Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Animal Learning & Behavior
  3. Article
The free food (contrafreeloading) phenomenon: A review and analysis
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Published: September 1977

The free food (contrafreeloading) phenomenon: A review and analysis

  • Steve R. Osborne1 

Animal Learning & Behavior volume 5, pages 221–235 (1977)Cite this article

  • 3735 Accesses

  • 174 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Animals will perform an operant response to obtain food when abundant free food is available. These data have implications for current learning theories, especially in terms of the motivational variables associated with such behavior. The present paper reviews the literature and provides an analysis that suggests that responding for food in the presence of free food is importantly controlled by stimulus change attendant upon response-dependent food presentation. This apparent stimulus-reinforcer effect on behavior is compared to that observed in other areas of animal learning research that include preference between schedules of response-dependent and response-independent reinforcement, preference between schedules of signaled and unsignaled reinforcement, autoshaping and automaintenance, and self-reinforcement in animals.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Reference Note

  1. Knopp, J., & Bourland, G.Rats barpress for food in the presence of free food under a variety of free food conditions. Paper presented at Western Psychological Association. April 1972.

References

  • Alferink, L. A., Crossman, E. K., &Cheney, C. D. Control of responding by a conditioned rein forcer in the presence of free food.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, J. B. Aversive aspects of a schedule of positive reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963,6, 423–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atnip, G., &Hothersall, D. The preference of albino rats for free or response-produced food.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973,2, 153–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baenninger, R., &Mattleman, R. A. Visual reinforcement: Operant acquisition in the presence of a free mirror.Animal Learnings Behavior, 1973,1, 302–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, G. W., &Baron, A. Stimulus complexity and sensory reinforcement.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1961,54, 466–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S. A. The rat: A study in behavior. Chicago: Aldine, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilbrey, J. L., Patterson, D. D., &Winokur, S. Maintenance and autoshaping of keypecking in undeprived pigeons.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973,2, 394–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindra, D. A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior modification.Psychological Review, 1974,81, 199–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R., Honig, W. K. Surprise value of food determines its effectiveness as a reinforcer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1976,2, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolles, R. C. Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 394–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. L., &Jenkins, H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon’s key peck.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, M. B. Signalled reinforcing brain stimulation facilitates operant behavior under schedules of intermittent reinforcement.Science, 1971,174, 610–612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, M. B., &LoLordo, V. M. Rats prefer signalled reinforcing brain stimulation to unsignalled ESB.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,71, 183–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, M. B., &LoLordo, V. M. Reward value of brain stimulation is inversely related to uncertainty about its onset.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,79, 259–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carder, B. Rats’ preference for earned in comparison with free liquid reinforcers.Psychonomic Science, 1972,26, 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carder, B., &Beckman, G. C. Limitations of “container neophobia” as an explanation of rats’ responding for food in the presence of free food.Behavioral Biology, 1975,14, 109–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carder, B., &Berkowitz, K. Rats preference for earned in comparison with free food.Science, 1970,167, 1273–1274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, C. N., &Riccio, D. C. Experience with the reinforcer and the preference for earned rather than free reinforcers in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1976,4, 269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, J. F., &Tarte, R. D. The effects of rearing environments on the contrafreeloading phenomenon in rats.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1976,26, 289–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Salmon, C., &Blancheteau, M. Transport et consommation de la norriture dans un parcour expérimental chez le rat blanc.L’Année Psychologique, 1967,67, 377–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, G., &Jennings, J. W. Work as a determinant of instrumental performance.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,68, 659–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato, M. R. Derived motives,Annual Review of Psychology, 1974,25, 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. Factors affecting keypress responding by rats in the presence of free food.Psychonomic Science, 1971,24, 135–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. B., &Davis, D. J. Appetitive control of responding in the presence of free food: Effects of d-amphetamine and fenfluramine.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,6, 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F., Beighley, B. G., Libretto, I. S., Mollenhour, M. N., &Prytula, R. E. Contrafreeloading as a function of early environmental rearing conditions.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,6, 595–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCamp, J. E. Relative distance as a factor in the white rats’ selection of a path.Psychobiology, 1920,2, 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dember, W. N. Response by the rat to environmental change.