Abstract
In a Web-based general psychology course, students were observed to postpone use of on-line study aids until 2 days prior to examinations, thus negating any influence of advance organizers (Taraban, Maki, & Rynearson, 1999). We attempted to modify this behavior by providing course credit in the form of short quizzes as rewards for using on-line study aids to preview each chapter. Some students received quizzes after previewing frequently asked questions (FAQ); other students received quizzes after previewing chapter outlines. Students who received quizzes for previewing FAQ pages accessed those pages more frequently than did students who received quizzes for previewing outline pages. Increased access to FAQs was associated with higher scores on FAQ-related midterm examination questions. However, the advantage on examination items was not apparent on a cumulative final examination. Navigational structures and reward values need to be considered when one is managing contingencies in Web courses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bork, A. (1997). The future of computers and learning.Technological Horizons in Education,24, 69–77.
Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning.American Journal of Distance Education,10, 4–36.
Dillon, A., &Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learning comprehension, control, and style.Review of Educational Research,68, 322–349.
Maki, R. H., Maki, W. S., Patterson, M., &Whittaker, P. D. (2000). Evaluation of a Web-based introductory psychology course: I. Learning and satisfaction in on-line versus lecture courses.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32, 230–239.
Maki, W. S., &Maki, R. H. (1997). Learning without lectures: A case study.IEEE Computer,30, 107–108.
Merisotis, J. P., &Phipps, R. A. (1999, May/June). What’s the difference? Outcomes of distance vs. traditional classroom-based learning.Change,31, 13–17.
Schwartz, A. (1998). Tutorial: Perl, a psychologically efficient reformatting language.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,30, 605–609.
Stein, L. (1998).Official guide to programming with CGI.pm. New York: Wiley.
Taraban, R., Maki, W. S., &Rynearson, K. (1999). Measuring study time distributions: Implications for designing computer-based courses.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 263–269.
Twigg, C. A. (1999).Improving learning & reducing costs: Redesigning large-enrollment courses [On-line]. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, The Pew Learning and Technology Program, Center for Academic Transformation. http://www.center.rpi.edu.
Wall, L., Christiansen, T., &Schwartz, R. L. (1996).Programming Perl (2nd edition). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly & Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Support for development and evaluation of the Web course was provided by National Science Foundation Grant DUE 9752349 to R.H.M. and W.S.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maki, W.S., Maki, R.H. Evaluation of a Web-based introductory psychology course: II. Contingency management to increase use of on-line study aids. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 32, 240–245 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207789
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207789