Abstract
Two studies were designed to investigate the effects of prior information about plausible causes on subsequent attributions. In the Experiment 1, prior information was given about an internal and an external cause. It was predicted and found that the stronger an expectancy for a behavior, the more the behavior would be attributed to the cause that formed the basis of the expectancy. It was also predicted that (1) for facilitative causes, the stronger the expectancy based on a given cause, the less the behavior would be attributed to other causes (discounting), and (2)for inhibitory causes, the stronger the expectancy, the more the behavior would be attributed to other causes (augmenting). These predictions were not supported. It was suggested that discounting and augmenting did not occur because subjects had been given information about both causes which “locked in” their attributions to each cause. To test this explanation, a second study was undertaken in which observers were given information about only one cause. The results of Experiment 2 indicated that discounting and augmenting may only occur for attributions to causes about which no prior information is available.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Calder, B. J. Information cues and attributions based on role behavior.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1974,10, 121–125.
Frieze, I., &Weiner, B. Cue utilization and attributional judgments for success and failure.Journal of Personality, 1971,39, 591–605.
Joints, E. E., &Davis, K. E. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. II). New York: Academic Press, 1965.
Jones, E. E., Daws, K. E., &Gergen, K. J. Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961,63, 302–310.
Jones, E. E., Worcel, S., Goethals, G. R., &Grumet, J. F. Prior expectancy and behavioral extremity as determinants of attitude attribution.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971,7, 59–80.
Jones, R. A., Linder, D. E., Kiesler, C. A., Zanna, M.. &Brehm, J. W. Internal states or external stimuli: Observers’ attitude judgments and the dissonance theory/self-persuasion controversy.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1968,4, 247–269.
Kelley, H. H.Attribution in social interaction. Morristown, N.J: General Learning Press, 1971.
Kelley, H. H.Causal schemata and the attribution process. Morristown, N.J: General Learning Press, 1972.
Messick, D. M., &Reedem, G. Perceived motivation, role variations, and the attribution of personal characteristics.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1972,8, 482–491.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMHGrant 22249 to Walter G. Stephan.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosenfield, D., Stephan, W.G. When discounting fails: An unexpected finding. Memory & Cognition 5, 97–102 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209199
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209199