Animals will perform an operant response to obtain food when abundant free food is available. These data have implications for current learning theories, especially in terms of the motivational variables associated with such behavior. The present paper reviews the literature and provides an analysis that suggests that responding for food in the presence of free food is importantly controlled by stimulus change attendant upon response-dependent food presentation. This apparent stimulus-reinforcer effect on behavior is compared to that observed in other areas of animal learning research that include preference between schedules of response-dependent and response-independent reinforcement, preference between schedules of signaled and unsignaled reinforcement, autoshaping and automaintenance, and self-reinforcement in animals.
Knopp, J., & Bourland, G.Rats barpress for food in the presence of free food under a variety of free food conditions. Paper presented at Western Psychological Association. April 1972.
Alferink, L. A., Crossman, E. K., &Cheney, C. D. Control of responding by a conditioned rein forcer in the presence of free food.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 38–40.
Appel, J. B. Aversive aspects of a schedule of positive reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963,6, 423–428.
Atnip, G., &Hothersall, D. The preference of albino rats for free or response-produced food.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973,2, 153–154.
Baenninger, R., &Mattleman, R. A. Visual reinforcement: Operant acquisition in the presence of a free mirror.Animal Learnings Behavior, 1973,1, 302–306.
Barnes, G. W., &Baron, A. Stimulus complexity and sensory reinforcement.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1961,54, 466–469.
Barnett, S. A. The rat: A study in behavior. Chicago: Aldine, 1963.
Bilbrey, J. L., Patterson, D. D., &Winokur, S. Maintenance and autoshaping of keypecking in undeprived pigeons.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973,2, 394–396.
Bindra, D. A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior modification.Psychological Review, 1974,81, 199–213.
Blanchard, R., Honig, W. K. Surprise value of food determines its effectiveness as a reinforcer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1976,2, 67–74.
Bolles, R. C. Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 394–409.
Brown, P. L., &Jenkins, H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon’s key peck.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 1–8.
Cantor, M. B. Signalled reinforcing brain stimulation facilitates operant behavior under schedules of intermittent reinforcement.Science, 1971,174, 610–612.
Cantor, M. B., &LoLordo, V. M. Rats prefer signalled reinforcing brain stimulation to unsignalled ESB.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,71, 183–191.
Cantor, M. B., &LoLordo, V. M. Reward value of brain stimulation is inversely related to uncertainty about its onset.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,79, 259–270.
Carder, B. Rats’ preference for earned in comparison with free liquid reinforcers.Psychonomic Science, 1972,26, 25–26.
Carder, B., &Beckman, G. C. Limitations of “container neophobia” as an explanation of rats’ responding for food in the presence of free food.Behavioral Biology, 1975,14, 109–113.
Carder, B., &Berkowitz, K. Rats preference for earned in comparison with free food.Science, 1970,167, 1273–1274.
Carlson, C. N., &Riccio, D. C. Experience with the reinforcer and the preference for earned rather than free reinforcers in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1976,4, 269–272.
Coburn, J. F., &Tarte, R. D. The effects of rearing environments on the contrafreeloading phenomenon in rats.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1976,26, 289–294.
Cohen-Salmon, C., &Blancheteau, M. Transport et consommation de la norriture dans un parcour expérimental chez le rat blanc.L’Année Psychologique, 1967,67, 377–384.
Collier, G., &Jennings, J. W. Work as a determinant of instrumental performance.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,68, 659–662.
D’Amato, M. R. Derived motives,Annual Review of Psychology, 1974,25, 83–106.
Davidson, A. Factors affecting keypress responding by rats in the presence of free food.Psychonomic Science, 1971,24, 135–137.
Davidson, A. B., &Davis, D. J. Appetitive control of responding in the presence of free food: Effects of d-amphetamine and fenfluramine.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,6, 16–18.
Davis, S. F., Beighley, B. G., Libretto, I. S., Mollenhour, M. N., &Prytula, R. E. Contrafreeloading as a function of early environmental rearing conditions.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,6, 595–597.
