Abstract
Four experiments compared runway extinction or hurdle-jumping from nonreward performance following brief (10 trials) continuous or partial reinforcement acquisition. Some of the partial groups received all nonrewarded trials prior to any rewards. The major findings were that (l) rats receiving all nonrewarded experiences prior to rewarded ones were more persistent during extinction than continuously rewarded subjects; (2) rats receiving nonrewarded placements prior to rewarded ones in one compartment of a two-compartment box, failed to learn a hurdle-jumping response to escape nonreward, whereas rats not receiving the initial nonrewards did learn the escape response; (3) increasing the number of rewarded placements following initial nonrewarded ones offset the effect noted in (2). The results, which are discussed in the context of a frustration analysis of the small-trials partial reinforcement effect, suggest that incentive growth over rewarded trials is retarded when the rewards have been preceded by nonrewards. The similarity of these results to those investigating the phenomenon of latent inhibition is apparent, and possible mechanisms responsible for the present results are suggested in current theoretical accounts of latent inhibition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amsel, A. The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations.Psychological Bulletin, 1958,55, 109–119.
Amsel, A., Wong, P. T., &Traupmann, K. L. Short-term and long-term factors in extinction and durable persistence.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,90, 90–95.
Brooks, C. I. Frustration to nonreward following limited reward experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81, 403–405.
Brooks, C. I. Frustration considerations of the small-trials partial reinforcement effect: Experience with nonreward and intertrial reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,89, 362–371.
Brooks, C. I. Primary frustration differences following brief partial reinforcement acquisition under varying magnitudes of reward.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1975,3, 67–72.
Capaldi, E. J. Partial reinforcement: A hypothesis of sequential effects.Psychological Review, 1966,73, 459–477.
Capaldi, E. J., &Waters, R. W. Conditioning and nonconditioning interpretations of small-trials phenomena.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,84, 518–522.
Collerain, I. Frustration odor of rats receiving small numbers of prior rewarded running trials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1978,4, 120–130.
Collerain, I., &Ludvigson, H. W. Aversion of conspecific odor or frustrative nonreward in rals.Psychonomic Science, 1972,27, 54–56.
Daly, H. B. Learning of a hurdle-jump response to escape cues paired with reduced reward or frustrative nonreward.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,79, 146–157.
Daly, H. B. Reinforcing properties of escape from frustration aroused in various learning situations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Dieter, S. E. Preexposure to situational cues and shock intensity in two-way avoidance learning.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1977,5, 403–406.
Feldman, M. A. The effects of preexposure to a warning or a safety signal on the acquisition of a two-way avoidance response in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1977,5, 21–24.
Lubow, R. E., Rifkin, B., &Alek, M. The context effect: The relationship between stimulus preexposure and environmental preexposure determines subsequent learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1976,2, 38–47.
Mackintosh, N. J. Stimulus selection: Learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. In R. A. Hinde & J. S. Hinde (Eds.),Constraints on learning. London: Academic-Press, 1973.
Mackintosh, N. J. The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press, 1974.
McAllister, D. E., McAllister, W. R., &Zellner, D. K. Preference for familiar stimuli in the rat.Psychological Reports, 1966,19, 868–870.
Spear, N. E., Hill, W. F., &O’Sullivan, D. J. Acquisition and extinction after initial trials without reward.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965,69, 25–29.
Spear, N. E., &Spitzner, J. H. Effect of initial nonrewarded trials: Factors responsible for increased resistance to extinction.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,74, 525–537.
Spence, K. W. Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956.
Theios, J., &Brelsford, J. Overlearning-extinction effect as an incentive phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,67, 463–467.
Wagner, A. R. Priming in STM: An information processing mechanism for self-generated or retrieval-generated depression in performance. In T. J. Tighe & R. N. Leaton (Eds.),Habituation: Perspectives from child development, animal behavior and neurophysiology. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brooks, C.I. Effect of prior nonreward on subsequent incentive growth during brief acquisition. Animal Learning & Behavior 8, 143–151 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209742
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209742