Abstract
EightCebus albifrons monkeys received 25 sessions of discriminative operant conditioning of the skin conductance response (SCR), with colored lights as discriminative stimuli and with Sidman avoidance (SS-40 sec, RS-40 sec) scheduled during one light and response-contingent shock during the other, Discriminative stimulus segments were separated by 30-sec periods of time-out from shocks and lights, Two extinction sessions were run 3 months after training, Almost from the beginning of conditioning, the monkeys made significantly more unelicited skin conductance responses in the avoidance periods than in punishment, The monkeys’ heart rates also increased significantly, but there was no difference between avoidance and punishment, SCR frequency during extinction continued to differentiate significantly between avoidance and punishment, and there was a significant increase in this differentiation from the last conditioning session to the first extinction session, but the difference then reduced in the second session, The results indicated that monkey’s SCRs are influenced by instrumental reinforcement contingencies somewhat in the same fashion as those of humans.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Greene, W. A., &Sutor, L. T. Stimulus control of skin resistance responses on an escape-avoidance schedule.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971,16, 269–274.
Kimmel, H. D. Instrumental conditioning of autonomically mediated responses in human beings.American Psychologist, 1974,29, 325–335.
Kimmel, H. D., &Burns, R. A. Inter-effector influences in operant autonomic control, In J. Beatty & H. Legewie (Eds.),Biofeedback and behavior. New York: Plenum, 1977.
Kimmel, H. D., &Kimmel, E. Inter-effector influences in operant autonomic conditioning.Psychonomic Science, 1967,9, 191–192.
Miller, N. E., &Banuazizi, A. Instrumental learning by curarized rats of a specific visceral response, intestinal or cardiac,Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,65, 1–7.
Shapiro, D., Tursky, B., &Crider, A. Differentiation of an autonomic response through operant reinforcement,Psychonomic Science, 1964,1, 147–148.
Venables, P. H., &Christie, M. J. Mechanisms, instrumentation, recording techniques, and quantification of response. In W. F. Prokasy & D. G. Raskin (Eds.),Electrodermat activity in psychological research, New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was funded by Contract No, 17-76-6053, U. S. Army Medical Research and Development Command.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kimmel, H.D., Brennan, A.F., McLeod, D.C. et al. Instrumental electrodermal conditioning in the monkey (Cebus albifrons): Acquisition and long-term retention. Animal Learning & Behavior 7, 447–451 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209699
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209699