DeCamp, J. E. Relative distance as a factor in the white rats’ selection of a path.Psychobiology, 1920,2, 245–253.
Dember, W. N. Response by the rat to environmental change.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1956,49, 93–95.
Denny, M. R. A theory of experimental extinction and its relation to a general theory. In H. H. Kendler & J.T. Spence (Eds.),Essays in neobehaviorism: A memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
Downing, K., &Neuringer, A. Autoshaping as a function of prior food presentation.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1976,26, 463–469.
Duncan, I. J. H., &Hughes, B. O. Free and operant feeding in domestic fowls.Animal Behaviour, 1972,20, 775–777.
Egger, M. D., &Miller, N. E. Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of the stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 97–104.
Egger, M. D., &Miller, N. E. When is reward reinforcing?: An experimental study of the information hypothesis.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963,56, 132–137.
Enkema, S..Slavin, R., Spaeth, C., &Neuringer, A. Extinction in the presence of free food.Psychonomic Science, 1972,26, 267–269.
Fallon, D., Thompson, D. M., &Schild, M. E. Concurrent food and water reinforced responding under food, water, and food and water deprivation.Psychological Reports, 1965,16, 1305–1311.
Fantino, E., &Herrnstein, R. J. Secondary reinforcement and number of primary reinforcements.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 9–14.
Ferster, C. B., &Skinner, B. F. Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
Fowler, H. Implications of sensory reinforcement. In R. Glaser (Ed.).The nature of reinforcement. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Furedy, J. J., &Klajner, F. Preference for information about an unmodifiable but rewarding outcome.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,95, 469–471.
Gengerelli, J. A. Principle of maxima and minima in animal learning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1930,11, 193–236.
Gibbon, J., Berryman, R., &Thompson, R. L. Contingency spaces and measures in classical and instrumental conditioning.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,21, 585–605.
Hearst, E., &Jenkins, H. M. Sign-tracking: The stimulusreinforcer relation and directed action. Austin, Tex: Psychonomic Society, 1974.
Herrnstein, R. J. Some factors influencing behavior in a two-response situation.Transaction of the New York Academy of Science, 1958,21, 35–45.
Herrnstein, R. J. Superstition: A corollary of the principles of operant conditioning. In W. K. Honig (Ed.),Operant behavior-Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
Herrnstein, R. J. On the law of effect.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970,13, 243–266.
Herrnstein, R. J., &Loveland, D. H. Food-avoidance in hungry pigeons and other perplexities.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972,18, 369–383.
Herrnstein, R. J., &Loveland, D. H. Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,24, 107–116
Hershiser, D., &Trapold, M. A. Preference for unsignalled over signalled direct reinforcement in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,77, 323–328.
Hothersall, D., Huey, D., &Thatcher, K. The preference of rats for free or response-produced food.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 241–243.
Hull, C. L. Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.
Hursh, S. R., Navarick, D. J., &Fantino, E. “Automaintenance”: The role of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,21, 117–124.
Jennings, W., &Collier, G. Response effort as a determinant of instrumental performance in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,72, 263–266.
Jensen, G. D. Preference for bar pressing over “freeloading” as a function of number of rewarded presses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,65, 451–454.
Jensen, G. D., Leung, C. M., &Hess, D. T. “Freeloading” in the Skinner box contrasted with freeloading in the runway.Psychological Reports, 1970,27, 67–73.
Kanarek, R. B., &Collier, G. Effort as a determinant of choice in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,84, 332–338.
Kelleher, R. T., &Gollub, L. R. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962,5, 543–597.
Killeen, P. Response rate as a factor in choice.Psychonomic Science, 1968,12, 34.
Kish, G. B. Studies of sensory reinforcement. In W. K. Honig (Ed.),Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
Kleinman, K. M., McLaughlin, R. J., Gerard, I. C., Bosza, D. A., &Clipper, R. C. Rats’ preference for the more effortful of two responses as a function of prior experience.Psychological Reports, 1976,38, 931–937.
