Abstract
The effects of attitudinal similarity and task-relevant affiliative status, together with three situational factors (presence or absence of a monetary reward, choice of information source or work partner, and choice made before or after Ss completed preliminary work on the task), on the choice of comparison others were examined. The most significant determinant of the comparison other chosen was attitude similarity (p < .01). There was also a significant interaction between attitude similarity, task-relevant affifliative status, and time of choice (p < .05). The nature of the interaction suggested that general impressions such as conveyed by general attitudinal information may be more important in the selection of referent others than comparability on situation-specific factors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Berscheid, E. Opinion change and communicator-communicatee similarity and dissimilarity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 670–680.
Byrne, D. Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 1961, 62, 713–715.
Byrne, D.The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Castore, C. H., & DeNinno, J. The role of relevance in the choice of comparison others. Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1972a.
Castore, C. H., & DeNinno, J. The relevance of relevance in the selection of comparison others. ONR Technical Report No. 2 (Contract No. N00014-67-A-0226), Purdue University, November 1972b.
Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954, 7, 117–140.
Siegel, S.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
Wheeler, L. Motivation as a determinant of upward comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1966, Supplement 1, 27–31.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Contract N00014-67-A-0226 from the Office of Naval Research held by the second author. The authors wish to thank Sharon Bleda and Paul Bell for their assistance in the completion of this investigation. Requests for reprints should be sent to the’ second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bleda, P.R., Castore, C.H. Social comparison, attraction, and choice of a comparison other. Memory & Cognition 1, 420–424 (1973). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208901
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208901