Abstract
The sensitivity of the tongue to the irritation produced by ethanol was measured in five experiments. It was discovered in the first two experiments that both latency to the onset of irritation and perceived intensity of irritation varied with the locus of lingual stimulation. The tonguetip and the side of the tongue were found to be more sensitive (that is, they tended to produce higher magnitude estimates and shorter response latencies) than sites toward the middle of the tongue, with the tonguetip being the most sensitive area tested. However, even on the tonguetip the latency to onset of irritation (approximately 2–6 sec) was much longer than typical values for taste sensation. The third experiment demonstrated that increasing the size of the ethanol stimulus resulted in shorter response latencies and more intense irritation. The latter result indicates that the sensory system responsible for ethanol irritation is capable of significant (but incomplete) spatial summation. The final two experiments showed that significant summation also occurs when stimulus area is increased by adding a second stimulus at another lingual locus. Possible explanations for the regional differences in sensitivity and for the relatively long onset latencies of chemical irritation are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adriaensen, H., Gybels, J., Handwerker, H. O., &Van Hees, J. (1980). Latencies of chemically evoked discharges in human cutaneous nociceptors and of the concurrent subjective sensations.Neuroscience Letters,20, 55–59.
Adriaensen, H., Gybels, J., Handwerker, H. O., &Van Hees, J. (1983). Response properties of thin myelinated (A-delta) fibers in human skin nerves.Journal of Neurophysiology,49, 111–122.
Cain, W. S. (1976). Olfaction and the common chemical sense: Some psychophysical contrasts.Sensory Processes,1, 57–67.
Dixon, A. D. (1962). The position, incidence and origin of sensory nerve terminations in the oral mucous membrance.Archives of Oral Biology,1, 39–48.
Duner-Engstrom, M., Fredholm, B. B., Larsson, O., Lundberg, J. M., &Saria, A. (1986). Autonomic mechanisms underlying capsaicin-induced oral sensations and salivation in man.Journal of Physiology,373, 87–96.
Farbman, A. I., &Hellekant, G. (1978). Quantitative analyses of the fiber population in rat chorda tympani nerves and fungiform papillae.American Journal of Anatomy,153, 509–521.
Foster, R. W., &Ramage, A. G. (1981). The action of some chemical irritants on somatosensory receptors of the cat.Neuropharmacology,20, 191–198.
Garcia-Medina, M. R., &Cain, W. S. (1982). Bilateral integration in the common chemical sense.Physiology & Behavior,29, 349–353.
Green, B. G. (1984). Thermal perception on lingual and labial skin.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 209–220.
Green, B. G. (1985). Heat pain thresholds in the oral-facial region.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 110–114.
Green, B. G. (1986). Sensory interactions between capsaicin and temperature in the oral cavity.Chemical Senses,11, 371–382.
Greene, L. C., &Hardy, J. D. (1958). Spatial summation of pain.Journal of Applied Physiology,13, 457–464.
Hellekant, G. (1967). Action and interaction of ethyl alcohol and some other substances on the receptors of the tongue. In T. Hayashi (Ed.),Olfaction and Taste II. New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 465–479.
Renins, P. (1982). Responses of single nerve fibers to capsaicin applied to the skin.Neuroscience Letters,29, 83–88.
Kojo, I., &Pertovaara, A. (1987). The effects of stimulus area and adaptation temperature on warm and heat pain thresholds in man.International Journal of Neuroscience,32, 875–880.
Konietzny, F., &Hensel, H. (1983). The effect of capsaicin on the response characteristics of human c-polymodal nociceptors.Journal of Thermal Biology,8, 213–215.
Lawless, H. (1984). Oral chemical irritation: Psychophysical properties.Chemical Senses,9, 143–155.
Martin, S., &Pangborn, R. M. (1970). A note on the responses to ethyl alcohol before and after smoking.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 169–170.
Parker, G. H., &Stabler, E. M. (1913). On certain distinctions between taste and smell.American Journal of Physiology,32, 230–240.
Rozin, P., Ebert, L., &Schull, J. (1982). Some like it hot: A temporal analysis of hedonic responses to chili pepper.Appetite,3, 13–22.
Smith, S. E. (1972). Taste thresholds in drug addicts and alcoholics.British Journal of Addiction,67, 317–321.
Stevens, D. A., &Lawless, H. T. (1986). Putting out the fire: Effects of tastants on oral chemical irritation.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 346–350.
Stevens, J. C., &Marks, L. E. (1971). Spatial summation and the dynamics of the warmth sense.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 391–398.
Szolcsányi, J. (1987). Capsaicin and nociception.Acta Physiologica Hungarica,69, 323–332.
Van Hees, J., &Gybels, J. (1981). C nociceptor activity in human nerve during painful and non-painful stimulation.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry,44, 600–607.
Wilson, C. W. M., O’Brien, C., &MacAirt, J. G. (1973). The effect of metronidazole on the human taste threshold to alcohol.British Journal of Addiction,68, 99–110.
Yamamoto, T., Kato, T., Matsuo, R., Araie, N., Azuma, S., &Kawamura, Y. (1982). Gustatory reaction time under variable stimulus parameters in human adults.Physiology & Behavior,29, 79–84.
Yamamoto, T., &Kawamura, Y. (1981). Gustatory reaction time in human adults.Physiology & Behavior,26, 715–719
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research was supported in part by Grants NS20577 and NS20616 from the National Institutes of Health. Portions of these data were reported at the International Symposium on Olfaction and Taste held in Snowmass, CO, July 1986, and at the ninth meeting of the Association for Chemoreception Sciences, Sarastoa, FL, May 1987.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Green, B.G. Spatial and temporal factors in the perception of ethanol irritation on the tongue. Perception & Psychophysics 44, 108–116 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208702
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208702