Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 384–390 | Cite as

Serial processing and the parallel-lines illusion: Length contrast through relative spatial separation of contours

  • Kevin Jordan
  • Diane J. Schiano
Article

Abstract

The distortion of perceived line length produced by the parallel-lines configuration reversed fromassimilation to contrast with large suprafoveal spatial separation of the contextual and test lines (Experiment 1). This new contrast effect was predicted by a pool-and-store model of size distortion (Girgus & Coren, 1982). However, contrary to the predictions of the model, the amount of spatial separation needed to produce the reversal did not depend on an absolute visual-angle (foveal) measure of separation. Rather, the reversal was determined by the relative spatial separation of contextual and test lines (Experiment 2); that is, small test lines required a smaller spatial separation from a contextual line to produce contrast than did larger test lines. On the basis of these findings, a revised pool-and-store model of length distortion is proposed.

References

  1. Brigell, M., &Uhlarik, J. (1979). The relational determination of length illusions and length aftereffects.Perception,8, 187–197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brjgell, M., Uhlarik, J., &Goldhorn, P. (1977). Contextual influences on judgments of linear extent.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bross, M., Blair, R., &Longtin, P. (1978). Assimilation theory, attentive fields and the Mueller-Lyer illusion.Perception,7, 297–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, T. S. (1975). General biology of sensory systems. In B. Scharf (Ed.),Experimental sensory psychology (pp. 68–111). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  5. Cores, S., &Girgus, J. S. (1972). A comparison of five methods of dluston measurement.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,4, 240–244.Google Scholar
  6. Coren, S., &Girgus, J. S. (1978).Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Ditchburn, R. W. (1973).Eye-movements and visual perception. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Girgus, J. S., &Coren, S (1982). Assimilation and contrast illusions: Differences in plasticity.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 555–561.Google Scholar
  9. Jordan, K., &Uhlarik, J (1985). Assimilation and contrast of perceived length depend on temporal factors.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 447–454.Google Scholar
  10. Jordas, K., &Uhlarik, J. (1986) Length contrast in the Müller-Lyer figure: Functional equivalence of temporal and spatial separation.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 267–274.Google Scholar
  11. Pollack, R. H., &Chapus, M. R. (1964). Effects of prolonged stimulation by components of the Mueller-Lyer figure upon the magnitude of the illusion.Perceptual & Motor Skills,18, 377–382Google Scholar
  12. Pressy, A. W. (1972). The assimilation theory of geometric illusions: An additional postulate.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 28–30.Google Scholar
  13. Pressy, A. W. (1979). Are black circles atlentive fields? A reply to Bross, Blair, and Longtin.Perception,8, 237–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pressy, A. W. (1983).Some delusions about illusions. Invited address at Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.Google Scholar
  15. Pressy, A. W., &Bross, M. (1973). Assimilaton theory and the reversed Mueller-Lyer illusion.Perception,2, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pressy, A W., Butchard, N., &Scivner, L. (1971). Assimilation theory and the Ponzo illusion: Quantitative predictions.Canadian Journal of Psychology,25, 486–497.Google Scholar
  17. Pressy, A. W., &DiLollo, V (1978). Effects of distance between standard and comparison lines on the Muller-Lyer Illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pressey, A. W., &Murray, R. (1976). Further developments in the assmulation theory of geometric illusions: The adjacency principlePerception & Psychophysics,19, 536–544.Google Scholar
  19. Pressey, A. W., &Wilson, A. E. (1980). Assimdation theory and the Baldwin illusion.Italian Journal of Psychology,7, 65–73.Google Scholar
  20. Schiano, D. J., & Girgus, J. S. (1981). A second look at the parallel line illusion. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Jordan
    • 1
  • Diane J. Schiano
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySan Jose State UniversitySan Jose
  2. 2.Oberlin CollegeOberlin

Personalised recommendations