Abstract
Four pairs of rats were studied in a yoked control design intended to determine if an interim activity (schedule-induced drinking) was sensitive to operant contingencies. Food was always presented on a fixed-time 30-sec schedule. Additionally, a positive or negative operant contingency was in effect during the first 6 sec of each interval. The positive (drink/food) contingency produced an extra food presentation at the 6th second of an interval if the lead rat drank at least once in the first 6 sec. The negative (no-drink/food) contingency produced an extra food presentation only if the lead rat did not drink in the first 6 sec. Two pairs of rats were first exposed to the positive contingency and then to the negative contingency. Two pairs received training in the reverse order. In drink/food training, all lead rats developed patterns of drinking that produced extra food presentations in most intervals. There were some indications that the positive contingency facilitated early acquisition of drinking, but the yoked rats eventually developed temporal distributions and asymptotic levels of drinking comparable to those that occurred in lead rats. In no-drink/food training, the two lead rats initially exposed to the positive contingency showed high levels of drinking inappropriate to the negative contingency, but the two lead rats initially exposed to the negative contingency showed appropriately low levels of drinking. The latter effects seem attributable to the no-drink/food contingency.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Falk, J. L. Conditions producing psychogenic polydipsia in animals.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1969,157, 569–593.
Falk, J. L. The origin and functions of adjunctive behavior.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1977,5, 325–355.
Flory, R. K. The control of schedule-induced polydipsia: Frequency and magnitude of reinforcement.Learning and Motivation, 1971,2, 215–227.
Flory, R. K., &Lickfett, G. G. Effect of lick-contingent timeout on schedule-induced polydipsia.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,21, 45–55.
Innis, N. K. Reinforcement as input: Temporal tracking on cyclic-interval schedules. In M. Commons & J. A. Nevin (Eds.),Quantitative studies of operant behavior: Discriminative properties of reinforcement schedules. New York: Pergamon Press, in press.
Millenson, J. R., Allen, R. B., &Pinker, S. Adjunctive drinking during variable and random-interval food reinforcement schedules.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1977,5, 285–290.
Moran, G., & Rudolph, R. L. Operant processes in the development of schedule-induced polydipsia.Learning and Motivation, in press.
Reberg, D., Innis, N. K., Mann, B., &Eizenga, C. “Superstitious” behaviour resulting from periodic response-independent presentations of food or water.Animal Behaviour, 1978,26, 506–519.
Reberg, D., Mann, B., &Innis, N. K. Superstitious behaviour for food and water in the rat.Physiology & Behavior, 1977,19, 803–806.
Segal, E. F., &Oden, D. L. Schedule-induced polydipsia: Effects of providing an alternate reinforced response and of introducing a lick-contingent delay in food delivery.Psychonomic Science, 1969,15, 153–154.
Staddon, J. E. R. Schedule-induced behavior. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.),Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
Staddon, J. E. R., &Ayres, S. L. Sequential and temporal properties of behavior induced by a schedule of periodic food delivery.Behaviour, 1975,54, 26–49.
Staddon, J. E. R., &Frank, J. A. The role of the peck-food contingency on fixed-interval schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,23, 17–23.
Staddon, J. E. R., &Simmelhag, V. L. The “superstition” experiment: A re-examination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior.Psychological Review, 1971,78, 3–43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Research and manuscript preparation supported by a grant from the National Research Council of Canada to D. Reberg.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reberg, D. Reinforcing the occurrence or nonoccurrence of interim drinking. Animal Learning & Behavior 8, 120–128 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209739
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209739