,26, 146–148.
Hoffman, H. S., &Ratner, A. M. A reinforcement model of imprinting: Implications for socialization in monkeys and men.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 527–544. (a)
Hoffman, H. S., &Ratner, A. M. Effects of stimulus and environmental familiarity on visual imprinting in newly hatched ducklings.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,83, 11–19. (b)
Hoffman, H. S., Ratner, A. M., &Eiserer, L. A. Role of visual imprinting in the emergence of specific filial attachments in ducklings.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,81, 399–409.
Hoffman, H. S., Ratner, A. M., Eiserer, L. A., &Grossman, D. J. Aggressive behavior of immature ducklings.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974,86, 569–580.
Hoffman, H. S., Stratton, J. W., &Newby, V. The control of feeding behavior by an imprinted stimulus.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969,12, 847–860.
Hoffman, H. S., Stratton, J. W., Newby, V., &Barrett, J. E. Development of behavioral control by an imprinting stimulus.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,71, 229–236.
Jones, R. B. Open-field responses of domestic chicks in the presence or absence of familiar cues.Behavioral Processes, 1977,2, 315–323.
Malcom, S. M., &Graves, H. B. Responses ofGallus chicks to the static environment.Behavioral Biology, 1977,21, 251–266.
Pavlov, I. P. Conditioned reflexes. (G. V. Anrep, trans.) London: Oxford University Press, 1927.
Salzen, E. A. Imprinting and fear.Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 1962,8, 199–217.
Salzen, E. A. Imprinting and environmental learning. In L. R. Aronson, E. Tobach, D. S. Lehrman, & J. S. Rosenblatt (Eds.),Development and evolution of behavior. San Francisco: Freeman, 1970.
Salzen, E. A., Lily, R. E., &McKeown, J. R. Colour preference and imprinting in domestic chicks.Animal Behaviour, 1971,19, 542–547.
Sluckin, W., &Salzen, E. A. Imprinting and perceptual learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,13, 65–77.
Taylor, A., &Taylor, K. R. Imprinting to a static feature of the home environment.Nature, 1964,204, 1117–1118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Mellon Foundation.
This manuscript benefited greatly from the comments ofAnimal Learning & Behavior reviewers and editors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eiserer, L.A. Development of filial attachment to static visual features of an imprinting object. Animal Learning & Behavior 8, 159–166 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209744
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209744