Abstract
Three experiments were conducted to isolate conditions in which readers make their representations of text more concrete by instantiating (inferring a specific instance of) category terms. In previous research using single-sentence contexts and a modified Stroop task as an on-line measure of comprehension, no evidence for instantiation was obtained. In the present experiments, the modified Stroop task was used to test for instantiation when category terms were referred to anaphorically in subsequent sentences and when the category terms served as the subjects of single-sentence contexts. The pattern of the Stroop effects was dependent upon whether typical or atypical exemplars were suggested by the context. Facilitation of color naming was obtained in the former case, and interference was obtained in the latter case when the instances followed the appropriate biasing contexts. The results highlight the role of foregrounding and context in guiding the use of elaborative inferences.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, R. C., Pichert, J. W., Goetz, E. T., Shallert, D. L., Stevens, K. W., &Trollip, S. R. (1976). Instantiation of general terms.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 667–679.
Anderson, R. C., &Shifrin, Z. (1980). The meaning of words in context. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W F Brewer (Eds.),Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 331–348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bransford, J. D., &Johnson, M. D. (1973). Considerations of some problems in comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed),Visual information processing New York: Academic Press.
Chafe, W. (1972). Discourse structure and human knowledge. In J. B. Carroll & R. O. Freedle (Eds.),Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge (pp 41–69). Washington, DC: Winston.
Clark, H. (1978). Inferences in comprehension. In D. LaBerge & S. Samuels (Eds.),Basic processes in reading, perception and comprehension (pp 243–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Conrad, C. (1974). Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon.Memory & Cognition,2, 130–138.
Dosher, B. A., &Corbett, A. T. (1982). Instrument inferences and verb schemata.Memory & Cognition,10, 531–539.
Garnham, A. (1979). Instantiation of verbs.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,31, 207–214.
Garnham, A. (1982). Testing psychological theories about inference making.Memory & Cognition,10, 341–349.
Garrod, S., &Sanford, A. J. (1977). Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 77–90.
Garrod, S., &Sanford, A. J. (1981). Bridging inferences and the extended domain of reference. In J. Long & A. Baddley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 331–346). Hillsdale, NJ: Edbaum.
Greenspan, S. L., &Segal, E. M. (1984). Reference and comprehension: A topic-comment analysis of sentence-picture verification.Cognitive Psychology,16, 556–606.
Gumenik, W. E. (1979). The advantage of specific terms over general terms as cues for sentence recall: Instantiation or retrieval?Memory & Cognition,7, 240–244.
Hornby, P. A. (1972). The psychological subject and predicate.Cogmtive Psychology,3, 632–642.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Kintsch, W., &Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review,85, 363–394.
Koriat, A. (1981). Semantic facilitation in lexical decisions as a function of prime-target association.Memory & Cognition,6, 372–375.
McFarland, C. E., JR.,Duncan, E. M., &Kellas, G. (1978). Isolating the typicality effect in semantic memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,30, 251–262.
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1980). The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 668–682
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1981). The comprehension processes and memory structures revolved in instrumental inference.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 671–682.
Murphy, G. L. (1984). Establishing and accessing referents in discourse.Memory & Cognitton,12, 489–497.
Neill, W. T. (1978). Decision processes in selective attention: Response priming in the Stroop color-word task.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 80–84
Oden, G. C., &Spira, J. L. (1983). Influence of context on the activation and selection of ambiguous word senses.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 51–64.
Posner, M. I. (1978).Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 56–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories In T. E. Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111–144). New York: Academic Press.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 192–233.
Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. B. (1975) Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology,7, 573–605
Sanford, A. J &Garrod, S. C. (1981).Understanding written language New York. Wiley.
Singer, M. (1979). Processes of inference during sentence encoding.Memory & Cognition,7, 192–200
Smith, E. E., &Medin, D. L. (1981).Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
Spiro, R. J. (1980). Constructive processes m prose comprehension and recall In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.),Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 245–278). Hdtsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
STroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662
Uyeda, K. M., &,Mandler, G. (1980). Prototypicality norms for 28 semantic categories.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 587–595.
Warren, R. E. (1972). Stimulus encoding and memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,94, 90–100.
Whitney, P., &Kellas, G. (1984). Processing category terms in context Instantiation and the structure of semantic categoriesJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10 95–103
Whitney, P., McKay, T., Kellas, G., &Emerson, W. A, JR. (1985). Semantic activation of noun concepts m context.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 126–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was partially supported by University of Kansas General Research Fund Grant No. 34089-0038 and by the Mane Wilson Howell’s bequest to the Psychology Department of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. It formed the basis of a dissertation submitted to the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Ph.D.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitney, P. Processing category terms in context: Instantiations as inferences. Memory & Cognition 14, 39–48 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209227
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209227