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1956,49, 93–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denny, M. R. A theory of experimental extinction and its relation to a general theory. In H. H. Kendler & J.T. Spence (Eds.),Essays in neobehaviorism: A memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, K., &Neuringer, A. Autoshaping as a function of prior food presentation.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1976,26, 463–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, I. J. H., &Hughes, B. O. Free and operant feeding in domestic fowls.Animal Behaviour, 1972,20, 775–777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egger, M. D., &Miller, N. E. Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of the stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egger, M. D., &Miller, N. E. When is reward reinforcing?: An experimental study of the information hypothesis.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963,56, 132–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkema, S..Slavin, R., Spaeth, C., &Neuringer, A. Extinction in the presence of free food.Psychonomic Science, 1972,26, 267–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, D., Thompson, D. M., &Schild, M. E. Concurrent food and water reinforced responding under food, water, and food and water deprivation.Psychological Reports, 1965,16, 1305–1311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantino, E., &Herrnstein, R. J. Secondary reinforcement and number of primary reinforcements.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 9–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., &Skinner, B. F. Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, H. Implications of sensory reinforcement. In R. Glaser (Ed.).The nature of reinforcement. New York: Academic Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedy, J. J., &Klajner, F. Preference for information about an unmodifiable but rewarding outcome.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,95, 469–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gengerelli, J. A. Principle of maxima and minima in animal learning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1930,11, 193–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, J., Berryman, R., &Thompson, R. L. Contingency spaces and measures in classical and instrumental conditioning.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,21, 585–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hearst, E., &Jenkins, H. M. Sign-tracking: The stimulusreinforcer relation and directed action. Austin, Tex: Psychonomic Society, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. Some factors influencing behavior in a two-response situation.Transaction of the New York Academy of Science, 1958,21, 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. Superstition: A corollary of the principles of operant conditioning. In W. K. Honig (Ed.),Operant behavior-Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. On the law of effect.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970,13, 243–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., &Loveland, D. H. Food-avoidance in hungry pigeons and other perplexities.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972,18, 369–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., &Loveland, D. H. Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,24, 107–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hershiser, D., &Trapold, M. A. Preference for unsignalled over signalled direct reinforcement in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,77, 323–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hothersall, D., Huey, D., &Thatcher, K. The preference of rats for free or response-produced food.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 241–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L. Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, S. R., Navarick, D. J., &Fantino, E. “Automaintenance”: The role of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,21, 117–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, W., &Collier, G. Response effort as a determinant of instrumental performance in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,72, 263–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G. D. Preference for bar pressing over “freeloading” as a function of number of rewarded presses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,65, 451–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G. D., Leung, C. M., &Hess, D. T. “Freeloading” in the Skinner box contrasted with freeloading in the runway.Psychological Reports, 1970,27, 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanarek, R. B., &Collier, G. Effort as a determinant of choice in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,84, 332–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T., &Gollub, L. R. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962,5, 543–597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Killeen, P. Response rate as a factor in choice.Psychonomic Science, 1968,12, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish, G. B. Studies of sensory reinforcement. In W. K. Honig (Ed.),Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, K. M., McLaughlin, R. J., Gerard, I. C., Bosza, D. A., &Clipper, R. C. Rats’ preference for the more effortful of two responses as a function of prior experience.Psychological Reports, 1976,38, 931–937.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, J. F., &Carlson, C. W. Operant responding with free access to the reinforcer: A replication and extension.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffer, K., &Coulson, G. Feline indolence: Cats prefer free to response-produced food.Psychonomic Science, 1971,24, 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, J., Bourland, G., Tarte, R. D., &Vernon, C. R. Acquisition of bar pressing in nondeprived rats.Psychological Record, 1976,26, 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, Z. Y. The nature of unsuccessful acts and their order of elimination in animal behavior.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1922,2, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambe, D. R., & Guy, E. G. A comparison of the preference for free vs. earned food in rats and mongolian gerbils.Proceedings of the Ohio Academy of Science, April 1973.

