Abstract
Three levels (.5, 1.0, and 2.0 sec) of interstimulus interval (ISI) and presence vs absence of a masking task were manipulated in a human eyelid reflex conditioning situation. Through the use of a two-phase model of conditioning performance, it was concluded that (1) increasing the ISI and introducing a masking task increased the duration of Phase 1, (2) as ISI increased, the amount of conditioning decreased, (3) the trial-by-trial rate of change in response probability increased as a function of ISI, and (4) the masking task reduced operator limits. It was also noted that the typical ISI function is composed of rate effects at short ISis and conditioning limit effects at long ISIs and that the larger 0 at larger ISis does not follow from a model of the stimulus trace hypothesis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, N. H. Temporal properties of response evocation. In R. R. Bush and W. K. Estes (Eds.)Studies in mathematical learning theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1959, Pp. 125–134.
Chandler, J. P. STEPIT: Finds local minima of a smooth function of several parameters. (CPA 312) Behavioral Science, 1969, 14, 81–82.
Ebel, H. C., & Prokasy, W. F. Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 65, 52–58.
Gorrnezano, I., & Moore, J. W. Classical conditioning. In M. H. Marx (Ed.),Learning: Processes. London: MacMillian, 1969, Pp. 121–203.
Hull, C. L.Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.
Hull, C. L.A behavior system. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1952.
Norman, M. F. A two-phase model and an application to verbal discrimination learning. In R. C. Atkinson (Ed.),Studies in mathematical psychology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964, Pp. 173–187.
Prokasy, W. F. Developments with the two-phase model applied to human eyelid conditioning. In A. H. Black and W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972, Pp. 119–147.
Prokasy, W. F. A two-phase model account of aversive classical conditioning performance in humans and rabbits. Learning & Motivation, in press.
Prokasy, W. F., Ebel, H. C., & Thompson, D. D. Response shaping at long interstimulus intervals in classical eyelid conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 138–141.
Ross, L. E. Cognitive factors in conditioning: The use of masking tasks in eyelid conditioning. In H. H. Kendler and J. T. Spence (Eds.),Essays in neobehaviorism. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971, Pp. 161–185.
Ross, L. E., Wilcox, S. M., & Mayer, M. J. A simple eyelid conditioning masking task and its effects on differential conditioning. Psychonomic Science, 1967, 9, 333–334.
Schneiderman, N., & Gormezano, I. Conditioning of the nictitating membrane of the rabbit as a function of CS-US interval. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 1964, 57, 188–195.
Spcnce, K. W.Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956.
Spence, K. W. Cogaitive factors in the extinction of the conditioned eyelid response in humans. Science, 1963, 140, 1224–1225.
Theios, J. Finite integer models for learning in individual subjects. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 292–307.
Theios, J. Mathematical models for aversive conditioning. In R. R. Brush (Ed.),Aversive conditioning and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1971, Pp. 297–346.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by NSF Grant GN-12688 to the senior author. In addition, help with the costs of parameter estimation was provided through support from the University of Utah Research Committee.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prokasy, W.F., Williams, W.C., Lee, W.Y.M. et al. Two-phase model analysis of the effects of interstimulus interval and masking task in human aversive classical conditioning. Memory & Cognition 2, 206–210 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208983
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208983