Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
  3. Article

The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes

  • Application Of ERP Measures In Psychological Research
  • Published: March 1998
  • Volume 30, pages 146–156, (1998)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript
The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes
Download PDF
  • Martin Eimer1 
  • 3832 Accesses

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

The lateralized readiness potential (LRP) is an electrophysiological indicator of the central activation of motor responses. Procedures for deriving the LRP on the basis of event-related brain potential (ERP) waveforms obtained over the left and right motor cortices are described, and some findings are summarized that show that the LRP is likely to reflect activation processes within the motor cortex. Two experiments investigating spatial S-R compatibility effects are reported that demonstrate that, because of systematic overlaps of motor and nonmotor asymmetries, LRP waveforms derived by the double subtraction method cannot always be interpreted unequivocally in terms of response activation. Such confounds can be detected when LRP waveforms are compared with difference waveforms obtained by the double subtraction method from ERPs elicited at other lateral scalp sites.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Eriksen’s two-phase model of spatial selective attention: Physiological evidence of trial-mixing-dependent response inhibition

Article 18 October 2020

The neurocognitive underpinnings of the Simon effect: An integrative review of current research

Article 07 October 2020

Dissociating the Influence of Affective Word Content and Cognitive Processing Demands on the Late Positive Potential

Article 27 May 2015
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Arezzo, J., &Vaughan, H. G. (1975). Cortical potentials associated with voluntary movements in the monkey.Brain Research,88, 99–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Böcker, K. B. E., Brunia, C. H. M., &Cluitmans, P. J. M. (1994). A spatio-temporal dipole model of the readiness potential in humans: II. Foot movement.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,91, 286–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunia, C. H. M. (1980). What is wrong with the legs in motor preparation?Progress in Brain Research,54, 232–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition.Psychophysiology,26, 251–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., &Fabiani, M. (1990). Event-related potentials. In J. T. Cacioppo & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.),Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements (pp. 413–455). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., Logan, G. D., &Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 164–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., &Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response compatibility.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 731–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., &Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 682–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M. (1993). Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: An ERP study on visuo-spatial orienting.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,88, 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 837–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,99, 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M., Goschke, T., Schlaghecken, F., &Stürmer, B. (1996). Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M., Hommel, B., &Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection.Acta Psychologica,90, 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evdokimidis, I., Mergner, T., &Lücking, C. H. (1992). Dependence of presaccadic cortical potentials on the type of saccadic eye movement.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,83, 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, W. J., Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., &Donchin, E. (1992). Probability effects on stimulus evaluation and response processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 198–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemba, H., &Sasaki, K. (1990). Potential related to no-go reaction in go/no-go hand movements with discrimination between tone stimuli of different frequencies in the monkey.Brain Research,537, 340–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., &Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, G., Kramer, A. F., Coles, M. G. H., &Donchin, E. (1989). Simulation studies of latency measures of components of event-related brain potential.Psychophysiology,26, 233–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, T. C., Wijers, A. A., Jackson, J. L., &Mulder, G. (1994). Visual spatial attention to stimuli presented on the vertical meridian: An ERP study.Psychophysiology,31, 140–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasbroucq, T., &Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 246–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, A., Lüders, H. O., Burgess, R. C., &Shibasaki, H. (1992). Movement-related potentials recorded from supplementary motor area and primary motor area.Brain,115, 1017–1043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,10, 371–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., &Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy.Psychological Review,97, 253–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kornhuber, H. H., &Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale.Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie,248, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., &Donchin, E. (1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials.Brain Research,202, 95–115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., &Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J., &Hillyard, S. A. (1994a). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search.Psychophysiology,31, 291–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J., &Hillyard, S. A. (1994b). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1000–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., &Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.,Patterson, T., &Ulrich, R. (in press). A jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences.Psychophysiology.

  • Miller, J., &Ulrich, R. (in press). Locus of the effect of the number of alternatives: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.

  • Okada, Y. C., Williamson, S. J., &Kaufman, L. (1982). Magnetic fields of the human sensorimotor cortex.International Journal of Neurophysiology,17, 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., &Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, A., &Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1292–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1978).Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Requin, J. (1985). Looking forward to moving soon: Ante factum selective processes in motor control. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and Performance XI (pp. 147–167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Requin, J., &Riehle, A. (1995). Neural correlates of partial transmission of sensorimotor information in the cerebral cortex.Acta Psychologica,90, 81–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbaugh, J. W., &Gaillard, A. W. K. (1983). Sensory and motor aspects of the contingent negative variation. In A. W. K. Gaillard & W. Ritter (Eds.),Tutorials in ERP research: Endogenous components (pp. 269–310). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenau, P., Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., &Hohnsbein, J. (1998). A new method for the estimation of the onset of the lateralized readiness potential (LRP).Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,30, 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 174–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smulders, F. T. Y., Kenemans, J. L., &Kok, A. (1996). Effects of task variables on measures of the mean onset latency of LRP depend on the scoring method.Psychophysiology,33, 194–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smulders, F. T. Y., Kok, A., Kenemans, J. L., &Bashore, T. R. (1995). The temporal selectivity of additive factor effects on the reaction process revealed in ERP component latencies.Acta Psychologica,90, 97–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., &Ulrich, R. (1994). The lateralized readiness potential preceding brief isometric force pulses of different peak force and rate of force production.Psychophysiology,31, 503–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Syndulko, K., &Lindsley, D. B. (1977). Motor and sensory determinants of cortical slow potential shifts in man. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.),Attention, voluntary contraction and event-related cerebral potentials (pp. 97–131). Basel: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle-Inclán, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study.Biological Psychology,43, 147–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Boxtel, G. J. M. (1994).Non-motor components of slow brain potentials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Boxtel, G. J. M. (1998). Computational and statistical methods for analyzing event-related potential data.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,30, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, H., Costa, L. D., &Ritter, W. (1968). Topography of the human motor potential.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,25, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.Journal of Experimental Psychology,88, 354–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., &Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain.Nature,203, 380–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wascher, E., &Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). The interaction of stimulusand response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,99, 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wauschkuhn, B., Wascher, E., &Verleger, R. (1997). Lateralized cortical activity due to the preparation of saccades and finger movements: A comparative study.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,102, 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, S., Tsuchiya, H., &Kobayashi, S. (1994). Electroencephalographic activity associated with shifts of visuospatial attention.Brain,117, 553–562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing St., CB2 3EB, Cambridge, UK

    Martin Eimer

Authors
  1. Martin Eimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Eimer.

Additional information

The present research was supported by the Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research and by Grant Ei 266/4-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The author thanks Erich Schröger (who served as action editor for this article), Werner Sommer, and Rolf Verleger for valuable comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eimer, M. The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 30, 146–156 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209424

Download citation

  • Issue Date: March 1998

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209424

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Motor Cortex
  • Simon Effect
  • Lateralized Readiness Potential
  • Incompatible Trial
  • Compatible Trial
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

65.109.116.201

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature