Abstract
Two release from proactive inhibition experiments were conducted, in which orienting tasks were employed to direct subjects’ attention to particular features of words. Experiment 1 employed two such tasks which emphasized either semantic or nonsemantic features, while both orienting tasks in Experiment 2 directed attention to semantic features of words. Although significant release was obtained with a change in task in these experiments, the level was considerably lower in Experiment 2 than in Experiment 1. The data were interpreted in terms of a theoretical orientation that emphasizes item differentiation as a major determinant of retrieval probability. It was argued that the degree of differentiation depends to some extent on the specific tasks employed and the extent to which they direct attention to different word features.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Battig, W. F., &Montague, W. E. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1969,80(June, Part 2), 1–46.
Bird, C. P. On the role of processing requirements in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 234–243.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.
Hyde, T. S. The differential effects of effort and type of orienting task on the recall and organization of highly-associated words.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,97, 111–113.
Hyde, T. S., &Jenkins, J. J. The differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly-associated words.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,82, 472–481.
Johnston, C. D., &Jenkins, J. J. Two more incidental tasks that differentially affect associative clustering and recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,89, 92–95.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N.Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence: Brown University Press, 1967.
Watkins, O. C., &Watkins, M. J. Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,1, 442–452.
Wickens, D. D. Characteristics of word encoding. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, D.C: V. H. Winston, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bird, C.P. Proactive inhibition as a function of orienting task characteristics. Memory & Cognition 5, 27–31 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209188
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209188