Abstract
An experiment examined the effects of sex of subjects, sex of moderator, and seating distance between members of a small group on moods, evaluations, attraction, and attitude expression. Groups of three subjects and a moderator discussed a socially relevant issue and then made several ratings. During the discussion, group members sat either very close to each other or "very far apart, q?he expectation that males would react unfavorably while females would react favorably to close seating was not obtained. Instead, sex of moderator interacted strongly with distance. Regardless of sex, groups were more positive close to a female moderator and far from a male moderator. Attitudes showed the same interaction. Interpretations were that (1) the ranking person helps define the spacing norms for a group, and (2) there are sex differences in “personal space.”
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference notes
Lett, E. E., Clark, W., & Altman, I.A propositional inventory of research on interpersonal distance, 1969, Research Report No. I, Naval Medical Research Institute.
Dabbs, J. M., Jr., Johns, C. J., & Powell, P. H.Less eye contact when closer? Depends upon your partner’s sex. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., September, 1976.
References
Argyle, M., &Dean, J. Eye contact, distance and affiliation.Sociometry, 1965,28, 289–304.
Baxter, J, C. Interpersonal spacing in natural settings.Sociometry, 1970,33, 444–456.
Byrne, D. The influence of propinquity and opportunities for interaction on classroom relationships.Human Relations, 1961,14, 63–69.
Dabbs, J. M., JR. Physical closeness and negative feelings.Psvchonomic Science, 1971,23, 141–143.
Dosey, M. A., &Meisels, M. Personal space and selfprotection.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969,11, 93–97.
Freedman, J. L., Klevansky, S., &Ehrlich, P. R. The effect of crowding on human task performance.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1971,1, 7–25.
Freedman, J. L., Levy, A., Buchanan, R., &Price, J. Crowding and human aggressiveness.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1972,8, 528–548.
Giesen, M., &Hendrick, C. Effects of seating distance and room illumination on the affective outcomes of small group interaction.Social Behavior and Personality, 1974,2, 87–96.
Giesen, M., &Mcclaren, H. A. Discussion, distance, and sex: Changes in impressions and attraction during small group interaction.Sociometry, 1976,39, 60–70.
Hendrick, C., Giesen, M., &Coy, S. The social ecology of free seating arrangements in a small group interaction context.Sociometry. 1974,37, 262–274.
Jourard, S. M., &Friedman, R. Experimenter-subject “distance” and self-disclosure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970,15, 278–282.
Leibman, M. The effects of sex and race norms on personal space.Environment and Behavior, 1970,2, 208–246.
Lott, D. F., &Sommer, R. Seating arrangements and status.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967,7, 90–95.
Marshall, J. E., &Heslin, R. Boys and girls together: Sexual composition and the effect of density and group size on cohesiveness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975,31, 952–961.
Mcbride, G., King, M. G., &James, J. W. Social proximity effects on galvanic skin responses in adult humans.Journal of Psychology, 1965,61, 153–157.
Mehrabian, A. Relationship of attitude to seated posture, orientation, and distance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968,10, 26–30.
Meisels, M., &Guardo, C. J. Development of personal space schemata.Child Development, 1969,40, 1167–1178.
Ross, M., Layton, B., Erickson, B., &Schopler, J. Affect. facial regard, and reactions to crowding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973,28, 69–76.
Stokols, D., Rall, M., Pinner, B., &Schopler, J. Physical, social and personal determinants of the perception of crowding.Environment and Behavior. 1973,5,87–115.
Walster, E., &Berscheid, E. Adrenaline makes the heart grow fonder.Psychology Today. June 1971,62, 47–50.
Willis, F. N. JR. Initial speaking distance as a function of the speakers relationship.Psychonomic Science. 1966,5, 221–222.
Zaionc, R. B.Social psychology: An experimental approach. Belmont, Calif: Brooks/Cole, 1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by an institutional grant to the first author from Mississippi State University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giesen, M., Hendrick, C. Physical distance and sex in moderated groups: Neglected factors in small group interaction. Memory & Cognition 5, 79–83 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209196
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209196