Abstract
Previous work has shown that when a delay of reward (DOR) is introduced into a well-learned discrimination, even gradually, discriminative performance deteriorates and, with moderately long DORs, does not recover with practice. The present experiment assessed whether the decrement in performance was due to an associative loss or to a decline in the incentive value of the reward object caused by the DOR. Cebus monkeys were trained on a simple visual discrimination and tested with either a DOR or an identical delay period which preceded the appearance of S+ and S− (“predelay” trials); reinforcement on predelay trials was immediate. On half of the daily trials, the animals were given the option of choosing either the DOR or the predelay trial. The duration of the delay was increased gradually until terminal delays of 32 to 128 sec were reached. All four animals maintained almost errorless performance on predelay trials; in contrast, their error rate reached 36% on DOR trials. Surprisingly, none of the animals learned to choose predelay over DOR trials. Both results were interpreted in terms of the incentive loss hypothesis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainslie, G. Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.Psychological Bulletin, 1975,82, 463–496.
Bullock, M. A., &Richards, R. W. Disruption of fixed ratio performance as a function of reinforcement delay.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973,1, 49–52.
D’Amato, M. R., &Cox, J. K. Delay of consequences and shortterm memory in monkeys. In D. L. Medin, W. A. Roberts, & R. T. Davis (Eds.),Processes in animal memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
Davenport, J. The interaction of magnitude and delay of reinforcement in spatial discrimination.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1962,55, 267–273.
Ferster, C. B., &Hammer, C. Variables determining the effects of delay of reinforcement,Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1965,8, 243–254.
Logan, F. A. Decision making by rats: Delay versus amount of reward.Journal qf ComFarative and Physiological Psychology, 1965,59, 1–12.
Mishkin, M., &Weiskrantz, L. Effects of delaying reward on visual-discrimination performance in monkeys with frontal lesions.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1958,51, 276–281.
Mowrer, O. H. Learning theol, and behavior. New York: Wiley, 1960.
Renner, K. E. Delay of reintbrcement: A historical review.Psychological Bulletin, 1964,61, 341–361.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant GB-40111.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, J.K., D’Amato, M.R. Disruption of overlearned discriminative behavior in monkeys (Cebus paella) by delay of reward. Animal Learning & Behavior 5, 93–98 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209137
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209137