Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
  3. Article

A better stopping rule for conventional statistical tests

  • Published: December 1998
  • Volume 30, pages 690–697, (1998)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript
A better stopping rule for conventional statistical tests
Download PDF
  • Robert W. Frick1 
  • 1883 Accesses

  • 44 Citations

  • 12 Altmetric

  • 1 Mention

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

The goal of some research studies is to demonstrate the existence of an effect. Statistical testing, withp less than .05, is one criterion for establishing the existence of this effect. In this situation, the fixedsample stopping rule, in which the number of subjects is determined in advance, is impractical and inefficient. This article presents a sequential stopping rule that is practical and about 30% more efficient: Once a minimum number of subjects is tested, stop withp less than .01 or greater than .36; otherwise, keep testing. This procedure keeps alpha at .05 and can be adjusted to fit researchers’ needs and inclinations.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Variable criteria sequential stopping rule: Validity and power with repeated measures ANOVA, multiple correlation, MANOVA and relation to Chi-square distribution

Article 21 September 2017

Stopping rules as experimental design

Article 22 March 2019

Absolute precision confidence intervals for unstandardized mean differences using sequential stopping rules

Article 29 June 2022
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Arghami, N. R., &Billard, L. (1982). A modification of a truncated partial sequential procedure.Biometrika,69, 613–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arghami, N. R., &Billard, L. (1991). A partial sequentialt-test.Sequential Analysis,10, 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P. (1957). Restricted sequential procedures.Biometrika,44, 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billard, L., &Vagholkar, M. K. (1969). A sequential procedure for testing a null hypothesis against a two-sided alternative hypothesis.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B,31, 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boneau, C. A. (1960). The effects of violations of assumptions underlying thet test.Psychological Bulletin,57, 49–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeMets, D. L., &Lan, K. K. G. (1984). An overview of sequential methods and their application in clinical trials.Communications in Statistics: Theory & Methods,13, 2315–2338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doll, R. (1982). Clinical trials: Retrospect and prospect.Statistics in Medicine,1, 337–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., Lindman, H., &Savage, L. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research.Psychological Review,70, 193–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiting, M. H. (1991). Sequential reliability tests.Applied Psychological Measurement,15, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, D. W., &Jones, L. V. (1954). Sequential analysis in psychological research.Psychological Bulletin,51, 264–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, R. W. (1995). Accepting the null hypothesis.Memory & Cognition,23, 132–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, R. W. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing.Psychological Methods,1, 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S. N., &Royall, R. (1988). Evidence and scientific research.American Journal of Public Health,78, 1568–1574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haybittle, J. L. (1971). Repeated assessment of results in clinical trials of cancer treatment.British Journal of Radiology,44, 793–797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, H. S. (1992). An application of sequential analysis to observerbased psychophysics.Infant Behavior & Development,15, 271–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, I. K. (1992). Overview of the development of sequential procedures. In K. E. Bruce (Ed.),Biopharmaceutical sequential statistical application (pp. 3–18). New York: Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennison, C., &Turnbull, B. W. (1991). Group sequential tests and repeated confidence intervals. In M. Ghosh & P. K. Sen (Eds.),Handbook of sequential analysis (pp. 283–311). New York: Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, K. K. G., DeMets, D. L., &Halperin, M. (1984). More flexible sequential and non-sequential designs in long-term clinical trials.Communication in Statistics: Theory & Methods,13, 2339–2353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, K. K. G., Simon, R., &Halperin, M. (1982). Stochastically curtailed tests in long-term clinical trials.Communication in Statistics: Sequential Analysis,1, 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. L., Rock, D. A., &Cleary, T. A. (1969). The development and evaluation of several programmed testing methods.Educational & Psychological Measurement,29, 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. L., Rock, D. A., &Cleary, T. A. (1972). Sequential testing for dichotomous decisions.Educational & Psychological Measurement,32, 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J. (1950).First course in probability and statistics. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, P. C., &Fleming, T. R. (1979). A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials.Biometrics,35, 549–556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (1992). An approximation method for the characteristics of the sequential probability ratio test.Sequential Analysis,11, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peto, R., Pike, P., Armitage, P., Breslow, N. E., Cox, D. R., Howard, S. V., Mantel, N., McPherson, K., Peto, J., &Smith, P. G. (1976). Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient.British Journal of Cancer,35, 585–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, S. J. (1977). Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials.Biometrika,64, 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, S. J. (1992). When to stop a clinical trial.British Medical Journal,305, 235–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proschan, M. A., Follmann, D. A., &Waclawiw, M. A. (1992). Effects of assumption violations on Type I error rate in group sequential monitoring.Biometrics,48, 1131–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegmund, D. (1985).Sequential analysis: Tests and confidence intervals. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slud, E., &Wei, L. J. (1982). Two sample repeated significance tests based on the modified Wilcoxon statistic.Journal of the American Statistical Association,77, 862–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M., &Wald, A. (1949). A sequential decision procedure for choosing one of three hypotheses concerning the unknown mean of a normal distribution.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,20, 502–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, T. D., Rosenbaum, W. L., &Weinkam, J. J. (1995). Publication decisions revisited: The effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice versa.American Statistician,49, 108–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, W. (1947).Sequential analysis. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. (1953). Testing one simple hypothesis against another.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,24, 273–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J., &Brunier, H. (1990). The double triangular test: A sequential test for the two-sided alternative with early stopping under the null hypothesis.Sequential Analysis,9, 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, SUNY at Stony Brook, 11794-2500, Stony Brook, NY

    Robert W. Frick

Authors
  1. Robert W. Frick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Frick.

Additional information

I thank Ira Bernstein, Peter Dixon, Arthur Samuel, and anonymous reviewers for their suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frick, R.W. A better stopping rule for conventional statistical tests. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 30, 690–697 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209488

Download citation

  • Received: 15 January 1997

  • Accepted: 16 July 1997

  • Issue Date: December 1998

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209488

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Null Hypothesis
  • Monte Carlo Simulation
  • Sequential Probability Ratio Test
  • High Criterion
  • Multiple Statistical Test
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

5.135.140.155

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature