Abstract
Considerable research has demonstrated that distractor stimuli impair response to targets. Such observations suggest that distractor stimuli are analyzed at least to the level of incipient response (Eriksen, Eriksen, & Hoffman, 1986). There is also debate about the mechanisms that enable the subject to make the correct response to the target rather than the incorrect response to the distractor. One model proposes that the internal representations of distractor stimuli are inhibited during selection and execution of the response to the target (Neill, 1977; Tipper, 1985). This inhibition occurs at, or beyond, the level of abstract categorical representation, rather than at the earlier level of representations of physical properties of the distractor stimulus (Tipper & Driver, in press). An experiment is reported in which we further investigated the locus of inhibition by looking at whether or not inhibition is isolated in output modalities (for example, verbal naming or manual keypress). The evidence suggests that inhibition is isolated not in response systems, but rather at some central locus common to a variety of separate perceptual inputs and response outputs.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D. A. (1980). Attention and performance. In G. Claxton (Ed.),Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 112–153). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., &Chmiel, N. (1985). Perceptual integration and post-categorical filtering. In M. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance Xl. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Beech, A., &Claridge, G. (1987). Individual differences in negative priming: Relations with schizotypal personality traits.British Journal of Psychology,78, 349–356.
Beech, A., Baylis, G., & Claridge, G. (1987).Individual differences in schizotypy as reflected in measures of cognitive inhibition. Manuscript in preparation.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
Broadbent, D. E. (1970). Stimulus set and response set: Two kinds of selective attention. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.),Attention: Contemporary theories and analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Broadbent, D. E. (1971).Decision and stress. London: Academic Press.
Broadbent, D. E. (1982). Task combination and selective intake of information.Acta Psychologica,50, 253–290.
Broadbent, D. E., Broadbent, M. H. P., & Jones, J. (1984, January).The optional nature of selective processes of information intake. Paper presented at the meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, London.
Broadbent, D. E., &Gregory, M. (1967). Psychological refractory period and the length of time required to make a decision.Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B,168, 181–193.
Chmiel, N. (1984). Phonological recoding: the effect of concurrent articulation in a Stroop task.British Journal of Psychology,75, 213–220.
Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 529–553.
Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., &Budayr, B. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop colour-word test.Perceptual & Motor Skills,23, 1211–1214.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Eriksen, B. A., Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1986). Recognition memory and attention selection: Serial scanning is not enough.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 476–483.
Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., &O’hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 165–168.
Eriksen, C. W., &Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 249–263.
Greenwald, A. C. (1972). Evidence both for perceptual filtering and response suppression for rejected messages in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology,94, 58–67.
Lewis, J. L. (1970). Semantic processing of unattended messages using dichotic listening.Journal of Experimental Psychology,85, 225–228.
Lowe, D. G. (1979). Strategies, context, and the mechanisms of response inhibition.Memory & Cognition,7, 382–389.
Lowe, D. G. (1985). Further investigations of inhibitory mechanisms in attention.Memory & Cognition,13, 74–80.
Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibition and facilitation processes in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 444–450.
Neill, W. T., &Westberry, R. L. (1987). Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 327–334.
Posner, M. 1., Snyder, C. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Shaffer, W.O., &Laberge, D. (1979). Automatic semantic processing of unattended words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 413–426.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory effects of ignored primes.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 571–590.
Tipper, S. P., &Baylis, G. (1987). Individual differences in selective attention: The relation of priming and interference to cognitive failure.Personality & Individual Differences,8, 667–675.
Tipper, S. P., &Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 591–611.
Tipper, S. P., & Driver, J. (in press). Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli.Memory & Cognition.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Underwood, G. (1976). Semantic interference from unattended printed words.British Journal of Psychology,67, 327–338.
Underwood, G. (1977). Attention, awareness and hemisphere differences in word recognition.Neuropsychologia,15, 61–67.
Van Der Heijden, A. H. C. (1981).Shon-term visual information forgetting. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Virzi, R. A., &Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translation model of Stroop interference.Memory & Cognition,13, 304–319.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council grant awarded to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tipper, S.P., MacQueen, G.M. & Brehaut, J.C. Negative priming between response modalities: Evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics 43, 45–52 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208972
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208972