Abstract
In contrast to the findings of Bransford and Franks (1971) that no specific information is retained about acquisition sentences in their recognition memory paradigm, it was shown that subjects can consistently distinguish OLDs from NEWs when visual presentation is used, but not when auditory presentation is used. This is in agreement with the speculation of Katz and Gruenewald (1974) as to why such a split was observed in their study. This difference also has a bearing on the typical finding of no modality effects in long-term memory, as compared to the consistent superiority of auditory presentation in short-term memory. It was also found that blocking semantically related sentences during acquisition heightened the perceived “OLDness” of test sentences compared to nonblocked presentation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barclay, J. R. The role of comprehension in remembering sentences.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 229–254.
Begg, I. Recognition memory for sentence meaning and wording.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971,10, 176–181.
Bever, T. G. Perception, thought, and language. In J. B. Carroll & R. O. Freedle (Eds.),Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1972.
Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. The abstraction of linguistic ideas.Cognitive Psychology, 1971,2, 331–350.
Cofer, C. N. Constructive processes in memory.American Scientist, 1973,61, 537–543.
Flagg, P. W. Semantic integration in sentence memory?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, in press.
Flagg, P. W., Potts, G. R., &Reynolds, A. G. Instructions and response strategies in recognition memory for sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,1, 592–598.
Graesser, A., &Mandler, G. Recognition memory for the meaning and surface structure of sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,104, 238–248.
Katz, S. Role of instructions in abstraction of linguistic ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,98, 79–84.
Katzo S., &Gruenewald, P. The abstraction of linguistic ideas in “meaningless” sentences.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 737–741.
Neumann, P. G. An attribute frequency model for the abstraction of prototypes.Memory. & Cognition, 1974,2, 241–248.
Paris, S. G., &Carter, A. Y. Semantic and constructive aspects of sentence memory in children.Developmental Psychology, 1973,9, 109–113.
Penney, C. G. Modality effects in short-term verbal memory.Psychological Bulletin, 1975,82, 68–84.
Reitman, J. S., &Bower, G. H. Storage and later recognition of exemplars of concepts.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 194–206.
Sachs, J. S. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse.Perception & Psychophysics, 1967,2, 437–442.
Sachs, J. S. Memory in reading and listening to discourse.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 95–100.
Singer, M. A replication of Bransford and Franks’ (1971) “The abstraction of linguistic ideas.”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973,1, 416–418.
Small, O. W. The abstraction of arbitrary categories.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 581–585.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flagg, P.W., Reynolds, A.G. Modality of presentation and blocking in sentence recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 5, 111–115 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209201
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209201