Knutson, J. F., &Carlson, C. W. Operant responding with free access to the reinforcer: A replication and extension.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 133–136.
Koffer, K., &Coulson, G. Feline indolence: Cats prefer free to response-produced food.Psychonomic Science, 1971,24, 41–42.
Kopp, J., Bourland, G., Tarte, R. D., &Vernon, C. R. Acquisition of bar pressing in nondeprived rats.Psychological Record, 1976,26, 49–54.
Kuo, Z. Y. The nature of unsuccessful acts and their order of elimination in animal behavior.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1922,2, 1–27.
Lambe, D. R., & Guy, E. G. A comparison of the preference for free vs. earned food in rats and mongolian gerbils.Proceedings of the Ohio Academy of Science, April 1973.
Larson, L. D., &Tarte, R. D. The effects of training and effortfulness on rats’ choice behavior in a modified T-maze.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976,7, 506–508.
Leung, C. M., Jensen, G. D., &Tapley, R. P. “Freeloading” in a runway as a function of amount of training and type of reinforcement schedule.Psychological Reports, 1968,22, 211–214.
Lewis, M. Psychological effect of effort.Psychological Bulletin, 1965,64, 183–190.
Lewis, P., Lewin, L., Muehleisen, P., &Stoyak, M. Preference for signalled reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,22, 143–150.
Logan, F. A. Incentive. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1960.
Mahoney, M. J. Research issues in self-management.Behavior Therapy, 1972,3, 45–63.
Mahoney, M. J., &Bandura, A. Self-reinforcement in pigeons.Learning and Motivation, 1972,3, 293–303.
McLaugeilin, R. J., Kleinman, K. M., & Vaughn, L. G. Effects of prior training at leverpressing on rats’ subsequent responding for food or water in the presence of free rewards.Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1973,8, 845–846. (Summary)
Mitchell, D., Scott, D. W., &Williams, K. D. Container neophobia and the rats’ preference for earned food.Behavioral Biology, 1973,9, 613–624.
Mitchell, D., Williams, K. D., &Sutter, J. Container neophobia as a predictor of preference for earned foods by rats.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,4, 182–184.
Moore, J., &Fantino, E. Choice and response contingencies.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 197523, 339–348.
Morgan, M. J. Effects of post-weaning environment on learning in the rat.Animal Behaviour, 1973,21, 429–442.
Morgan, M. J. Resistance to satiation.Animal Behaviour, 1974,22, 449–466. (a)
Morgan, M. J. Do rats like to work for their food?Learning and Motivation, 1974,5, 352–368. (b)
Morgan, M. J., Einon, D. F., &Nicholas, D. The effects of isolation rearing on behavior inhibition in the rat.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 615–634.
Neuringer, A. J. Animals respond for food in the presence of free food.Science, 1969,166, 399–401.
Neuringer, A. J. Many responses per food reward with free food present.Science, 1970,169, 503–504.
Osborne, S. R., &Shelby, M. Stimulus change as a factor in response maintenance with free food available.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,24, 17–21.
Pallaud, B. Contribution à l’étude d’une situation de choix la Souris.Revue du Comportement Animal, 1971,5, 293–297.
Peterson, G. B., Ackil, J. E., Frommer, G. P., &Hearst, E. Conditioned approach and contact behavior towards signals for food or brain stimulation reinforcement.Science, 1972,177, 1009–1011.
Powell, R. L. Comparative studies of the preference for free vs. response-produced reinforcers.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1974,2, 185–188.
Premack, D. Toward empirical behavior laws: I. Positive reinforcement.Psycholgical Review, 1959,66, 219–233.
Rachlin, H., &Baum, W. M. Effects of alternative reinforcement: Does the source matter?Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972,18, 231–241.
Rescorla, R. A., &Skucy, J. C. Effect of response-independent reinforcers during extinction.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,67, 381–389.
Robertson, L. C., &Anderson, S. C. The effects of differing type and magnitude of reward on the contrafreeloading phenomenon in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1975,3, 325–328.
