Abstract
Undeprived hamsters received nest paper or sunflower seeds in their home cages, free or contingent on one of three activities. The pattern of effects of reinforcement was the same as that reported previously with food for hungry hamsters in an open field: Open rearing and scrabbling quickly increased in rate when reinforced with paper or seeds, but face washing showed little or no increase. Certain interrelations found previously between noncontingent effects of reinforcers, deprivation effects, and contingent effects were absent and therefore are not essential to the differences among these three behaviors during reinforcement. The hamsters could learn to interrupt fact washing to collect either paper or seeds, but even then they did not increase their time face washing to high levels. Raising the operant level of face washing by spraying the animals with water did not improve instrumental performance. Face washing could be classified as an involuntary activity, but this term does not provide a full account of its special properties, such as shortened bouts, during reinforcement and punishment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Black, A. H., &Young, G. A. Constraints on the operant conditioning of drinking. In R. M. Gilbert & J. R. Millenson (Eds.),Reinforcement: Behavioral analyses. New York: Academic Press, 1972. Pp. 35–50.
Bolles, R. C. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 32–48.
Hearst, E. The classical-instrumental distinction: Reflexes, voluntary behavior, and categories of association learning. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Hogan, J. A., &Roper, T. J. A comparison of the properties of different reinforcers.Advances in the Study of Behavior, 1978,8, 155–255.
Jansen, P. E., Goodman, E. D., Jowaisas, D., &Bunnell, B. N. Paper as a positive reinforcer for acquisition of a bar press response by the golden hamster.Psychonomic Science, 1969,16, 113–114.
Konorski, J. Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Richelle, M., Charpentier, C, Cornil, E., Bronckart, J. P., &Lalière, C. L’amassement comme motivation dans le conditionnement du hamster.Psychologie Belgique, 19677, 67–74.
Roper, T. J. Paper as a reinforcer for fixed-ratio responding in mice.Learning and Motivation, 1975,6, 327–343.
Seligman, M. E. P. On the generality of the laws of learning.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 406–418.
Shettleworth, S. J. Constraints on learning.Advances in the Study of Behavior, 1972,4, 1–68.
Shettleworth, S. J. Food reinforcement and the organization of behavior in golden hamsters. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.),Constraints on learning: Limitations and predispositions. London: Academic Press, 1973, Pp. 243–263.
Shettleworth, S. J. Reinforcement and the organization of behavior in golden hamsters. Hunger, environment, and food reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes, 1975,1, 56–87.
Shettleworth, S. J. Reinforcement and the organization of behavior in golden hamsters: Punishment of three action patterns.Learning and Motivation, 1978,9, 99–123.
Shettleworth, S. J. Constraints on conditioning in the writings of Konorski. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.),Mechanisms of learning and motivation. Proceedings of a Memorial Conference for Jerzy Konorski. Hillsdale, N.J. Erlbaum, in press.
Stevenson-Hinde, I. Constraints on reinforcement. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.),Constraints on learning Limitations and predispositions. London: Academic Press, 1973. Pp. 285–296.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants to the author from the National Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shettleworth, S.J. Reinforcement and the organization of behavior in golden hamsters: Sunflower seed and nest paper reinforcers. Animal Learning & Behavior 6, 352–362 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209626
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209626