Abstract
The present experiment was undertaken to examine directly the diet sampling behavior of wild Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) faced with a choice among familiar and unfamiliar foods. First-generation, laboratory-reared wild Norway rats ate from four food cups. Three of the food cups were in unfamiliar locations and contained unfamiliar foods. The remaining food cup was in a familiar location and contained a familiar food. Subjects in a control group were offered the familiar food in all four locations. We found (1) that subjects in experimental and control conditions took equal amounts of time to first visit food cups in unfamiliar locations, (2) that subjects in the experimental condition (those with access to unfamiliar foods) ate at unfamiliar locations at a slower rate than did subjects in the control condition (those with access only to familiar food), (3) that subjects in the experimental condition were no more likely than subjects in the control condition to eat at one unfamiliar location at a time, and (4) that following a bout of eating at an unfamiliar food cup, subjects in the experimental condition waited no longer than subjects in the control condition before eating from a different unfamiliar food cup. We interpreted these data as indicating that although wild Norway rats are hesitant to eat unfamiliar foods, once they begin to eat such foods, they do not sample among them so as to facilitate identification of any toxin present.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barnett, S. A. (1956). Behaviour components in the feeding of wild and laboratory rats.Behaviour,9, 24–42.
Barnett, S. A. (1958). Experiments on ‘neophobia’ in wild and laboratory rats.British Journal of Psychology,49, 195–201.
Cowan, P. E. (1977). Neophobia and neophilia: New object and new place reactions of threeRattus species.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,91, 63–71.
Freeland, W. J., &Janzen, D. H. (1974). Strategies in herbivory by mammals: The role of secondary plant compounds.American Naturalist,108, 269–289.
Galef, B. G., Jr. (1970). Aggression and timidity: Responses to novelty in feral Norway rats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,70, 370–381.
Kalat, J. W., &Rozin, P. (1970). “Salience”: A factor which can override temporal contiguity in taste-aversion learning.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,71, 192–197.
Kalat, J. W., &Rozin, P. (1973). Learned safety as a mechanism in long-delay taste-aversion learning in rats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,83, 198–207.
Kissileff, H. (1970). Free-feeding in normal and “recovered lateral” rats monitored by pellet detecting eatometer.Physiology & Behavior,5, 163–173.
Mitchell, D. (1976). Experiments on neophobia in wild and laboratory rats. A reevaluation.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,90, 190–197.
Revusky, S. H., &Bedarf, E. W. (1967). Association of illness with prior ingestion of novel foods.Science,155, 219–220.
Rozin, P. (1968). Specific aversions and neophobia resulting from vitamin deficiency or poisoning in half-wild and domestic rats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,66, 82–88.
Rozin, P. (1969) Adaptive food sampling patterns in vitamin deficient rats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,69, 126–132.
Rozin, P., &Kalat, I. W. (1971). Specific hungers and poison avoidance as adaptive specializations of learningPsychological Review,78, 459–486.
Rzóska, J. (1953). Bait shyness, a study in rat behaviour.British Journal of Animal Behaviour,1, 128–135.
Shettleworth, S. J. (1984). Function and mechanism in learning. In M. Zeiler & P. Harzern (Eds.),Biological factors in learning (pp. 1–63). New York: Wiley.
Shorten, M. (1954). The reaction of the brown rat toward changes in its environment. In D. Chitty (Ed.),Control of rats and mice (Vol. 2, pp. 307–334). Oxford. Clarendon Press.
Thompson, H. V. (1948). Studies of the behaviour of the common brown rat (Rattus norvegicus, Berkenhout).Bulletin of Animal Behaviour,6, 26–40.
Williams, G. C. (1966).Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Pnnceton University Press.
Zahorik, D. M., &Houpt, K. A. (1981). Species differences in feeding strategies, food hazards, and the ability to learn food aversions. In A. C. Kamil & T. D. Sargent (Eds.),Foraging behavior (pp. 289–310) New York: Garland Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants to B.G.G., Jr., from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the McMaster University Research Board. During the conduct of this study, M.B. held an Ontario Graduate Scholarship and C.L.H., a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Summer Studentship.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beck, M., Hitchcock, C.L. & Galef, B.G. Diet sampling by wild Norway rats offered several unfamiliar foods. Animal Learning & Behavior 16, 224–230 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209069
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209069