  • Larson, L. D., &Tarte, R. D. The effects of training and effortfulness on rats’ choice behavior in a modified T-maze.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976,7, 506–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. M., Jensen, G. D., &Tapley, R. P. “Freeloading” in a runway as a function of amount of training and type of reinforcement schedule.Psychological Reports, 1968,22, 211–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. Psychological effect of effort.Psychological Bulletin, 1965,64, 183–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P., Lewin, L., Muehleisen, P., &Stoyak, M. Preference for signalled reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,22, 143–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, F. A. Incentive. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. Research issues in self-management.Behavior Therapy, 1972,3, 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J., &Bandura, A. Self-reinforcement in pigeons.Learning and Motivation, 1972,3, 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaugeilin, R. J., Kleinman, K. M., & Vaughn, L. G. Effects of prior training at leverpressing on rats’ subsequent responding for food or water in the presence of free rewards.Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1973,8, 845–846. (Summary)

  • Mitchell, D., Scott, D. W., &Williams, K. D. Container neophobia and the rats’ preference for earned food.Behavioral Biology, 1973,9, 613–624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., Williams, K. D., &Sutter, J. Container neophobia as a predictor of preference for earned foods by rats.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,4, 182–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J., &Fantino, E. Choice and response contingencies.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 197523, 339–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. J. Effects of post-weaning environment on learning in the rat.Animal Behaviour, 1973,21, 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. J. Resistance to satiation.Animal Behaviour, 1974,22, 449–466. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. J. Do rats like to work for their food?Learning and Motivation, 1974,5, 352–368. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. J., Einon, D. F., &Nicholas, D. The effects of isolation rearing on behavior inhibition in the rat.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 615–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuringer, A. J. Animals respond for food in the presence of free food.Science, 1969,166, 399–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neuringer, A. J. Many responses per food reward with free food present.Science, 1970,169, 503–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. R., &Shelby, M. Stimulus change as a factor in response maintenance with free food available.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,24, 17–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pallaud, B. Contribution à l’étude d’une situation de choix la Souris.Revue du Comportement Animal, 1971,5, 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. B., Ackil, J. E., Frommer, G. P., &Hearst, E. Conditioned approach and contact behavior towards signals for food or brain stimulation reinforcement.Science, 1972,177, 1009–1011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. L. Comparative studies of the preference for free vs. response-produced reinforcers.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1974,2, 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. Toward empirical behavior laws: I. Positive reinforcement.Psycholgical Review, 1959,66, 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H., &Baum, W. M. Effects of alternative reinforcement: Does the source matter?Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972,18, 231–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R. A., &Skucy, J. C. Effect of response-independent reinforcers during extinction.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,67, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, L. C., &Anderson, S. C. The effects of differing type and magnitude of reward on the contrafreeloading phenomenon in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1975,3, 325–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revusky, S., &Garcia, J. Learned associations over long delays. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawisch, L. P., &Denny, M. R. Reversing the reinforcement contingencies of eating and keypecking behaviors.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. On the generality of the laws of learning.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. Preference for bar-pressing to obtain reward over free-loading in rats and children.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,73, 320–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. Preference for mode of obtaining reinforcement in rats with lesions in septal or ventromedial hypothalamic area.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,80, 259–268. (a)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. The pied piper vs. the Protestant ethic.Psychology Today, 1972,5, 53–56. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., &Query, W. T. Preference for work over “free-loading” in children.Psychonomic Science, 1971,24, 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. “Superstition” in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1948,38, 168–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, R. M., Metze, L. P., &Craig, J. R. The Protestant ethic effect in a multichoice environment.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,6, 137–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiers, M., &Silberberg, A. Lever-contact responses in rats: Automaintenance with and without a negative response reinforcer dependency.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,22, 497–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, S. B., &Lott, D. F. Establishment in rats of a persistent response producing a net loss of reinforcement.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,57, 147–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarte, R. D. Earned versus free rewards phenomenon in humans.Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1972,7, 880. (Summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarte, R. D. Extinction of rats’ barpressing in the presence of free food.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1974,2, 289–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarte, R. D., &Snyder, R. L. Barpressing in the presence of free food as a function of food deprivation.Psychonomic Science, 1972,26, 169–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarte, R. D., &Snyder, R. L. Some sources of variation in the bar pressing versus freeloading phenomenon in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,84, 128–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarte, R. D., Townsend, S. G., &Vernon, C. R. Housing environments and the barpressing vs. freeloading phenomenon in rats.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973,2, 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarte, R. D., Townsend, S. G., Vernon, C. R., &Rovner, L. An examination of various deprivation-reward combinations in the barpressing vs. freeloading phenomenon in rats.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,3, 227–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarte, R. D., &Vernon, C. R. Rats’ barpressing in the presence of free food as a function of fixed-ratio schedules.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,3, 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. A limitation of the contrafreeloading phenomenon.Psychonomic Science, 1972,29, 173–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. T. Discriminability and the contrafreeloading phenomenon.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975,88, 104–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. E. An experimental investigation of the gradient of reinforcement in maze learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1944,34, 506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. Principles of performance.Psychological Review, 1955,62, 315–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, P. Complex environments: Effects on brain development.Science, 1974,185, 1035–1037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. F., Osborne, S., Norborg, J., &Fantino, E. Stimulus change contemporaneous with food presentation maintains responding in the presence of free food.Science, 1973,182, 1038–1039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. H. The principle of least effort in learning.Journal of General Psychology, 1934,16, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welker, W. I., &King, W. A. Effects of stimulus novelty on gnawing and eating by rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1962,55, 838–842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., &Williams, H. Automaintenance in the pigeon: Sustained pecking despite contingent nonreinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969,12, 511–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka, J. G. Weber’s law in the discrimination of maze distance by the white rat.University of California Publication of Psychology, 1929,4, 155–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler, M. D. Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 405–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, T. R., &Hogan, D. E. Key pecking in pigeons produced by pairing keylight with inaccessible grain.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,23, 199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, 85281, Tempe, Arizona

    Steve R. Osborne

Authors
  1. Steve R. Osborne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Osborne, S.R. The free food (contrafreeloading) phenomenon: A review and analysis. Animal Learning & Behavior 5, 221–235 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209232

Download citation

  • Received: 07 October 1976

  • Accepted: 03 May 1977

  • Issue Date: September 1977

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209232

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Stimulus Change
  • Free Food
  • Conditioned Reinforcer
  • Experimental Analysis ofBehavior
  • Siamese Fighting Fish
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

18.207.160.97

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature