Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 710–715 | Cite as

Presentation modality affects false memory

  • Rebekah E. SmithEmail author
  • R. Reed HuntEmail author
Brief Reports

Abstract

Roediger and McDermott (1995) rejuvenated interest in Deese’s (1959) paradigm for producing reliable intrusions and false alarms. Using this paradigm in three experiments, we demonstrated that visual study presentation dramatically reduces the rate of false memories. Only auditory study presentation resulted in equal production of studied and critical items. Correct recall and recognition were unaffected. The suggestion that visual presentation provides a means for discriminating between false and true memories was supported by Experiment 3: Pleasantness rating of study items significantly reduced the creation of false memories regardless of modality.

Keywords

False Memory Visual Presentation Study List Item Type False Recognition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blaxton, T. A. (1988). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for the transfer appropriate processing framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaxton, T. A. (1996). Distinguishing false from true in human memory.Neuron,17, 191–194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Deese, J. (1959). On prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hashtroudi, S., Ferguson, S. A., Rappold, V. A., &Chrosniak, L. D. (1988). Data-driven and conceptually driven processes in partialword identification and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 749–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hunt, R. R., &McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 421–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hunt, R. R., &Smith, R. E. (1996). Accessing the particular from the general: The power of distinctiveness in the context of organization.Memory & Cognition,24, 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hyde, T. S., &Jenkins, J. J. (1969). Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words.Journal of Experimental Psychology,82, 472–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Israel, L., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 577–581.Google Scholar
  9. Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F., &De Leonardis, D. M. (1996). Emotional focus and source monitoring.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F., Mather, M., Kounios, J., Schacter, D. L., &Curran, T. (1997). The similarity of brain activity associated with true and false recognition memory depends on test format.Psychological Science,8, 250–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., &Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.Memory & Cognition,25, 826–837.Google Scholar
  13. McDermott, K. B. (1996). The persistence of false memories in list recall.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 212–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nairne, J. S., Neath, I., Serra, M., &Byun, E. (1997). Positional distinctiveness and the ratio rule in free recall.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., &McEvoy, C. L. (1977). Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 484–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Norman, K. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.Memory & Cognition,25, 838–848.Google Scholar
  17. Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., &Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Read, J. D. (1996). From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 105–111.Google Scholar
  19. Robinson, K. J., &Roediger, H. L., III (1997). Associative processes in false recall and false recognition.Psychological Science,8, 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schacter, D. L., Reiman, E., Curran, T., Yun, L. S., Bandy, D., Mc-Dermott, K. B., &Roediger, H. L., III (1996). Neuroanatomical correlates of veridical and illusory recognition memory: Evidence from positron emission tomography.Neuron,17, 267–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., &Pradere, D. (1996). The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboro

Personalised recommendations