Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cowan, N. (1989). A reply to Miles, Madden, and Jones (1989): Mistakes and other flaws in the challenge to the cross-modal Stroop effect.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 82–84.
Cowan, N., &Barron, A. (1987). Cross-modal, auditory-visual Stroop interference and possible implications for speech memory.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 393–401.
Jones, D. M., Miles, C., & Page, J. (in press). Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory?Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Miles, C., Madden, C., &Jones, D. M. (1989). Cross-modal, auditory-visual Stroop interference: A reply to Cowan and Barton (1987).Perception & Psychophysics,45, 77–81.
Miles, C., Madden, C., &Jones, D. M. (1988). Levels of interference by irrelevant speech: One, some or many? In A. Colley & J. Beech (Eds.),Cognition and action in skilled behaviour (pp. 349–359). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland.
Salamé, P., &Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 150–164.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was funded by a grant from the United Kingdom’s Economic and Social Research Council. Neil Morris provided useful discussion in the preparation of this reply.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miles, C., Jones, D.M. The fallacy of the cross-modal Stroop effect: A rejoinder to Cowan (1989). Perception & Psychophysics 45, 85–86 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208038
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208038