Abstract
Pigeons were trained on a two-stimulus-shape (a plus and a circle) complex conditional discrimination that required birds to match sample and comparison stimuli on some trials and to mismatch on other trials, depending on the level of chamber illumination (bright or dark). Following acquisition, the birds were transferred to a novel color (red and green) task. For half of the birds, the contingenties between levels of illumination and the match/mismatch response requirements were consistent with training (nonreversal condition). For the remaining birds, the contingencies between levels of illumination and match/mismatch response requirements were the opposite of those established in training (reversal condition). Birds in the nonreversal condition acquired the color match/mismatch task at a significantly faster rate than birds in the reversal condition. These results indicate that relation-based responding (generalized matching/ mismatching) is subject to discriminative control.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Carter, D. E., &Werner, T. J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,29, 565–601.
Cumming, W. W., &Berryman, R. (1961). Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,4, 281–284.
Cumming, W. W., &Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: Studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.),Stimulus generalimtion. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
D’Amato, M. R., &Salmon, D. P. (1983). Cognitive processes in cebus monkeys. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
D’Amato, M. R., Salmon, D. P., &Columbo, M. (1985). Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 35–51.
Farthing, G. W., &Opuda, M. J. (1974). Transfer of matching-to-sample in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,21, 199–213.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1983).Conditioning and associative learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peterson, G. B. (1983). How expectancies guide behavior. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Premack, D. (1978). On the abstractness of human concepts: Why it would be difficult to talk to a pigeon. In S. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Santi, A. (1978). The role of physical identity of the sample and correct comparison stimulus in matching-to-sample paradigms.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,29, 511–516.
Urcuioli, P. (1977).Transfer of oddity-from-sample performance in pigeons. Unpublished master’s thesis, Dalhousie University.
Zentall, T. R., &Hogan, D. E. (1974). Abstract concept learning in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 393–398.
Zentall, T. R., &Hogan, D. E. (1976). Pigeons can learn identity, or difference, or both.Science,191, 408–409.
Zentall, T. R., &Hogan, D. E. (1978). Same/different concept learning in the pigeon: The effect of negative instances and prior adaptation to the transfer stimuli.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,30, 177–186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Portions of these data were presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, May 1983.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edwards, C.A., Miller, J.S. & Zentall, T.R. Control of pigeons’ matching and mismatching performance by instructional cues. Animal Learning & Behavior 13, 383–391 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208014
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208014