Abstract
Multiple schedules established stimulus-reinforcer (S-SR) associations on baselines in which equal response rates and patterning were maintained in all components. Subsequently, stimuli associated with an increase in reinforcement but no change in ongoing response rate were compounded. For one experimental group, free-operant avoidance (FOA) was programmed in tone and in light while variable-interval (VI) food reinforcement was effective in their simultaneous absence (T + L). The opposite stimulus-schedule combinations were programmed for the other. Both groups remained in their VI components 85% of the session on schedule preference tests, and on a stimulus compounding test emitted approximately 1.5 times as many responses to tone-plus-light (T + L) as to tone or light alone. This is the first report of additive summation to combined discriminative stimuli associated with only an increase in reinforcement. Nondifferentially trained controls who had the same contingency effective in tone, light, and T + L-VI or FOA—showed neither preference among schedule components or summation during stimulus compounding, indicating that nonassociative stimulus factors made no contribution to either resultant in the experimental animals. Evidence supporting an algebraic combination of response and reinforcement associations is presented, and functional similarities between transfer-of-control studies and the stimulus compounding tests of the experimental groups in the present experiment are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Autor, S. M.The strength of conditioned reinforcers as a function of frequency and probability of reinforcement. In D. P. Hendry (Ed.),Conditioned reinforcement. Homewood: Dorsey Press, 1969. Pp. 127–162.
Bull, I. A., &Overmier, J. B. Additive and subtractive properties of excitation and inhibition.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 511–514.
Emurian, H. H., &Weiss, S. J. Compounding discriminative stimuli controlling free-operant avoidance.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972,17, 249–256.
Logan, F. A., &Wagner, A. R. Reward and punishment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1965.
Miller, L., &Ackley, R. Summation of responding maintained by fixed-interval schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970,13, 199–203.
Mowrer, O. H. On the dual nature of learning—A re-interpretation of “conditioning” and “problem solving.”Harvard Educational Review, 1947,17, 102–148.
Overmier, I. B., &Schwarzkopf, K. H. Summation of food and shock based responding.Learning and Motivation, 1974,5, 42–52.
Rescorla, R. A. Informational variables in Pavlovian conditioning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Rescorla, R. A., &LoLordo, V. M. Pavlovian inhibition of avoidance behavior.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965,59, 406–412.
Rescorla, R. A., &Solomon, R. L. Two-process learning theory: Relationship between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 151–182.
Schlosberg, H. The relationship between success and the laws of conditioning.Psychological Review, 1937,44, 379–394.
Trapold, M. A., &Overmier, J. B. The second learning process in instrumental learning. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II. Current theory and research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972. Pp. 427–451.
Weiner, B. I. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
Weisman, R. G., &Litner, J. S. Positive conditioned reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,68, 597–603.
Weiss, S. J. Summation of response strengths instrumentally conditioned to stimuli in different sensory modalities.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,68, 151–155.
Weiss, S. J. An effective and economical sound attenuation chamber.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970,13, 37–39.
Weiss, S. J. Discrimination training and stimulus compounding: Consideration of nonreinforcement and response differentiation consequences of SΔ.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971,15, 387–402.
Weiss, S. J. Multiple schedule control of free-operant avoidance: The contribution of response rate and incentive relations between schedule components.Learning and Motivation, 1976,7, 477–516.
Weiss, S. J., &Van Ost, S. L. Response discriminative and reinforcement factors in stimulus control of performance on multiple and chained schedules of reinforcement.Learning and Motivation, 1974,5, 459–472.
Wolf, M. M. Some effects of combined SΔs.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963,6, 343–347.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH-16853 from the National Institute of Mental Health, United States Public Health Service. It was presented at the 1975 convention of the Psychonomic Society in Denver, Colorado.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiss, S.J. The isolation of stimulus-reinforcer associations established with multiple schedules. Animal Learning & Behavior 5, 421–429 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209590
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209590