Revusky, S., &Garcia, J. Learned associations over long delays. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Sawisch, L. P., &Denny, M. R. Reversing the reinforcement contingencies of eating and keypecking behaviors.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 189–192.
Seligman, M. E. P. On the generality of the laws of learning.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 406–418.
Singh, D. Preference for bar-pressing to obtain reward over free-loading in rats and children.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,73, 320–327.
Singh, D. Preference for mode of obtaining reinforcement in rats with lesions in septal or ventromedial hypothalamic area.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,80, 259–268. (a)
Singh, D. The pied piper vs. the Protestant ethic.Psychology Today, 1972,5, 53–56. (b)
Singh, D., &Query, W. T. Preference for work over “free-loading” in children.Psychonomic Science, 1971,24, 77–79.
Skinner, B. F. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1938.
Skinner, B. F. “Superstition” in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1948,38, 168–172.
Stephens, R. M., Metze, L. P., &Craig, J. R. The Protestant ethic effect in a multichoice environment.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,6, 137–139.
Stiers, M., &Silberberg, A. Lever-contact responses in rats: Automaintenance with and without a negative response reinforcer dependency.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,22, 497–506.
Stolz, S. B., &Lott, D. F. Establishment in rats of a persistent response producing a net loss of reinforcement.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,57, 147–149.
Tarte, R. D. Earned versus free rewards phenomenon in humans.Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1972,7, 880. (Summary)
Tarte, R. D. Extinction of rats’ barpressing in the presence of free food.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1974,2, 289–292.
Tarte, R. D., &Snyder, R. L. Barpressing in the presence of free food as a function of food deprivation.Psychonomic Science, 1972,26, 169–170.
Tarte, R. D., &Snyder, R. L. Some sources of variation in the bar pressing versus freeloading phenomenon in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,84, 128–133.
Tarte, R. D., Townsend, S. G., &Vernon, C. R. Housing environments and the barpressing vs. freeloading phenomenon in rats.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973,2, 69–71.
Tarte, R. D., Townsend, S. G., Vernon, C. R., &Rovner, L. An examination of various deprivation-reward combinations in the barpressing vs. freeloading phenomenon in rats.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,3, 227–229.
Tarte, R. D., &Vernon, C. R. Rats’ barpressing in the presence of free food as a function of fixed-ratio schedules.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,3, 34–36.
Taylor, G. A limitation of the contrafreeloading phenomenon.Psychonomic Science, 1972,29, 173–174.
Taylor, G. T. Discriminability and the contrafreeloading phenomenon.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975,88, 104–109.
Thompson, M. E. An experimental investigation of the gradient of reinforcement in maze learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1944,34, 506–515.
Tolman, E. C. Principles of performance.Psychological Review, 1955,62, 315–326.
Wallace, P. Complex environments: Effects on brain development.Science, 1974,185, 1035–1037.
Wallace, R. F., Osborne, S., Norborg, J., &Fantino, E. Stimulus change contemporaneous with food presentation maintains responding in the presence of free food.Science, 1973,182, 1038–1039.
Waters, R. H. The principle of least effort in learning.Journal of General Psychology, 1934,16, 3–20.
Welker, W. I., &King, W. A. Effects of stimulus novelty on gnawing and eating by rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1962,55, 838–842.
Williams, D. R., &Williams, H. Automaintenance in the pigeon: Sustained pecking despite contingent nonreinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969,12, 511–520.
Yoshioka, J. G. Weber’s law in the discrimination of maze distance by the white rat.University of California Publication of Psychology, 1929,4, 155–184.
Zeiler, M. D. Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 405–414.
Zentall, T. R., &Hogan, D. E. Key pecking in pigeons produced by pairing keylight with inaccessible grain.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,23, 199–206.
About this article
Cite this article
Osborne, S.R. The free food (contrafreeloading) phenomenon: A review and analysis. Animal Learning & Behavior 5, 221–235 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209232
- Stimulus Change
- Free Food
- Conditioned Reinforcer
- Experimental Analysis ofBehavior
- Siamese Fighting Fish