Abstract
In this study, we attempted to determine why the mnemonic benefit of bizarreness is not found with the use of complex sentences (i.e., those containing additional modifiers of nouns) as stimuli. Several explanations were investigated, including the idea that complexity reduces the imageability of the sentence and the idea that complexity itself is mnemonically beneficial. The results of four experiments favored the latter explanation. We suggest that the cues associated with the complexity of the sentence provide more effective or salient retrieval cues than do those associated with sentence bizarreness. Consequently, the mnemonic benefit of bizarreness appears to occur only with relatively impoverished encoding contexts (e.g., simple, unelaborated sentences).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Beech, J. R., & Allport, D. A. (1978). Visualization of compound scenes.Perception,7, 129–138.
Bower, G. H. (1970). Imagery as a relational organizer in associative learning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 529–533.
Collyer, S. C., Jonides, J., & Bevan, W. (1972). Images as memory aids: Is bizarreness helpful?American Journal of Psychology,85, 31–38.
Cornoldi, C., Cavedon, A., de Beni, R., & Pra Baldi, A. (1988). The influence of the nature of material and of mental operations on the occurrence of the bizarreness effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 73–85.
Cox, S. D., & Wollen, K. A. (1981). Bizarreness and recall.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,18, 244–245.
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,55, 467–517.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1987). Distinctiveness and the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.),Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 78–102). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., & Lackey, S. (1989). Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 137–146.
Hirshman, E., Whelley, M. M., & Palij, M. (1989). An investigation of paradoxical memory effects.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 594–609.
Hubbard, T. L., & Stoeckig, K. (1988). Musical imagery: Generation of tones and chords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 656–667.
Kline, S., & Groninger, L. D. (1991). The imagery bizarreness effect as a function of sentence complexity and presentation time.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,29, 25–27.
Kosslyn, S. M., Cave, C. B., Provost, D. A., & von Gierke, S. M. (1988). Sequential processes in image generation.Cognitive Psychology,20, 319–343.
Kosslyn, S. M., Reiser, B. J., Farah, M. A., & Fliegel, S. L. (1983). Generating visual images: Units and relations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 278–303.
Kroll, N., Schepeler, E. M., & Angin, K. T. (1986). Bizarre imagery: The misremembered mnemonic.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 42–54.
Kroll, N., & Tu, S. F. (1988). The bizarre mnemonic.Psychological Research,50, 28–37.
Lorayne, H., & Lucas, J. (1974).The memory book. New York: Stein & Day.
Marshall, P. H., Nau, K., & Chandler, C. K. (1980). A functional analysis of common and bizarre visual mediators.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,15, 375–377.
McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, D. C., Einstein, G. O., & O’Halloran, C. M. (1989). Modulation of environmental reinstatement effects through encoding strategies.American Journal of Psychology,102, 523–548.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1986). Bizarre imagery as an effective memory aid: The importance of distinctiveness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 54–65.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1989). Sentence complexity eliminates the mnemonic advantage of bizarre imagery.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 117–120.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1991). Bizarre imagery: Mnemonic benefits and theoretical implications. In R. H. Logie & M. Denis (Eds.),Mental images in human cognition (pp. 183–192). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
O’Brien, E. J., & Wolford, C. R. (1982). Effect of delay in testing on retention of plausible versus bizarre mental images.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 148–152.
Paivio, A., & Harshman, R. (1983). Factor analysis of a questionnaire on imagery and verbal habits and skills.Canadian Journal of Psychology,37, 461–483.
Pra Baldi, A., de Beni, R., Cornoldi, C., & Cavedon, A. (1985). Some conditions for the occurrence of the bizarreness effect in free recall.British Journal of Psychology,76, 427–436.
Richman, C. L., Dunn, J., Kahl, G., Sadler, L., & Simmons, K. (1990). The bizarre sentence effect as a function of list length and complexity.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,28, 185–187.
Smith, S. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In G.M. Davies & D. M. Thomson (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–34). Wiley.
Stein, B. S., & Bransford, J. D. (1979). Constraints on effective elaboration: Effects of precision and subject generation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 769–777.
Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,104, 442–452.
Wollen, K. A., & Cox, S. D. (1981a). The bizarreness effect in a multitrial intentional learning task.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,18, 296–298.
Wollen, K. A., & Cox, S. D. (1981b). Sentence cuing and the effectiveness of bizarre imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,104, 442–452.
Wollen, K. A., & Magres, M. G. (1987). Bizarreness and the imagery multiprocess model. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.),Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 103–128). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Yates, F. A. (1966).The art of memory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robinson-Riegler, B., MCDaniel, M.A. Further constraints on the bizarreness effect: Elaboration at encoding Bridget Robinson-Riegler. Memory & Cognition 22, 702–712 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209255
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209255