Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article

Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure

  • Published: January 1992
  • Volume 20, pages 51–68, (1992)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure
Download PDF
  • Keith E. Stanovich1 &
  • Anne E. Cunningham2 
  • 3361 Accesses

  • 220 Citations

  • 13 Altmetric

  • 1 Mention

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Most studies of the cognitive consequences of literacy have attempted to compare the performance of literate individuals with that of illiterate individuals. We argue that it is not absolutely necessary to examine illiterates in order to study the cognitive consequences of reading experience because there is enormous variation in exposure to print even within a generally literate society. In the present study, we tested several methods of assessing differential exposure to print and demonstrated that all have significant correlations with measures of vocabulary, cultural knowledge, spelling ability, and verbal fluency. Several indicators of print exposure predicted variance in these knowledge domains even when general ability and reading-comprehension skill were statistically controlled. Our results, although correlational, suggest that print exposure is an independent contributor to the development of certain verbal skills.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Reading

Chapter © 2019

Time to read Young Adult fiction: print exposure and linguistic correlates in adolescents

Article 17 October 2019

Sandra Martin-Chang, Stephanie Kozak & Maya Rossi

Linguistic Diversity: Basic Concepts and Implications for Reading Research

Chapter © 2022
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Akinnaso, F. N. (1981). The consequences of literacy in pragmatic and theoretical perspectives.Anthropology & Education Quarterly,12, 163–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., &Fielding, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school.Reading Research Quarterly,23, 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biser, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings.Language,62, 384–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Bennett, J., &Hanna.G. (1981).The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Lombard, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahan, S., &Cohen, N. (1989). Age versus schooling effects on intelligence development.Child Development,60, 1239–1249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., &Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test.Psychological Review,97, 404–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T. H., &Levy, B. A., (Eds.) (1990).Reading and its development: Component skills approaches. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J. (1990).On intelligence... more or less: A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, W., &Danielewicz, J. (1987). Properties of spoken and written language. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds,),Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 83–113). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Hutchinson, J. E., &Rosin, A. F. (1989). How inferences about novel domain-related concept scan be constrained by structured knowledge.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,35, 27–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, C. (1972). Stages in language development and reading exposure.Harvard Educational Review,42, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corson, D. (1985).The lexical bar. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., &Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience.Journal of Educational Psychology,82, 733–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., &Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling.Journal of Educational Psychology,83, 264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M. (1991). Individual differences in reading skills. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.),Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 512–538). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. (1988).Rational choice in anuncertain world. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., &Dunn, L. M. (1981).Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., &Markwardt, F. C. (1970).Peabody Individual Achievement Test, Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, P. H. (1965).Adult book reading in the United States (Report No. 105). Chicago: University of Chicago, National Opinion Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, T. H. (1971). A scale to measure attitudes toward reading.Journal of Reading,15, 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. W., Shaneweiler, D., &Liberman, I. Y. (1985). Spelling proficiency and sensitivity to word structure.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure.Psychological Bulletin,101, 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B., Edwards, J., &Gorman, K. (1987). Does rising literacy spark economic growth? Commercial expansion in Mexico. In D. A. Wagner (Ed.),The future of literacy in a changing world (pp. 319–340). Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation.Personality & Individual Differences,7, 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1988). The legacies of literacy: From Plato to Freire through Harvey Graff.Harvard Educational Review,58, 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T. (1991).How we know what isn’t so. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1977).The domestication of the savage mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1987).The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, H. J. (1986). The legacies of literacy: Continuities and contradictions in western society and culture. In S. de Castell, A. Luke, & K. Egan (Eds.),literacy, society, and schooling (pp. 61–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, H. J. (1987).The labyrinths of literacy. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaney, V. (1980). Factors related to amount and time of leisure time reading.Reading Research Quarterly,15, 337–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greaney, V., &Hegarty, M. (1987). Correlates of leisure-time reading.Journal of Research in Reading,10, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. (1972). Oral or written language: The consequences for cognitive development in Africa, the United States and England.Language & Speech,15, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T. (1981). Reading in New Zealand: Achievement and volume.Reading Research Quarterly,17, 6–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie.I. T., &Greaney, V. (1991). Literacy acts. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.),Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 68–96). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., &Seifert, M. (1983). Profiles of reading activity in a community.Journal of Reading,26, 498–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, E. A. (1963).Preface to Plato. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, E. A. (1980). The coming of literate communication to Western culture.Journal of Communication, 30, 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. P. (1988). Speaking and writing: Distinct patterns of word choice.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 572–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. P., &Ahrens, M. (1988). Vocabulary simplification for children: A special case of ‘motherese’?Journal of Child Language,15, 395–410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huck, C. S. (1966).Taking inventory of children’s literary background. Glenview, IL: Scott-Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M., &McClelland, J. (1979). Processing determinants of reading speed.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 151–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, S., &Wilkinson, G. S. (1984).Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. (1980).Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.Journal of Educational Psychology,80, 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1987).The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaestle, C. F. (1991).literacy in the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C. (1984). Mechanisms of cognitive development and the structure of knowledge. In R. Sternberg (Ed.),Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 81–99). New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N., &Pedhazur, E. J. (1973).Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I. S., &Guthrie, J. T. (1984). Prose comprehension and text search as a function of reading volume.Reading Research Quarterly,19, 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I., &Jungeblut, A. (1986).Literacy: Profiles of America’s young adults. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R., &Teale, W. H. (1980). Another look at secondary school students’ attitudes toward reading.Journal of Reading Behavior,12, 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1976).Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, M. (Ed.) (1988).The standard periodical directory (11th ed.). New York: Oxbridge Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morais, J., Bertelson, P., Cary, L., &Alegria, J. (1986). Literacy training and speech segmentation.Cognition,24, 45–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., &Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English?Reading Research Quarterly,19, 304–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., &Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context.Reading Research Quarterly,20, 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nell, V. (1988). The psychology of reading for pleasure: Needs and gratification.Reading Research Quarterly,23, 6–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, L., &Ross, L. (1980).Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M. (1986).The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M. (1987). The role of context in written communication. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.),Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 197–214). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing.Harvard Educational Review,47, 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1986). The cognitive consequences of literacy.Canadian Psychology,27, 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1987). An introduction to understanding literacy.Interchange,18, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1988). Mind and media: The epistemic functions of literacy.Journal of Communication,38, 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W. J. (1967).The presence of the word. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W. J. (1982).Orality and literacy. London: Methuen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,46, 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W., &Glaser, R. (1979). Cognitive correlates and components in the analysis of individual differences. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.),Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measurement (pp. 61–88). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985).Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson’s Guides (1990).Peterson’s guide to four-year colleges (21st Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s Guides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, N. (1985).Amusing ourselves to death. New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell-Gates, V. (1988). Lexical and syntactic knowledge of written narrative held by well-read-to kindergartners and second graders.Research in the Teaching of English,22, 128–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1962).Advanced Progressive Matrices (Set II). London: H. K. Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., &Raven, J. (1977).Manual for Advanced Progressive Matrices (Sets I & H). London: H. K. Lewis & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D., &Finn, C. E. (1987).What do ourl7-year-olds know? New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. (1989).The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redeker, G. (1984). On differences between spoken and written language.Discourse Processes,7, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, G. E. (1986). The everyday activities of adults: Implications for prose recall: I.Educational Gerontology,12, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scinto, L. (1986).Written language and psychological development. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sribner, S. (1986). Thinking in action: Some characteristics of practical thought. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.),Practical intelligence (pp. 13–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S., &Cole, M. (1978). Literacy without schooling: Testing for intellectual effects.Harvard Educational Review, 48, 448–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S., &Cole, M. (1981).The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon, A. T. (1973–1974). What do adults read?Reading Research Quarterly,9, 148–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sincoff, J. B., &Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Two faces of verbal ability.Intelligence,11, 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., &Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Erperimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly,21, 360–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing.Reading Research Quarterly,24, 402–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985).Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Most vocabulary is learned from context. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.),The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 89–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988).The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1990).Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, B. (1983).The implications of literacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. M., Frye, B. J., &Maruyama, G. M. (1990). Time spent reading and reading growth.American Educational Research Journal,27, 351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1973–1974). Reading as reasoning.Reading Research Quarterly,9, 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A. (1987). Literacy futures: Five common problems from industrializing and developing countries. In D. A. Wagner (Ed.),The future of literacy in a changing world (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J., &Tsai, S. (1984). Reading achievement and diminishing returns to time.Journal of Educational Psychology,76, 442–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R. F., &Stanovich, K. E. (1991). The incidental acquisition of information from reading.Psychological Science,2, 325–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, W. (1977).On further examination. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zill, N., &Winglee, M. (1990).Who reads literature? Cabin John, MD: Seven Locks Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 252 Bloor Street West, M5S 1V6, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Keith E. Stanovich

  2. University of California, Berkeley, California

    Anne E. Cunningham

Authors
  1. Keith E. Stanovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne E. Cunningham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The participation of the second author was funded by a Spencer Fellowship from the National Academy of Education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E. Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Mem Cogn 20, 51–68 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208254

Download citation

  • Received: 19 April 1991

  • Accepted: 26 July 1991

  • Issue Date: January 1992

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208254

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Reading Comprehension
  • Verbal Fluency
  • General Ability
  • General Cognitive Ability
  • Print Exposure
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

5.135.140.155

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature